REPORT TO THE SPECIAL SESSION
OF THE COMMITTEE ON TRADE
AND DEVELOPMENT BY THE CHAIR OF THE TBT COMMITTEE[1]
The following report is being submitted by
the Chair of the Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Committee), Daniela García, following
consultations with the Chair of the Special Session of the Committee on Trade
and Development (CTD SS), and was prepared with the assistance of the
Secretariat.
_______________
1 BACKGROUND
1.1. Following
the adoption of the Ministerial Declaration on the Precise, Effective and
Operational Implementation of Special and Differential Treatment (S&DT)
Provisions of the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary
Measures (SPS) and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) (MC13
S&DT Declaration)[2],
its implementation was discussed in the CTD SS and in an informal open‑ended
discussion held by the Facilitator for the G90 Agreement‑specific proposals
(ASPs) on the SPS and TBT Agreements on 10 July 2024.[3] In
consultation with the Chair of the CTD SS and with a view to
supporting the CTD SS in its monitoring role and in the preparation of its
report to the December 2024 General Council meeting, the Chairs of the SPS
and TBT Committees have agreed to prepare reports on relevant work
undertaken by their respective Committees.
1.2. This
report, which follows a similar structure to the report prepared by the Chair
of the SPS Committee[4],
builds on the October 2023 CTD SS thematic session on the G90 ASPs on the
SPS and TBT Agreements[5],
as well as on the overall approach discussed on 10 July 2024.[6] It
provides an overview of recent TBT Ministerial Decisions as well as Committee
work of relevance, including in the context of the recently adopted Tenth
Triennial Review. It also includes sections on the ePing SPS&TBT Platform[7]
and on capacity building.[8]
1.3. In
the lead‑up to the WTO's 13th Ministerial Conference (MC13), the
above‑mentioned thematic session on the G90 ASPs on the SPS and TBT Agreements
was held under the ambit of the CTD SS on 4 October 2023. The Session
brought CTD SS, TBT and SPS delegates together, along with relevant
stakeholders, to discuss S&DT and technical assistance in the SPS and TBT
Agreements, developing country Members' related challenges, and relevant work
in the SPS and TBT Committees, as well as other initiatives.[9]
1.4. The
thematic session was structured around three substantive sessions: (i) the
first session featured presentations on the S&DT provisions under the SPS
and TBT Agreements and S&DT‑related work of the Committees; (ii) the second
session covered transparency provisions, including comment period provisions
and guidelines, as well as the ePing
SPS&TBT Platform and transparency‑related capacity building work; and (iii)
the last session focused on the technical assistance and transition period
provisions contained in the SPS and TBT Agreements, as well as TBT and SPS technical
assistance activities delivered by the Secretariat, including the new
transparency champions courses.
2 MC13
Declarations
2.1. Members
adopted two TBT‑related Ministerial Declarations at MC13 in Abu Dhabi in
February 2024 which have development aspects:
a._
The Ministerial Declaration
on Strengthening Regulatory Cooperation to Reduce Technical Barriers to Trade[10]
reaffirms the relevance of the TBT Agreement to modern global trade challenges
and emerging policy concerns and highlights the key role of the TBT
Committee for promoting regulatory cooperation aimed at reducing technical
barriers to trade. The declaration, in its paragraph 5.e, underlines the
importance of transparency and encourages making information on all related
technical regulations/conformity assessment procedures publicly available,
continued refinement of notifications and use of digital tools to improve the
global trading and business environment. Furthermore, paragraph 5.g of the
declaration promotes the further development of and training on digital tools,
including ePing and eAgenda, for early engagement on TBT matters. Paragraph 5.h
of the declaration stresses the importance of technical assistance and capacity
building to address challenges facing developing Members, especially in the
area of transparency and quality infrastructure.
b._
The MC13 S&DT
Declaration[11]
highlights the importance of S&DT and capacity building for developing
Members as a means of supporting the effective implementation of both the SPS
and the TBT Agreements. To this end, the declaration requests improvements in
training and technical assistance as well as improvements to the existing
compilation of comment periods given by Members in their notifications with
respect to SPS and TBT measures.
