report
(2015) of the committee on trade and development
1 introduction
1.1. This report covers the work of the Committee on Trade and
Development (CTD) in 2015. An overview is provided of the work of the CTD's
Regular Session, the Dedicated Session on the Monitoring Mechanism on Special
and Differential Treatment, the Dedicated Sessions on Preferential Trade
Arrangements and Small Economies, the CTD's work on Aid for Trade, and the work
of the Sub-Committee on Least Developed Countries.[1]
2 regular
session
2.1. The CTD in Regular Session held five formal meetings on 16 March (93rd
Session), 28 May (94th Session), 9 June (95th Session),
23 September (96th Session) and 13 November 2015 (97th Session).
The minutes of these meetings are contained in documents WT/COMTD/M/93, WT/COMTD/M/94,
WT/COMTD/M/95, WT/COMTD/M/96 and WT/COMTD/M/97[2],
respectively.
2.2. At the 93rd Session, the Committee elected Ambassador
Roderick van Schreven (Netherlands) as the Chairman of the Sub-Committee on
Least Developed Countries for 2015. Ambassador Bassirou Sene (Senegal) was
elected Chairman of the CTD. Members were subsequently informed, at the General
Council meeting of 5 May 2015, of Ambassador Sene's departure from Geneva. The
94th Session of the CTD was accordingly convened in order to elect a
new CTD Chairperson. At that meeting, Ambassador Juan Esteban Aguirre Martínez (Paraguay)
was elected Chairman of the CTD.
2.3. Members agreed to continue to invite a number of intergovernmental
organizations (IGOs) on an ad hoc meeting-by-meeting basis. A full list of
intergovernmental organizations with observer status in the Committee is
contained in document WT/COMTD/W/22/Rev.7. The CTD continues to have
outstanding requests for observer status from the League of Arab States, the
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), the Gulf Organization
for Industrial Consulting (GOIC), the Organisation internationale de la
Francophonie, the Common Fund for Commodities (CFC), the Organization of Arab
Petroleum Exporting Countries (OAPEC) and the Groupe de la Banque Africaine de
Développement.
2.4. At the 95th Session, the Committee was informed under "Other Business" of simplifications to the
preferential rules of origin in Japan’s Generalized System of Preferences (GSP)
scheme with respect to knitted apparel.[3]
Also under "Other Business", the delegation of the Philippines
reported on the outcomes of the May 2015 meeting of the Asia-Pacific Economic
Cooperation (APEC) Ministers Responsible for Trade (MRT).
2.5. The principal areas addressed by
the CTD in Regular Session during the period covered in this report included
the following:
·
technical cooperation and training;
·
notifications regarding market access for developing and least developed
countries (LDCs);
·
report of the Joint Advisory Group on the
International Trade Centre UNCTAD/WTO;
·
trade and development - work in the Committee
on the basis of the Chairman's concluding statement from the Eighth Ministerial
Conference (MC8);
·
duty-free and quota-free (DFQF) market access
for LDCs;
·
participation of developing countries in the
multilateral trading system.
