Implementation of Trade and Environment
Provisions in Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs): The New Zealand Experience
Statement by New Zealand at the Regular Session of the
Committee on Trade and Environment (CTE) of 30 June 2016
_______________
1 Introduction
1.
New Zealand's
approach to trade and environment provisions in preferential trade agreements
(PTAs) reflects a policy position that is grounded in the Government's belief
that such agreements are not ends in themselves. They are a means to an end. Specifically,
they are intended to enhance opportunities for economic growth in order to
improve living standards, thereby contributing positively to sustainable
development.
2.
It is in this
context that the approach to trade and environment in New Zealand's trade
policy is intended to ensure the mutual supportiveness of such inter-related
provisions. New Zealand places considerable emphasis on securing
legally-binding treaty-level outcomes and this informs the process of
implementation. In this regard, it is important to emphasise that securing the
mutual supportiveness of trade and the environment in practical terms through
New Zealand's PTAs is contingent on the effective implementation of the
negotiated outcomes, including the relevant PTA's trade and environment-related
provisions and instruments. The following sections are divided into three
inter-related components. The first section outlines the New Zealand
context for the way it approaches this important issue. The second identifies
how New Zealand seeks to implement the trade and environment provisions
negotiated through its PTAs. The third section briefly summarises the
institutional mechanisms that are utilised, with the fourth section providing
some detail on the practical cooperation that is undertaken through these
instruments. The concluding section highlights the fundamental importance
New Zealand attaches to ensuring that trade policy, including through
PTAs, can contribute to positive environmental outcomes and notes the
importance of looking ahead to consider how trade might contribute to
addressing some of society's wider concerns, including on climate change, fish
stocks, environmentally harmful subsidies such as fossil fuel subsidies and so
on. What is also clear from the New Zealand experience is that "one-size"
does not always fit all.
2 The New Zealand Context
3.
New Zealand
has previously presented to the Committee on Trade and the Environment in
detail on the trade and environment provisions that we have included in or
alongside our PTAs, including our rationale for doing so. In sum,
New Zealand includes trade and environment provisions in our PTAs for
three inter-related reasons, including to:
•
show the commitment of the parties to the principles
of sustainable development in the context of trade, and acknowledge
increasing international interest in how goods and services are produced;
•
ensure
that each party is able to benefit from its legitimate comparative advantages
and compete on a "level playing field"; and
•
provide a means by which the
parties can engage on trade and
environment issues of shared interest and benefit.
4.
We achieve these
objectives by negotiating the following types of provisions:
·
common
understandings and/or commitments as they relate to trade and
the environment, including the "classical" trade and environment
provision which seeks to prevent the use of environmental standards as a disguised form of
trade protectionism; and seeks to prevent the lowering of environmental
standards for a trade advantage.
·
a framework and appropriate
mechanism for cooperation; and
·
a means of communication and consultation between
the parties on relevant trade and environment-related issues.
5.
New Zealand has
concluded nine PTAs since the launch of the Doha Round in 2001, all of which
either include Trade and Environment chapters or have Trade and Environment
side instruments associated with them. Currently there are nine operative
environment chapters/instruments with 11 countries. The first such instrument
was with Thailand (entered into force in 2005), followed by the agreement with
P4 partners (Brunei Darussalam, Singapore and Chile, 2006) and then with China
(entered into force in 2008). The most recent is with the Republic of Korea
(entered into force on 20 December 2015). With the exception of the instrument
agreed with Thailand, all of the outcomes are legally binding and Treaty-level.
3 Implementation of trade and environment provisions
6.
It is of course
one thing to agree such provisions, their real value is in whether and how the
Parties implement and use the trade and environment provisions of their PTAs.
7.
New Zealand's strategy
to guide the implementation of trade and environment provisions in PTAs focuses
primarily on the gains from cooperation for mutual benefit. These are delivered
through the range of institutional provisions that are built into each
agreement and which are then deployed following ratification of the agreement
itself.
8.
Each partner is
dealt with on a case-by-case basis where cooperation programmes are based on an
agreed set of trade and environment-related priorities. These may build on the
commitments and understandings or potential projects outlined in the agreement
itself.
4 Institutional Mechanisms
9.
A successful
relationship based on cooperation is possible only if the parties are able to
communicate effectively. Regular meetings of the parties and regular contact
between the national contact points are important aspects of this. In our
experience, this helps build trust and confidence which not only facilitates
project development and implementation, but also makes it easier to discuss any
issues of concern that might arise.
