information on IMPLEMENTATION and
administration
of the agreement on customs valuation
Check-list of Issues
Papua New Guinea
The following communication,
dated 8 November 2024, is being circulated at the request of the delegation of Papua
New Guinea.
_______________
1._
Questions concerning Article 1:
(a)_
Sales between related persons:
(i)_
Are sales between related persons subject
to special provisions?
Yes, the sales between related
persons is subject to the provision per section 5(1)d et seq. of the Customs (Ad valorem Duties) Regulations (our Valuation Regulation).
(ii)_
Is the fact of intercompany prices prima
facie considered as grounds for regarding the respective prices as being
influenced?
No, section 5(1)(d) et seq. also
contains additional requirements.
(iii)_
What is the provision for giving the
communication of the afore-mentioned grounds in writing if the importer so
requests? (Article 1.2(a))
The relevant provision is in
section 5.2(a-d) where the importer is given the opportunity to respond in
writing as requested by Customs.
(iv)_
How has Article 1.2(b) been implemented?
Article 1.2 (b) has been
implemented through section 5(1)(d) et seq. when there is rejection of the transaction
value in trying to determine whether the price was influenced by a related
party transaction.
(b)_
Price of lost or damaged goods:
Are there any special provisions or practical
arrangements concerning the valuation of lost or damaged goods?
There
are no provisions in the Valuation Regulation regarding valuation of lost or
damaged goods but practically if the damaged goods are imported as it is in the
damaged condition and the value declared is less with confirmation of documents
verifying the reduced value, it is accepted by Customs.
2._
How has the provision of Article 4 to allow
the importer an opinion to reverse the order of application of Articles 5 and 6
been implemented?
Article 4 is reflected in Division 1, section 3 (5) of our Valuation
regulation.
3._
How has Article 5.2 been implemented?
Article 5.2 is reflected in Division 5, sections 12 & 13 of our Valuation
Regulation.
4._
How
has Article 6.2 been implemented?
Article 6.2 is reflected in Division 6, sections 16,17 & 18 of our Valuation
Regulation.
5._
Questions concerning Article 7:
(a)_
What provisions have been made for making
value determinations pursuant to Article 7?
The provision in relation to the fall-back method is Section 19 of the
Valuation Regulation.
(b)_
What is the provision for informing the
importer of the customs value determined under Article 7?
Article 7.3 of CVA is reflected in Division
2, section 5(2)(a-d) of the Valuation regulation.
(c) Are the prohibitions found
in Article 7.2 delineated?
They are not currently contained in the Valuation Regulation.
Discussions are going on to update the regulation.
6._
How have the options found in Article 8.2
been handled? In the case of f.o.b. application, are ex-factory prices also
accepted?
PNG is
a CIF country, so all options are included and in FOB the ex-factory costs are
included. This relates to the transportation costs from the country of export
per section 6(1)(a)(vi-vii) of the Valuation Regulation.
7._
Where is the rate of exchange published, as
required by Article 9.1?
The rate of exchange in PNG currency is PNG Kina published by the
Central Bank of PNG as per section 24 of the Valuation Regulation.
8._
What steps have been taken to ensure
confidentiality, as required by Article 10?
Per section 23 of the Valuation Regulation, all information communicated
to Customs is kept confidential.
9._
Questions Concerning Article 11:
(a)_
What rights of appeal are open to the
importer or any other person?
The right to appeal against decision made by Customs for final
determination of value per section 25 of the Valuation Regulation.
(b)_
How is he to be informed of his right to
further appeal?
Pursuant to section 25, the importer is informed of his right to appeal
in writing.
10._
Provide information on the publication, as
required by Article 12, of:
(a)
(i)_
The relevant national laws;
The Customs Act 1951 (Chapter 101).
(ii)_
The regulations concerning the application
of the Agreement;
The Customs (Ad Valorem Duties) Regulation
1987.
(iii)_
The judicial decision and administrative
rulings of general application relating to the Agreement;
There is no Judicial decision so far as no cases in relation to Customs
Valuation was brought before the court. There is only one Administrative Ruling
given on Insurance in 2004 and is still in force.
(iv)_
General or specific laws being referred to
in the rules of implementation or application.
There are none.
(b)_
Is the publication of further rules
anticipated? Which topics would they cover?
Yes it will be addressed through valuation Advices issued and done administratively.
11._
Questions concerning Article 13:
(a)_
How is the obligation of Article 13
(last sentence) being dealt with in the respective legislation?
Yes, Section 20 in the Valuation Regulation relates to Article 13.
(b)_
Have additional explanations been laid
down?
No additional explanations.
12._
Questions concerning Article 16:
(a)_
Does the respective national legislation contain a
provision requiring customs authorities to give an explanation in writing as to
how the customs value was determined?
Yes, section 23 of the Valuation Regulation.
(b)_
Are there any further regulations concerning an
above-mentioned request?
No there are no further regulations.
13._
How have the Interpretative Notes of the Agreement
been included?
They have been included as part of the sequential methods of valuation
as divisions in the Valuation Regulation.
14._
How have the provisions of the Decision on
the Treatment of Interest Charges in the Customs Value of Imported Goods been
implemented?
The provision of interest charges is
reflected in Section 1, Subsections 4 and 5.
15._
For those countries applying paragraph 2 of
the Decision on the Valuation of Carrier Media Bearing Software for Data
Processing Equipment, how have the provisions of this paragraph been
implemented?
There
are no provisions in our Valuation Regulation but practically duty was
collected only on the carrier media bearing the software. The value of the
software was included in the carrier media hence considered as total value of
the Carrier media. It is not implemented now because the carrier media is no
longer in use anymore as software is purchased online and installed directly on
the Data processing Equipment.
__________