2.1 Technical cooperation and
training
2.6. At the 95th Session, the Committee took note of the 2014
Annual Report on Technical Assistance and Training (WT/COMTD/W/209). According
to the report, close to 14,700 participants were trained during the year,
representing an increase of 7% relative to 2013. The volume of activities and
the related expenses remained stable during the year. Participation in
face-to-face activities was lower, but this reduction was more than compensated
for by the growth in on-line courses, which for the first time accounted for
more than 50% of the participants. Progress continued on the implementation of
the new technical assistance result-based management system. The Secretariat
worked to further improve the substantive content of its technical assistance
offer. An assessment of the Advanced and Regional Trade Policy Course
programmes was conducted in 2014 and several recommendations for improvement
were made. In terms of results, the report showed that the technical assistance
activities remained successful in 2014: the success rate in e-Learning courses
stood at 61%, whilst that rate was significantly higher in face‑to-face
activities (up to 97% in Regional Trade Policy Courses). Other results measured
during the year included those concerning support provided to the accession
process, to the production of improved services statistics and to the
implementation of the Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA). At the 97th Session,
the Committee adopted the Biennial Technical Assistance and Training Plan for
2016 and 2017 (WT/COMTD/W/211). In addition, a statement providing information
on the external evaluation of the WTO's trade-related technical assistance was
made by Norway, on behalf of the Steering Committee of the evaluation. The
draft Terms of Reference for the evaluation were circulated in document
JOB/DEV/30.[4]
2.2 Notifications regarding
market access for developing and least developed countries
2.7. In 2015, notifications under the Enabling Clause were made concerning
the GSP schemes of the European Union (EU) (WT/COMTD/N/4/Add.7) and Japan
(WT/COMTD/N/2/Add.16). In addition, Thailand notified to the CTD its DFQF
market access scheme for LDCs (WT/COMTD/N/46),[5] and
India circulated updated information relating to its Duty-Free Tariff
Preference Scheme for LDCs (WT/COMTD/N/38/Add.1).[6]
With regard to regional trade agreements (RTAs), notifications under the
Enabling Clause were made concerning the Agreement between Singapore and the
Gulf Cooperation Council (WT/COMTD/N/45/Rev.1), and the Agreement between
Mauritius and Pakistan (WT/COMTD/N/47).
2.8. The RTA notifications concerning the Gulf Cooperation Council
Customs Union, the ASEAN‑Korea Agreement and the India-Korea Agreement remained
on the CTD's agenda during 2015. The communication from China, Egypt and India
titled "Systemic and specific issues arising out of the dual notification
of the Gulf Cooperation Council Customs Union" (WT/COMTD/W/175) also
remained on the agenda. A number of interventions were made on both substance
and procedure. Divergent views were expressed on how to deal with the issues
relating to the RTAs notified under both the Enabling Clause and GATT Article
XXIV and their implications.
2.3 Report of the Joint Advisory
Group on the International Trade Centre UNCTAD/WTO
2.9. The Joint Advisory Group (JAG) on the International Trade Centre
UNCTAD/WTO (ITC) held its 49th Session on 26 June 2015. The report
on that meeting is contained in document ITC/AG/(XLIX)/260. Ambassador Patricia
O'Brien (Ireland), the Chairperson of the JAG, presented the report to the CTD
at its 97th Session. She said, inter alia, that JAG members had
expressed appreciation for the ITC's renewed focus on innovation,
effectiveness, and pragmatic results on the ground. Support for the ITC's new
strategic direction, as laid out in the Strategic Plan for 2015-2017, was
confirmed. The Committee took note of the JAG report
and forwarded it to the General Council for adoption.
2.4 Trade and development - work
in the Committee on the basis of the Chairman's concluding statement from the
Eighth Ministerial Conference
2.10. At MC8, Ministers, inter alia, reaffirmed
the positive link between trade and development and called for focused work in
the CTD. Ministers called on Members to fully operationalize the mandate of the
CTD as a focal point for development work. At the 93rd Session, the
Committee considered a new proposal for work under the MC8 mandate, circulated
by Barbados, Belize, China, Cuba, Ecuador, India and the African Group
(WT/COMTD/W/208). It was noted that the proposal, which is for the CTD to
report on development-related activities and development issues raised in other
WTO bodies, was a joint effort by the proponents of two previous proposals with
broadly similar aims, contained in documents WT/COMTD/W/192 (circulated by
China, Cuba, Ecuador, India and the African Group) and WT/COMTD/W/202
(circulated by Barbados, Belize, Benin, Botswana, Kenya, Lesotho and
Mauritius). Also at the 93rd Session, the Committee continued its
consideration of the outstanding proposal in document WT/COMTD/W/192, which is
for the CTD to make a recommendation for the parties to RTAs to submit their
notification and information requirements jointly, and of the proposal by
Ecuador contained in document WT/COMTD/W/204, which is for the Secretariat to
periodically update its document on the implementation of S&D provisions.
At the 95th and 97th Sessions, consideration of the
outstanding proposals in documents WT/COMTD/W/192 and WT/COMTD/W/208 continued.
The Committee also continued its consideration of the proposal in document
WT/COMTD/W/204 at the 95th Session and, at the 97th
Session, agreed to a revised version of the proposal, contained in document
WT/COMTD/W/204/Rev.1. The Chairman encouraged Members to consider ways in which
the CTD could advance in its work relating to the MC8 mandate.