5 Cooperation Activities
10.
Since 2006, New
Zealand has completed more than 90 cooperation projects with Thailand, Chile,
Singapore, Brunei Darussalam, Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia and China.
11.
These projects
have used a range of cooperation formats, such as capacity-building workshops,
seminars, study tours, peer reviews, exchanges of experts, exchanges of
information, and joint research projects. This one-size does not fit all
approach seeks to be responsive to and reflect the interests, needs and
resources of the participating partners.
12.
The
New Zealand experience has been that projects evolve as partners' needs
evolve, particularly in regards to the types of trade and environment-related
challenges that need to be addressed. For
example, over time in the development of the cooperation arrangements from the
agreement, there has been a discernible shift away from specific capacity-building
projects towards assistance – in both directions - with policy development and
implementation.
13.
Consistent with
the framework that guides negotiators, New Zealand's preference remains
projects that provide both environmental and
trade benefits. These have
covered a range of issues such as freshwater management, air quality standards
and management, environmental governance, climate change mitigation and
adaptation, biodiversity, vehicle emissions, biofuels, renewable energy
development, energy efficiency, and environmental impact assessment.
14.
New Zealand takes
a broad and inclusive approach to implementation. Engagement with partner
countries is led by the Ministry for the Environment working in conjunction
with other New Zealand government agencies including those responsible for
foreign affairs and trade, conservation, agriculture, forestry and fisheries,
and economic development. In addition, local authorities, and non-government
organisations including Crown Research Institutes, universities, iwi/Māori
authorities, and businesses are also involved. Policy coherence is a touchstone
for all engagement in the implementation of environmental provisions.
15.
By engaging with
a broad range of stakeholders who can contribute funding and their own specific
expertise, we can often mitigate as far as possible the challenge all partners
have faced with regard to limited resources – both human and financial.
16.
Cooperation
activities often begin with small scale, short term projects that help to build
confidence amongst the parties through quick and practical outcomes that
deliver benefits. As the relationship matures, New Zealand looks to engage in
larger scale, longer term projects involving multiple stakeholders to deliver
durable and sustained benefits that can enhance both trade and environment
policy outcomes with local, regional and international effect.
17.
A recent example
is a four year project with China where the New Zealand and Chinese Environment
Ministries together with agricultural research organisations, universities and
private sector firms collaborated to trial alternative methods of safe disposal
of dairy effluent to land. The successful outcome provides the basis for a
policy change regarding sustainable land management and opens the way for large
scale dairy development in China that avoids further pollution of waterways.
6 Conclusion
18.
Trade and
environment provisions are an important part of New Zealand's approach to
PTAs, but New Zealand's commitment to these issues does not end with the
conclusion of negotiations. Effective implementation of PTAs - through a range
of institutional mechanisms and approaches which help to deliver practical
cooperation activities – can reinforce the mutual supportiveness of trade and
the environment. The practical approach New Zealand and its partners take
to the implementation of the outcomes that have been negotiated underscores a
shared commitment to ensure that trade policy in general and PTAs in particular
can support and contribute to meaningful and practical outcomes that help drive
sustainable development. Importantly too, the New Zealand experience
suggests that a one-size-fits-all approach is not practical. Rather, bespoke
approaches are needed to ensure effective and efficient delivery of
sustainability-related objectives.
19.
More broadly,
both bilaterally and multilaterally, New Zealand's experience in
negotiating trade and environment provisions has reinforced the importance of
mutual supportiveness in this area. It is clear too that trade policy can and
should contribute to addressing global challenges. In this context, New Zealand's
Minister of Trade, the Hon. Todd McClay recently observed that we should "consider
how trade can help us achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goals (UNSDGs)
agreed by world leaders in September 2015."[1]
He observed that several of the SDGs touch on the nexus between trade and the
environment. UNSDG 12, for instance, touches on the issue of fossil fuel
subsidies. There is a question as to how reform in this area might be secured
and what role trade policy might play. Similarly, UNSDG 14 is about protecting
the oceans and global fish stocks. This can be achieved, including through the
development of disciplines on fish subsidies. The WTO is already contributing
with ongoing negotiations in this area and the provisions contained in the
recently concluded Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement are similarly seeking to
address this urgent challenge. Clearly, as the New Zealand Minister
concludes "trade agreements can contribute to solutions to the most
pressing global problems of our times."
__________