2.2. These
two declarations have been providing overall direction and guidance to the
ongoing work of the TBT Committee, including under the Tenth Triennial Review
of the TBT Agreement concluded in November 2024.
3 Work
of the TBT Committee
3.1. The
TBT Committee's work evolves continuously, adapting and improving its
functioning based on experience‑sharing and discussions among Members,
sometimes leading to decisions and recommendations adopted by the Committee, all
of which are compiled in the G/TBT/1‑series.[12] The
Committee work is generally guided by the Triennial Reviews which are mandated
under Article 15.4 of the TBT Agreement. Further information on the Tenth
Triennial Review concluded in November 2024 is available under Section 6.
3.1 Transparency
3.2. Transparency
is a fundamental principle enshrined in the WTO Agreements, including the TBT and
SPS Agreements. Increased transparency helps to achieve a greater degree of
clarity, predictability and information about trade and trade policies, rules
and regulations of Members. Under the TBT Agreement, Members are required
submit notifications to inform other Members about new or changed technical
regulations and conformity assessment procedures that may significantly affect trade
and provide a comment period. TBT notifications can be accessed through the ePing SPS&TBT Platform or the Documents
Online application.[13] Transparency
obligations under the TBT Agreement also include the establishment of Enquiry
Points to answer reasonable enquiries from trading partners, and publishing adopted
TBT measures.
3.3. Transparency‑related
matters have been discussed in the TBT Committee under the standing agenda item
on transparency and since 2022, also in the Transparency Working Group (see
paragraph 3.4). Transparency is also one of the main topics considered in the
context of the Triennial Review exercises. Over the years, the TBT Committee
has adopted a series of decisions and recommendations to facilitate the
implementation of transparency provisions. They can be found in Section 6 of
the compilation of decisions and recommendations contained in _G/TBT/1/Rev.15.
3.4. The
Ninth Triennial Review, which was completed in 2021, resulted in 19
transparency‑related recommendations, focusing on areas such as improving the
content of notifications and the related commenting process, domestic
coordination and technical assistance.[14] With
a view to advancing with these recommendations, a Transparency
Working Group (TWG) was established in March 2022 which is open to all
Members. The TWG has helped the Committee advance significantly with most of
the transparency‑related recommendations from the Ninth Triennial Review.[15] Among
others, work has been finalized on three key guidance documents:
a._
In November 2023, the
Committee adopted the revised guidelines for the preparation of new
notifications[16],
calling for further details to be provided on content, timelines and procedures
related to notified measures.
b._
In March 2024, the
Committee adopted guidelines and a corresponding format for the submission
of "statements of implementation" under Article 15.2[17],
aiming to assist Members in describing the overarching legal and institutional
framework they put in place to implement the TBT Agreement. Establishing a more
uniform format for these notifications also makes them more accessible as
reference points for understanding Members' regulatory frameworks.
c._
In June 2024, the
Committee finalized a good practice guide on how to comment on a
notification[18],
intended to assist Enquiry Points and other stakeholders in engaging
proactively in the commenting process.[19]
3.5. Work
under the TWG continues, currently with a focus on further improvements to the
notification formats and guidelines.[20]
3.6. The
Committee also holds regular thematic sessions on transparency as well as
Special Meetings on Procedures for Information Exchange every two to three
years, bringing together Enquiry Points to share experiences and identify good
practices in the management and coordination of outgoing and incoming
notifications, operation of Enquiry Points and use of digital tools. The Tenth
Special Meeting held in June 2023[21]
focused on use of ePing for implementation and outreach to domestic
stakeholders, operation of Enquiry Points and preparation of comments on
notifications. The thematic session held in July 2022[22]
focused on challenges Members have in identifying the specific products covered
by a notified regulation and on good practices for an effective and sustainable
domestic coordination mechanism. In addition, the Secretariat holds ePing walk‑in
sessions on the margins of every TBT week to provide updates on recent enhancements
to ePing and respond to specific questions from delegations.