2.5 Duty-free and quota-free
market access for LDCs
2.11. An item concerning DFQF market
access for LDCs was listed on the agendas of the 93rd, 95th
and 97th Sessions. In addition, a special meeting of the CTD (the 96th
Session) was convened specifically to discuss DFQF-related issues. At the 93rd
Session, a number of Members provided updates on the implementation of their
DFQF schemes. At the 95th Session, Bangladesh, the LDC Coordinator,
made a request for a CTD meeting devoted to the matter of DFQF market access
for LDCs. The Ambassador of Bangladesh subsequently circulated two
communications - contained in documents WT/COMTD/W/210 and WT/COMTD/W/210/Add.1
– providing the background and rationale for such a meeting. The 96th Session was convened to
discuss DFQF market access for LDCs. The meeting provided an opportunity for Members
to have an in‑depth
exchange on the issues involved with the implementation of DFQF market access
for LDC products. Discussion on a possible way forward
focused on a "clinical examination" of the issues involved and
possible impact arising from the implementation of DFQF market access for LDCs,
on the basis of a study prepared by the Secretariat. The Chairman subsequently
undertook informal consultations with interested delegations in order to define
the parameters of such a study. He reported at the 97th Session that
his consultations had not succeeded in finding convergence on the parameters of
the study. Nonetheless he encouraged Members to take forward the DFQF discussion in the context of
the Tenth Ministerial Conference (MC10). Also at the 97th
Session, the Committee
conducted its annual DFQF review on the basis of the Secretariat report
circulated in document WT/COMTD/W/214, which was prepared in the context of the
mandate given in the Bali Ministerial Decision on
DFQF market access for LDCs (WT/MIN(13)/44 - WT/L/919).
2.6 Participation of developing countries in the multilateral trading
system
2.12. In order to assist the Committee with its requirement to keep under
continuous review the participation of developing country Members in the
multilateral trading system, the Secretariat prepared a report (WT/COMTD/W/212)
highlighting salient features concerning the participation of developing
economies in the global trading system. The findings of the report were
presented to the Committee at its 97th Session. The Committee took
note of the report.
3 dedicated
session on the monitoring mechanism on special and differential treatment
3.1. The Dedicated Session on the Monitoring Mechanism on Special and
Differential Treatment held two formal meetings during 2015, on 9 June and on 13
November 2015, both chaired by Ambassador Juan Esteban Aguirre Martínez (Paraguay).
The minutes of these meetings are contained in documents WT/COMTD/MMSDT/M/3 and
WT/COMTD/MMSDT/M/4[7],
respectively. At the June Session, the Chairman made a statement which recalled
key elements of the Bali Ministerial Decision which established the Monitoring
Mechanism (WT/MIN(13)/45 - WT/L/920). At the November Session, the Chairman
reminded Members that, according to the Decision, the monitoring of special and
differential provisions is to be undertaken on the basis of written inputs or
submissions made by them, as well as on the basis of reports received from
other WTO bodies, to which submissions by Members could also be made. In this
light, he once again called on Members to make written submissions.
4 dedicated
session on preferential trade arrangements
4.1. The 2nd Dedicated Session on Preferential Trade
Arrangements was held on 9 June 2015 and was chaired by Ambassador Juan Esteban
Aguirre Martínez (Paraguay). The minutes of the meeting are contained in
document WT/COMTD/PTA/M/2. The Committee considered Chile's DFQF scheme for
LDCs (G/C/W/695-WT/COMTD/N/44, G/C/W/695/Add.1/Rev.1-WT/COMTD/N/44/Add.1/Rev.1,
WT/COMTD/PTA/2/1, WT/COMTD/PTA/2/2, WT/COMD/PTA/2/3), as per the provisions of
the 14 December 2010 General Council Decision on a Transparency Mechanism for Preferential
Trade Arrangements (WT/L/806).
