A FRAMEWORK FOR MODERNIZING AND REVITALIZING
THE DELIBERATIVE
FUNCTION OF THE WTO ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT:
TOWARD A MORE SEQUENCED APPROACH TO BRIDGE
THE MISSING LINK BETWEEN DOMESTIC TRADE
POLICIES AND THE WTO TRADE RULES
COMMUNICATION FROM JAPAN
The following communication,
dated 5 November 2025, is being circulated at the request of the delegation of Japan.
_______________
1 OBJECTIVE
1.1. Japan presented several viewpoints as trade-related takeaways from
the Ninth Tokyo International Conference on African Development (TICAD 9)
through its session at the WTO Public Forum[1]
and the information agenda at the General Council meeting last October.[2]
These include: i) (as a premise) trade is one tool for development,
and the WTO is only one part of the broader global community which contributes
to the development, hence, there needs to be even more focus on the WTO's
unique added value; ii) (as a common objective) promoting the integration of
developing country Members including least developed countries (LDCs)
(hereinafter referred to as "the developing countries") into global
trade and supply chains benefits the entire world economy; and iii) (as an
effective means) the WTO could foster trust and partnership by improving the
trade and investment environment in developing countries. In our view, these three viewpoints can serve as a basis
for the Committee on Trade and Development (CTD) delegates to consider what they
can collectively work on, putting aside the differences among their respective
positions.
1.2. This communication aims to present a more concrete suggestion to
translate these viewpoints into actionable and practical works in the CTD, by
presenting a more sequenced approach to bridge the missing link between
domestic trade policies and WTO trade rules, by calling for:
_
i._
Firstly, drawing
applicable lessons on effective trade policies for the integration of
developing countries into global trade and supply chains, from Members'
experiences including – but not limited to – past
experiences of technical assistance and capacity building (TACB) and Aid for
Trade, as well as from other successful experiences of Members using available
resources such as past Trade Policy Reviews (TPRs); and
_
ii._
Secondly, sharing
such lessons within the CTD to build a shared knowledge base for more evidence-based discussion on the relationship between such
effective trade policies and WTO trade rules.
2 DRAWING LESSONS ON EFFECTIVE TRADE POLICIES FOR THE INTEGRATION OF
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES INTO THE GLOBAL TRADE AND SUPPLY CHAINS
2.1. One valuable takeaway from the Development Retreat was the need to
deepen discussion on Members' domestic policies helping developing countries'
integration into global trade and supply chains. It was mentioned in the
General Council Chair's takeaways (JOB/GC/425)
that "(b)y exchanging best practices, Members can enhance their
policies, improve integration into regional and global value chains, and
reinforce the WTO as a platform for knowledge sharing." To that end,
paragraphs 2.2 to 2.4 introduce some options.
2.2. Members – both donors and beneficiaries – have accumulated rich
lessons to share which they learned from their participation in TACB and Aid-for-Trade
(AfT) programmes. Now, Members at the CTD could further debate how such lessons
from the past TACB and AfT programmes could be best compiled to serve Members
in identifying effective domestic trade policies helping developing countries'
integration into global trade and supply chains.
_
i._
For that purpose,
Members may wish to unpack the factors for the success of previous TACB and AfT
programmes. For example, the
WTO Secretariat's 2010–2011 report on AfT case studies in the Asia-Pacific
region showed some critical factors for the success and sustainability of
AfT interventions, such as: i) ownership by the beneficiary country at both
political and technical implementation level; ii) alignment of the project with
the beneficiary country's national priorities; iii) involvement and commitment
of the private sector in both prioritizing needs and implementation; and iv)
commitment by the beneficiary country to implement the lessons learned from the
project.
_
ii._
Likewise, Members
may wish to introduce policy-oriented lessons shared with other Members through
their bilateral or trilateral AfT programmes. Examples of such lessons and
knowledge shared through Japan's recent trilateral cooperation include: i)
deepening the understanding of ASEAN economic integration (its history,
strategy, measures, etc.) for the purposes of policy development for AfCFTA
implementation[3];
and ii) knowledge and skills regarding success stories (best practices),
challenges, and lessons learned in trade and investment promotion as the
collaboration between Japan and Indonesia for African countries.[4]
2.3. Previous TPR reports and findings can be used as a valuable source
of information for identifying policies to address constraints hindering integration
into global trade and supply chains.