3.7. The
Committee is mandated to conduct an Annual Review of activities relating to the
implementation and operation of the TBT Agreement, including notifications,
specific trade concerns, technical assistance activities and TBT‑related
disputes. The Annual Review reports contain detailed statistics relating to
transparency obligations.[23]
3.8. In
recent years, Members have been submitting around 4,000 notifications per year.
In 2023, around 80% of notifications were submitted by developing and least‑developed
country Members, with shares of 43% and 37% respectively.[24] Five
Members of the East African Community (EAC) were among the top ten notifying
Members (see Chart 1).
3.1.1.1 Chart
1 – TBT notifications by development status[25]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7730/b77301fdc98cb4a7a170ade41ee184f2bee40e4d" alt=""
3.9. Members
use the TBT Committee to discuss "specific trade concerns" (STCs)
with respect to TBT measures which may affect their trade. These
discussions relate either to proposed or final measures; most of them – 68% –
relate to notified measures. The Committee gives Members an opportunity to
review STCs in a multilateral setting, and to seek further information and
clarification, working towards resolution of concerns. In 2023, Members
reported on progress with nine STCs, the most in any year since 1995, while
also raising a total of 206 STCs, including 34 new ones. Of the 34 new
STCs, 18 were raised by developing Members, 8 were raised by developed Members
and 8 by both developing and developed Members.[26]
3.2 Technical
assistance
3.10. Article 11
of the TBT Agreement requires Members to provide advice and technical
assistance to other Members, especially developing country Members. LDCs should
be given priority with respect to technical assistance activities. TBT‑related technical
assistance envisaged by Article 11 includes, for instance, assistance with the
establishment of national standardizing or conformity assessment bodies, and
the establishment of institutions and legal frameworks to fulfil the
obligations of membership or participation in international or regional systems
for conformity assessment. In addition, Members, if requested by other Members,
are also required to advise on the preparation of technical regulations, how
best to comply with technical regulations and steps to be taken by producers to
gain access to systems for conformity assessment.
3.11. The
standing agenda item on "Technical Cooperation Activities" provides
an opportunity for Members and the WTO Secretariat[27]
to provide updates on their technical assistance activities during the meetings
of the TBT Committee. Over the last three years, one Member has reported on the
technical assistance it provided.[28]
3.12. Observer
organizations to the TBT Committee also regularly report on their technical
assistance activities in the context of their general updates under the
standing agenda item "Observers". For example, during the last
meeting of the TBT Committee held in November 2024, the TBT Committee
heard updates on capacity building activities from International Bureau of
Weights and Measures (BIPM)[29],
International Organization for Standardization (ISO)[30],
African Organisation for Standardisation (ARSO)[31]
and United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD).[32]
3.3 Domestic
coordination
3.13.
Domestic coordination on TBT matters,
including collaboration with the private sector and other relevant stakeholders,
is essential to ensure effective implementation, to engage in a timely manner
with trading partners regarding regulatory developments and to fully realize
the benefits of the TBT Agreement. By aligning efforts across government
agencies and engaging with relevant stakeholders, Members can streamline
resources, enhance transparency, and facilitate safe trade. Coordination also
supports regulatory alignment, reduces duplication of efforts, and promotes
better compliance with international standards, benefiting both the public and
private sectors.
3.14. Members
have been exchanging experiences and discussing good practices for domestic
coordination during thematic sessions. For
example, the thematic session held in July 2022 aimed to identify key
ingredients for effective and sustainable domestic coordination mechanisms and
also addressed how digital tools such as ePing could be leveraged to support
effective, inclusive and timely domestic coordination. Members also shared
their experiences with domestic coordination during the thematic session held in
February 2021.[33]
3.4 Guidelines
on conformity assessment procedures
3.15. In
March 2024, Members adopted Non‑prescriptive practical guidelines to
support regulators in the choice and design of appropriate and proportionate
conformity assessment procedures.[34] These
guidelines help regulators in developing or adopting appropriate procedures for
determining whether products fulfil the requirements established by relevant
technical regulations or standards, ensuring that measures to verify compliance
do not create unnecessary obstacles to international trade.