5 dedicated
session on small economies
5.1. Pursuant to paragraph 35 of the
Doha Ministerial Declaration, the General Council, at its meeting on 1 March
2002, took note of the framework and procedures for the conduct of the Work Programme
on Small Economies. The CTD was instructed to oversee this programme of work in
dedicated sessions. At the 2005 Hong Kong Ministerial Conference, Ministers
reaffirmed their commitment to the Work Programme on Small Economies and urged
the adoption of specific measures that would facilitate the fuller integration
of small, vulnerable economies (SVEs) into the multilateral trading system,
without creating a sub-category of WTO Members. At Ministerial Conferences held
in 2009, 2011 and 2013, Ministers instructed the CTD to continue the work in
Dedicated Session and to monitor progress of the small economies' proposals in
the negotiating groups and other bodies.
5.2. In 2015,
the CTD in Dedicated Session held two formal meetings on the Work Programme on
Small Economies on 5 June and 29 October, chaired by Ambassador Juan Esteban Aguirre Martínez (Paraguay). The minutes of these meetings are contained
in document WT/COMTD/SE/M/29 and WT/COMTD/SE/M/30.[8] At the 29th Dedicated Session, the Secretariat presented
its research paper on "Challenges and Opportunities experienced by Small
Economies when linking into Global Value Chains in Trade in Goods and
Services" (WT/COMTD/SE/W/31). Members exchanged initial views on the paper
and its findings. At the 30th Dedicated Session, Members addressed the research paper
prepared by the Secretariat in greater detail and focused on challenges small
economies encounter when linking into global value chains (GVCs) in the
agri-food and seafood sectors. Presentations were made by the ITC and the
Standards and Trade Development Facility (STDF). Members also took note of a
revised compilation paper in WT/COMTD/SE/W/22/Rev.7, which monitors progress of
the proposals submitted by the SVEs to the negotiating groups and other WTO
bodies. Also at the 30th Session, Members adopted the Dedicated
Session's report to the General Council and agreed to forward it as document
WT/COMTD/SE/9 to the General Council for proposed action by Ministers at MC10.
6 AID FOR TRADE
6.1. The CTD held three sessions on Aid for Trade in 2015, on 17
February, 29 May, and 30 October. The February meeting was
exceptionally chaired by Ambassador Christopher Onyanga Aparr
(Uganda). The other meetings were chaired by Ambassador Juan Esteban
Aguirre Martínez (Paraguay). The minutes of the meetings are
contained in documents WT/COMTD/AFT/M/33, WT/COMTD/AFT/M/34, and
WT/COMTD/AFT/M/35, respectively. The Fifth Global Review of Aid for Trade (5GR)
was held on 30 June to 2 July 2015. Aid for Trade was also
included as an agenda item for discussion at the General Council on 27 to 28 July
2015, and the Chairman of the General Council made a statement on Aid for Trade
at the Council meeting of 8 October 2015.
6.2. Three dedicated thematic workshops were held under the auspices of
the CTD as follows: Workshop on Aid for Trade and Infrastructure: Bridging the
Gap on 16 February which served to illustrate how poor infrastructure
negatively impacts developing countries' trade performance and economic growth;
Workshop on the 2015 Aid-for-Trade Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Exercise
and Aid for Trade at a Glance publication on 28 May at which, based on the
results of the Aid for Trade M&E exercise were presented and an overview
given of the main conclusions of the Aid for Trade at a Glance publication; and
Workshop on the Sustainable Development Goals, Addis Ababa Action Agenda
and the Aid-for-Trade Initiative on 29 October at which discussions
focused on the implications for the Aid-for-Trade Initiative of the UN's 2030
Agenda for Sustainable Development. Reports on the workshops were given at the
CTD Aid-for-Trade formal sessions.