2.4. Members may wish to bring in other successful national experiences
on the proactive use of their trade policies for their integration into global
trade and supply chains. Perspectives offered by business stakeholders would
also be valuable.
3.1. Using such applicable lessons, the CTD, in line with its terms of
references (WT/L/46),
can function as a venue for Members to build a shared
knowledge base, which would inform Members' discussion on the relationship
between specific domestic measures necessary for developing countries' economic
advancement into global trade and supply chains, and WTO trade rules.
3.2. Assisted by the Secretariat's useful inputs including its recent
analytical works on special and differential treatment (S&DT) (JOB/COMTD/15 and JOB/COMTD/15/Add.1), such discussion could focus on: i) how these measures relate to
WTO trade rules; and ii) how WTO rules can support those domestic measures.
This would further guide Members' evidence-based discussion for: iii)
identifying trade rules (both existing ones and new ones to be negotiated) that
promote greater integration into global trade and supply chains; and iv) making
S&DT more targeted and "tailor-made" to fit the specific
circumstances of each developing country Member.[5]
4 CONCLUSION
4.1. The idea proposed in this communication is a framework for modernizing
and revitalizing the deliberative function of the WTO on trade and development
within the context of WTO reform. And in our view, the three perspectives
mentioned in paragraph 1.1, particularly the common fundamental objective of
better integrating developing countries into global trade and supply chains,
through the rules-based and open multilateral trading system with the WTO at
its core, can provide a viable springboard on which CTD delegates may work
collectively and pragmatically.
4.2. A more sequenced approach to bridge the missing link between
domestic trade policies and WTO trade rules, as discussed in this
communication, could lead to further operationalization of the function of the
CTD as a focal point for consideration and coordination of work on development
in the WTO. The CTD could then feed the knowledge gained in this way back to
other relevant WTO bodies.
4.3. This communication is not for proposing outcomes based on specific
timelines. Rather, Japan expects further ideas from other Members as well.
Japan looks forward to continuing the contribution to the Member-led discussion
toward the revitalization of the trade and development work, with a view to
providing practical input into the broader discourse on WTO reform.
__________
[1] The session titled "Co-Creation
Beyond Aid: Trade Vision in TICAD9" explored how well-designed trade,
industrial, and investment policies, under the digitized and modernized trade
system anchored in WTO and AfCFTA frameworks, can support the co-creation of
innovative solutions through public and private collaboration to address common
global challenges and support inclusive development. Panelists also discussed
potential ways for the WTO to modernize its deliberative and negotiating
functions to provide actionable insights for not only African but also global
stakeholders shaping the future of trade-driven development.
[2] The outcome document of TICAD 9 "Yokohama Declaration"
includes several particularly noteworthy points regarding trade and
development, including technology transfer and the relationship between trade
rules and domestic policies. These include: i) regional economic integration
and inter-regional connectivity; ii) enhancing regional value chains to
promote industrialization and job creation; iii) trade facilitation and the
promotion of intra-regional trade (such as the implementation of the African
Continental Free Trade Area); iv) the relevance of current WTO work, such
as the digital trade and the moratorium on imposing customs duties on
electronic transmissions; and v) the importance of improving the business
environment to strengthen the role of the private sector as an engine of
productive transformation.
[3] These are offered in a training
programme organized by Japan in FY2024 in collaboration with the ASEAN
Secretariat, as a cooperative project based on the Memorandum of Cooperation
between Japan's JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency) and the AfCFTA
Secretariat.
[4] These are offered in a training
programme on trade and investment promotion for African countries held in
Jakarta from 8-20 July 2025, based on the Memorandum of Cooperation for
Strengthening Cooperation with African Countries concluded between JICA and the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Indonesia.
[5] This requires i) which S&DT provisions are actually being used;
ii) which are beneficial; iii) which are not being used; and iv) what
unintended effects have resulted from their use, all with a view to promoting
developing countries' greater integration into global trade and supply chains.