3.16. The
guidelines identify the "development dimension" as one of the nine core
elements for regulators to consider in the choice and design of appropriate and
proportionate conformity assessment procedures. As further elaborated in
Section 2.8 of the guidelines, this involves considering the needs and
difficulties of developing country Members in implementing conformity
assessment procedures, including in terms of developing and maintaining their
national quality infrastructure. Given that economic operators in developing or
least‑developed Members may have limitations in fulfilling certain conformity
procedures, the guidelines state that regulators in other Members may seek to
accommodate these limitations while still taking into account the risks
associated with a product. In this respect, the guidelines also state that,
consistent with Article 11 of the TBT Agreement, Members, if requested,
should provide technical assistance on these matters.
3.5 Thematic
sessions
3.17. The
TBT Committee holds thematic sessions throughout the year which give Members
the opportunity to share experiences and discuss specific regulatory topics. The
topics of the thematic sessions are agreed by Members in the triennial review
reports. The development dimension and the special needs of developing and least
developed countries has been discussed in some of the recent thematic sessions
held by the TBT Committee.[35] For
example, in 2023, Members discussed constraints faced by developing and least‑developed
countries in using digital technologies and tools in implementing good regulatory
practice and the importance of ensuring their effective participation in the
international standard‑setting process.[36]
4 ePing SPS&TBT Platform
4.1. The ePing SPS&TBT Platform, launched in July 2022, consolidates all TBT and SPS transparency
tools, including the former ePing alert system, into a unified platform. This
integration responded to requests from Members in the TBT and SPS Committees for a more streamlined tool, with a specific recommendation from
the TBT Committee to integrate various TBT tools into a more comprehensive and
centralized platform.[37] The ePing SPS&TBT Platform builds on the previous
version of ePing, which was launched in November 2016, and is the result of collaboration between the WTO, the
International Trade Centre (ITC) and the United Nations Department of Economic
and Social Affairs (UNDESA).
4.2. The
ePing SPS&TBT Platform supports the implementation
of transparency disciplines under the TBT and SPS Agreements and facilitates
access to SPS‑ and TBT‑related information. Members, as well as any
interested stakeholder, can be a user of ePing to consult SPS and TBT
notifications, specific trade concerns and other Committee documents, as well
as the contact information of enquiry points and notification authorities. They
can also subscribe to receive email alerts on notifications of interest and
reach out to notification authorities and enquiry point officials of other
Members through the platform. Officials with additional rights can use ePing to
submit notifications to the WTO. Currently, more than 99% of SPS and TBT
notifications are submitted through ePing. The single sign‑on system allows
seamless access from ePing to eAgenda for those with the necessary credentials.
In response to two specific requests submitted by Members in the TBT Committee,
two features in ePing were enhanced to allow officials with additional
rights to, on a voluntary basis, disseminate information on comments submitted
on notifications[38]
or share unofficial translations.[39] The
ePing SPS&TBT Platform also contains video
tutorials which are meant to help users to better navigate through the platform
and utilize its functions.
4.3. The Secretariat continuously improves this
platform in response to the needs of Members. Most recently, the
Secretariat has begun piloting an unofficial translation service into English,
French and Spanish for notified regulations, addressing one of the specific TBT
Committee recommendations in this regard.[40] Given
the 60‑day comment period provided in most notifications, swift access to
translations of notified draft regulations and related text is crucial for
timely engagement on regulatory developments.
4.4. Currently,
almost 25,000 users are registered on the ePing SPS&TBT Platform, with 46%
representing the public sector, 40% the private sector, 9% academia or non‑governmental
organizations, and 5% representing both the public and private sector (See
chart 2 below).