6.3. At the CTD's 33rd Session, the Director-General and the
Secretariat provided information on the preparations for the 5GR on
"Reducing Trade Costs for Inclusive, Sustainable Growth" and on the
Aid for Trade M&E exercise. The Director-General outlined his thoughts on
the 5GR and noted that engagement by Members in the M&E exercise
demonstrated continuing demand for the Aid‑for-Trade Initiative. The
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) provided preliminary
data on the 2013 Aid-for-Trade flows. The African Development Bank (AfDB),
Canada, the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), the International Islamic
Trade Finance Corporation, the United Nations Conference on Trade and
Development (UNCTAD), the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for
Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP) and the World Bank Group (WBG) all reported on
their Aid-for-Trade-related operations and support. Chinese Taipei and the Secretariat
of the General Treaty on Central American Economic Integration shared
information on their regional Aid-for-Trade‑related projects in Central
America. Pursuant to its Trade Policy Review (TPR), the United States (US)
provided information on its support to trade capacity building and trade
facilitation. The Enhanced Integrated Framework (EIF) reported on progress in
the implementation of its work in supporting trade mainstreaming and informed
the Committee of the conclusions and recommendations of the Comprehensive
Evaluation of the EIF conducted in 2014. The ITC provided an update on its
technical assistance activities, including in relation to trade facilitation,
and informed of future ITC events.
6.4. At the CTD's 34th Session, the Director-General and the
Secretariat updated the Committee on the preparations for the 5GR. The
Director-General highlighted the importance and relevance of the event for the
global community and for the UN's Post-2015 Development Agenda. Japan and
Australia updated the Committee on their Aid-for-Trade-related activities and
support pursuant to their TPRs, and the EIF reported on the Programme Framework
of Phase Two (2016-2022) of the EIF. The Asian Development Bank (AsDB)
presented a draft of the publication "Aid for Trade in Asia and the
Pacific 2015" that would be launched at the 5GR and the ITC reported on
its ongoing technical assistance support, notably in connection with the TFA.
The Secretariat provided reports on an Expert Group Meeting organized by ECOWAS
and on a Regional Review Seminar organized by the Islamic Development Bank.
6.5. The 5GR took place from 30 June to 2 July 2015.[9]
A total of 52
Ministers, Deputy Ministers, Heads and Deputy Heads of IGOs, and 20 Heads of
private sector enterprises, participated in the event. Various
reports were launched for the 5GR, including the joint OECD-WTO publication
"Aid for Trade at a Glance 2015: Reducing Trade Costs for Inclusive,
Sustainable Growth".[10] The 18 plenary sessions were structured around the theme
"Reducing Trade Costs for Inclusive, Sustainable Growth" with Trade
Facilitation being a main focus over the three-day event. Twenty‑eight side events were also
organized by WTO Members, IGOs, and non-governmental organizations. In the
opening plenary session, keynote speeches delivered by WBG President
Jim Yong Kim, OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría,
AsDB President Takehiko Nakao, and UNCTAD Deputy Secretary‑General
Joakim Reiter, underscored how action on reducing trade costs and support to
more inclusive trade can promote developing country – and particularly LDC –
economic growth and poverty reduction, a message that was also echoed by the
representatives of the regional development banks and the ITC. Another plenary session was dedicated to
MC10, where Director-General Roberto Azevêdo and Kenyan Ambassador and Cabinet
Secretary Amina Mohamed offered thoughts on how the WTO could map a way
forward to MC10.
6.6. Other
sessions were tailored to discuss the issue of trade costs in relation to, inter alia, gender, services, SVEs, sanitary and
phytosanitary measures, South-South trade, e‑commerce, and LDCs' services and
merchandise trade development. A
funding commitment was made by Norway to Phase Two of the EIF, an
announcement of funding for the STDF was made by Sweden, and Japan recalled its
substantial funding commitment to infrastructure investment in Asia over the
next five years. Key messages that emerged from the 5GR
included: the development benefits of the implementation of the TFA; the
economic opportunity of e-commerce, and the negative impact of non-tariff
measures on raising costs for trade in goods. In the closing plenary session, 25
Members and five IGOs took the floor to make individual or group statements.
Many delegations noted the relevance and focus of the 5GR and suggested themes
that could be addressed by the Aid-for-Trade Initiative in future, together
with issues of access to Aid-for-Trade funding. In his closing remarks, the
Director-General underlined the clear message emerging from the Global Review
that trade costs matter and that trade connectivity would be a key element in
delivering the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Aid for Trade was
delivering but Members needed to remain flexible and open‑minded about how the
Initiative could do more and what future priorities should be. He highlighted
the importance of, and benefits from, implementation of the TFA.