4.1.1.1 Chart
2– Registered ePing users by sector
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95585/95585d7d6e89f7529c5e415e0700dba281c6e883" alt=""
5 Capacity
building
5.1 WTO
technical assistance
5.1. According
to the WTO 2023 Technical Assistance Annual Report, in the last three
biennial technical assistance and training plans, covering the period 2018‑2023,
Members identified TBT and SPS as the main priority areas for technical
assistance, continuing the trend of previous years.[41] TBT and
SPS are also among the top three topics in beneficiaries' technical assistance
priorities for 2024‑2025.[42]
5.2. Responding
to this high level of interest from Members, in the period 2013 to 2023, the WTO Secretariat
has trained around 23,000 participants in the areas of TBT and SPS,
constituting 25% of the total number of participants trained in topic‑specific WTO
TA activities.[43]
5.3. WTO's technical assistance activities in the TBT
area aim at increasing participants' awareness about rights and obligations
under the TBT Agreement and its implications at the national level. In the organization of TBT technical
assistance activities, the levels of familiarity with the TBT Agreement
and advancement in its implementation are taken into consideration in meeting
and responding to individual country/regional needs. The programmes of national/regional activities
may include presentations on the disciplines and obligations under the TBT
Agreement, transparency framework, dispute settlement, implementation challenges, STCs, Good
Regulatory Practice, the work of the TBT Committee, and digital tools, among
others.
5.4. In
2022‑2023, the Secretariat organized a total of 25 TBT‑specific technical
assistance (TBT TA) activities: 21 national and 3 regional workshops and 1
Geneva‑based activity (some of these, in particular in 2022, were delivered
virtually).[44]
In 2024, a total of 23 TBT TA activities were delivered, including 9 national
and 6 regional workshops as well as 8 ePing‑specific training sessions.[45] The
regional workshops delivered in 2024, some in partnership with other agencies,
covered the following regions: Africa, the Caribbean, Central and Eastern
Europe, Central Asia and the Caucasus (CEECAC), Latin America, and the Middle
East. In recent years, the following trends stand out: (i) a sharp
increase in demand and delivery of TBT TA after the end of the COVID‑19 pandemic
(the number of TA delivered in 2024 was almost the same as that delivered in
2022 and 2023, combined); (ii) an increasing focus on the topics of
transparency and ePing; and (iii) more delivery of joint SPS‑TBT
activities.
5.5. In
2022, the Secretariat held the first edition of the TBT and SPS Transparency
Champions Courses. The goal of this new programme was to bring about
concrete and sustainable results in operationalizing the transparency framework
of the WTO. These
courses aimed to equip participants with the comprehensive knowledge and
practical skills to implement and benefit from the WTO's TBT and SPS
transparency framework.[46]
5.6. The
first cohort of the TBT programme included 26 officials from African countries
with responsibilities for TBT transparency procedures. The first week of the
course was held at the WTO in October 2022[47],
where each participant developed an action plan to be implemented upon return
to their capital. The programme continued with a series of virtual sessions to complement
the topics covered during the first week and exchange updates with the
implementation of action plans. The programme concluded in Nairobi, Kenya in April 2023[48],
where participants reported on their action plans. The programme also
benefitted from contributions from "mentor" Enquiry Points as well as
from ARSO. Following the programme, some of the "champions" became
active participants in the work of the TBT Committee and its Transparency
Working Group.
5.7. The
initial results of the Transparency Champions programmes, as evaluated by
ITTC's Monitoring and Evaluation Section, showed that they achieved their
objectives. They have contributed substantially to the creation of a pool of
TBT and SPS experts with a sound knowledge of transparency issues and the
functioning of the competent authorities. The programmes fostered changes in
Members, leading to a better implementation of the Agreements through more
notifications and improved timing and completeness, but also to enhanced
internal coordination and more efficient use of digital tools to manage
communication with stakeholders. In addition, participants gained more self‑confidence
and strengthened their communication skills and networks. These "portable"
skills can be used in many different circumstances, increasing the return of
the programmes for the beneficiary countries.
5.2 STDF
5.8. The
Standards and Trade Development
Facility (STDF) is a global partnership, established by the WTO, together
with FAO, WHO, WOAH and the World Bank Group, that promotes improved food
safety, animal and plant health capacity in developing countries.[49] In
June 2024, the STDF Working Group approved STDF/PG/1000:
"Improving the use of the ePing SPS&TBT Platform to Enhance
Transparency for Market Access", a project that will be implemented by the
WTO.[50] While
STDF projects normally focus on SPS matters, this project will take a more
holistic approach to regulatory transparency and involve entities and
stakeholders with an interest in both SPS and TBT matters. By improving
transparency and accessibility of SPS and TBT measures, the project aims to
enhance clarity, predictability, and regulatory coordination on SPS and TBT
regulations affecting trade, through an increased uptake of ePing in five
beneficiary countries (Kenya, Namibia, South Africa, Tanzania and Uganda).
Through technological enhancements of the ePing platform and new capacity
building approaches, the project seeks to make it easier for public and private
sector users to keep abreast of and communicate on SPS and TBT measures
affecting trade.
5.3 Resources
5.9. The
Secretariat has prepared several TBT‑related publications, including the
following:
a._
Technical
Barriers to Trade Agreement: 10 key results from 2023;
b._
The WTO
Agreements Series: Technical Barriers to Trade (Third Edition);
c._
WTO
TBT Enquiry Point Guide: Making transparency work; and,
d._
Technical
Cooperation Handbook on Notification Requirements: TBT Section.
5.10. Additional
technical assistance and transparency‑related materials are available here:
a._
TBT
Committee Transparency Working Group;
b._
Technical
Barriers to Trade – Members' transparency toolkit; and,
c._
Technical
Barriers to Trade — events, workshops and training.
6 Looking
ahead
6.1. At its 5‑8 November 2024 meeting,
the TBT Committee completed its Tenth Triennial Review of the Operation and
Implementation of the TBT Agreement and adopted a set
of recommendations for work over the next three years.[51] These
recommendations were based on proposals submitted by Members to the TBT
Committee in the course of the triennial review process and cover various
issues and topics including those relating to transparency, technical
assistance, special and differential treatment and the operation of the
Committee.[52]
For instance, the TBT Committee agreed to:
a._
update the Enquiry Point Guide, building on the information gathered in
developing the good practice guide on how to comment on a notification;
b._
discuss the current use of flexibilities in the notification process by
developing and least‑developed‑country Members;
c._
explore ways in which to optimize the use of digital tools to further
facilitate the participation of all Members in the work of the Committee;
d._
hold a thematic session on the experience of developing and least‑developed
country Members in: (i) using flexibilities in the TBT Agreement and the
Decisions and Recommendations of the TBT Committee[53];
(ii) engaging with notifications and submitting or responding to comments;
(iii) raising and addressing specific trade concerns; and,
(iv) engaging with national stakeholders and cross‑agency coordination;
e._
request the Secretariat to report to the Committee on its recent and
planned TBT capacity building efforts, including their geographic distribution
and content, and to develop a questionnaire for Members and Observer
organizations on their recent and planned TBT capacity building efforts,
including their geographic distribution and content, and, based on answers
provided, report back to the Committee;
f._
hold a thematic session on the role of metrology in facilitating trade
and supporting the effective implementation of the TBT Agreement, which may
address barriers to participation by developing and least developed country
Members in the international metrology system and explore practices to overcome
such barriers.