6.7. Aid for Trade was discussed at the General Council on 27 to 28 July
2015. In his report of the 5GR, the Director‑General noted its timely focus,
particularly given the ongoing work to implement the TFA, and how the 5GR had
defined how trade could contribute to the development outcomes all Members were
seeking. He also noted the profile that had been given to the Pacific, a region
particularly challenged by high trade costs due to its geographical remoteness.
The Director‑General underlined that the outcomes of MC10 would need to be
factored into the process for moving the Initiative forward and that Members
should "keep it going and remain creative". The report of the July
General Council debate is contained in document WT/GC/M/158. In his statement
to the General Council on 8 October 2015, the General Council Chairman
echoed the points made by the Director-General and recalled that the 5GR had provided
an opportunity to discuss the economic and development impact of high trade
costs – notably on the poorest countries and citizens, and on achievement of
the 2030 Sustainable Development agenda. He noted that a new biennial
Aid-for-Trade work programme would be developed after MC10. The report of the
October General Council debate is contained in document WT/GC/M/159.[11]
6.8. At the CTD's 35th Session, the EIF and WBG provided information
on their Aid‑for‑Trade‑related activities, in particular the joint WBG-WTO publication
"The Role of Trade in Ending Poverty". The EU provided information on
its Accountability Report 2015 on Financing for Development, TFA implementation
support and informed of the recently-published new EU trade strategy
"Trade for All". China reported on its South-South cooperation
support highlighting the newly-established South-South Cooperation Fund, its
China‑LDC Accession Programme, and its aim to increase investment in developing
countries. Guatemala (on behalf of the SVEs) called for further study and
analysis of the challenges faced by SVEs in accessing GVCs. A number of Members
reported on their Aid-for-Trade-related activities and support pursuant to
their TPRs. India updated on its development assistance and noted several new
initiatives aimed at scaling up its development partnership with Africa. Canada
provided information on its global, regional, bilateral and civil society level
support, as well as its TFA support, and New Zealand outlined its Aid-for-Trade
support, in particular for Pacific Island countries, and on its
recently-launched Aid Programme Strategic Plan for 2015-2019. Angola called for
increased technical assistance support for diversification of export products,
development of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), and for enhancing
business data availability. The
ITC also reported on its activities.
6.9. Under "Other Business", the Chairman provided initial
thoughts on how to take forward the Aid-for-Trade Initiative and suggested that
a new work programme be elaborated on the basis of discussions with Members in
informal and formal sessions, as necessary, with the aim of submitting a work
programme – under his own responsibility – to the General Council before its
second meeting in 2016. The Chairman also recalled the Bali Ministerial
Decision on Aid for Trade and noted that, if Members were so minded, a similar
decision on Aid for Trade could be agreed for MC10. Such a decision, if
required, could recall that: Members take note of the deliberations and
outcomes of the Fifth Global Review of Aid for Trade on Reducing Trade Costs
for Inclusive Sustainable Growth, reaffirm the continuing need for Aid for
Trade, and recommend the development of a new Aid-for-Trade work programme for
2016-2017. He also encouraged Members to feed in elements they deemed
appropriate on Aid for Trade into the on-going process of consultations on a
Ministerial Declaration for MC10. No comments were made by Members.
7 sub-committee
on least developed countries
7.1. In 2015, the Sub-Committee on Least Developed Countries (hereafter
the Sub-Committee) held three formal meetings on 2 April (74th
Session), 18 September (75th Session) and 12 October (76th Session),
chaired by Ambassador Roderick van Schreven (Netherlands). The minutes of the
meetings are contained in documents WT/COMTD/LDC/M/74, WT/COMTD/LDC/M/75 and
WT/COMTD/LDC/M/76[12],
respectively. The Sub-Committee took up the following subjects pursuant to the
WTO Work Programme for the LDCs (WT/COMTD/LDC/11/Rev.1): (i) market access
for LDCs; (ii) trade-related technical assistance and capacity-building
initiatives for LDCs; and (iii) accession of LDCs. The other subjects
considered included: follow-up to Ministerial Decisions/Declarations; a report
by the LDC Coordinator on the LDC Group Retreat held in February; and a
briefing by the Secretariat on the arrangements for LDCs' participation at
MC10. At all meetings, the delegation of Bangladesh acted as the Coordinator of
the LDC Group.