g._
encourage the following practices with a view to increasing engagement in
thematic sessions:
i._
Before the event, to: (i)
announce the moderators and the draft programme as early as possible, but at
least 20 working days prior to the session; (ii) encourage Members to propose
speakers as soon as possible and to limit the number of speakers proposed to
two; (iii) in composing the panels, to consider diversity, inclusivity and the
special challenges faced by developing and least‑developed country Members; (iv)
engage with the audience prior to the session, for example, by providing
guiding questions; and, (v) use social media for awareness raising about the
upcoming session;
ii._
During the event, to: (i)
consider the use of a variety of formats such as roundtables, question‑and‑answer
panels; (ii) limit the time given to – and the total number of – speakers in
each session; and (iii) increase the use of digital tools for audience
engagement (such as real‑time polls);
iii._
After the event, to request the
Secretariat to seek ways of enhancing the circulation and dissemination of
information regarding the thematic sessions, as well as means of making such
information more accessible online (e.g. through the use of tags and keywords,
as well as social media channels);
h._
hold joint thematic sessions with other WTO bodies on topics of relevance
to the TBT Agreement, based on proposals from Members and in coordination with
relevant other WTO bodies. Possible topics could include, among others,
TBT‑related technical assistance discussed in the Committee on Trade and
Development (CTD); and
i._
hold a thematic session in which Members could exchange experiences on
how certain STCs are resolved and share good practices that support the
expedited resolution of STCs.
__________
[1] This
is the report by the Chair of the TBT Committee, Daniela García, to the Special
Session of the Committee on Trade and Development.
[3] See
summary of discussions in _TN/CTD/38.
[5] See
statement by the Facilitator and interventions at 60th CTD SS of 23
November 2023 (pages 5-11 of _TN/CTD/M/60).
See also statement by the facilitator contained in document _JOB/TN/CTD/5.
[6] This
report also contains relevant information responding to the request made at the
formal CTD SS meeting on 11 October 2024.
[8] For
a detailed description of key provisions, committee practices and jurisprudence
related to S&DT in the TBT Agreement, see _WT/COMTD/W/271
(16 March 2023), pp. 41‑53.
[12] The
latest revision is contained in _G/TBT/1/Rev.15.
[14] _G/TBT/46,
paras. 6.29 and 7.13.
[15] A
"state
of play document" updated regularly by the Secretariat indicates the
specific follow up actions on each of the 19 recommendations.
[19] The
work on the good practice guide was led by a volunteer sub-group of Enquiry
Points from Australia, Kenya, Namibia, Peru, the Philippines, South Africa and
the United States.
[20] All
current notification formats and guidelines are compiled in _G/TBT/GEN/388.
A volunteer sub‑group, composed of Australia, Namibia, Paraguay, the United
Kingdom, and the United States, has been reviewing and proposing updates to the
notification formats and guidelines, for further consideration in the
Transparency Working Group and the TBT Committee.
[23] The
latest Annual Review report is available in _G/TBT/53.
[24] _G/TBT/53,
para. 3.11.
[25] Data
up to 27 November 2024.
[26] For
further details on specific trade concerns, see Section 4 of _G/TBT/53.
[27] For
technical assistance provided by the WTO Secretariat, see section 5.1. of the
document.
[28] See
_G/TBT/M/86
para. 4.1, _G/TBT/M/87 para. 3.1, _G/TBT/M/88 para. 3.3; _G/TBT/M/91 para. 3.1; _G/TBT/M/92
para. 5.1.
[35] See
_G/TBT/GEN/367;
_G/TBT/GEN/352;
_G/TBT/GEN/351;
_G/TBT/GEN/331.
[36] _G/TBT/GEN/367;
_G/TBT/GEN/352.
[37] _G/TBT/46, para. 6.29.a.i.
[38] _G/TBT/46, para. 6.29.b.i.
[39] _G/TBT/46, para. 6.29.e.i.
[40] _G/TBT/46, para. 6.29.e.ii.
[44] _G/TBT/50;
_G/TBT/53.
[52] _G/TBT/56,
paras. 3.11, 3.13, 3.15 and 3.17.
[53] These
are contained in the G/TBT/1/Rev-series; _G/TBT/1/Rev.15
is the latest.