7.2. As part of the commemoration of the WTO's 20th anniversary,
the Secretariat organized an LDC event titled "Twenty Years of Supporting
the Integration of Least Developed Countries into the Multilateral Trading
System". The event took place under the aegis of the Sub-Committee on
12 October 2015. A Secretariat Note (WT/COMTD/LDC/W/61) was prepared as an
input to the event, which was opened by WTO Director-General Roberto Azevêdo
and UNCTAD Secretary General Mukhisa Kituyi. Two panel sessions reviewed the
progress made in integrating the LDCs into the multilateral trading system
since the establishment of the WTO in 1995 and discussed how the WTO could help
LDCs overcome the remaining challenges. The report on the event, by the
Chairman, is contained in document WT/COMTD/LDC/24.
7.1 Market access for LDCs
7.3. At the 74th Session, the Secretariat provided an update
on trends in LDC trade, building on the information and analysis provided in
the 2014 market access review Note (WT/COMTD/LDC/W/59). Members welcomed the
update. Some LDCs requested more disaggregated regional and country-specific
data to be included in future editions. At the 75th Session,
Members considered the DFQF market access scheme of Thailand (WT/COMTD/N/46).
The LDCs expressed appreciation to Thailand for adopting the scheme, which
provides DFQF market access on 73.2% of Thailand's tariff lines. At the 76th
Session, Members considered the 2015 market access review Note by the
Secretariat (WT/COMTD/LDC/W/60), which had a special focus on developments of LDC trade since the
establishment of the WTO in 1995. Members considered
the Note useful. The
LDCs, as well as other Members, suggested some elements for possible inclusion
in future editions of the Note.
7.2 Trade-related technical
assistance and capacity-building initiatives for LDCs
7.4. At the 74th Session, the Secretariat gave an overview of
technical assistance and training provided to the LDCs in 2014. The LDCs were
associated with 48% of technical assistance activities undertaken by the
Secretariat in 2014. The LDCs welcomed the continued prioritization of LDCs in
the delivery of the WTO's technical assistance activities, and made a number of
suggestions to further strengthen their human and institutional capacity
building. At the same session, the EIF Secretariat provided an update to the
Sub-Committee on the status of implementation of the EIF. The LDCs reiterated
the usefulness of the programme for their trade capacity building and
encouraged development partners to support the second phase of the EIF. At the
76th Session, the EIF Secretariat provided an update on Phase Two of
the EIF as well as the preparations for the EIF Pledging Conference to be held
on 14 December 2015, prior to MC10. The LDCs welcomed Phase Two of the EIF
and called upon donors to contribute to the replenishment of the EIF Trust
Fund.
7.3 Accession of LDCs
7.5. At the 75th Session, the Secretariat briefed Members on
some key accession-related activities being undertaken and on the state of play
in the eight accession working parties of the LDCs, including that Liberia's
accession process had been concluded and that the accession of Afghanistan was
nearing conclusion. The
LDCs urged for expeditious conclusion of ongoing LDC accessions and suggested a
systematic review of the results of accessions vis-à-vis
the LDC accession guidelines.
7.4 Other matters considered by
the Sub-Committee
7.6. At the 75th Session, the LDCs requested that the
Sub-Committee consider once a year the item concerning follow-up to Ministerial
Decisions/Declarations. The LDC Coordinator also made a proposal for the
Secretariat to prepare a report on the progress made in the implementation of
Ministerial Decisions and Declarations in favour of LDCs. At the 76th
Session, Members agreed that the Secretariat would prepare a factual compilation
of the progress made in the implementation of Ministerial Declarations and
Decisions in favour of LDCs since the establishment of the WTO.
7.7. At the 74th Session, the LDC Coordinator briefed the
Sub-Committee on the LDC Retreat held in Montreux, Switzerland from 17-19
February 2015, where LDCs discussed various issues of LDC interest, including
on how to build on the Bali Decisions towards MC10.
7.8. At the 75th Session, the Secretariat provided a briefing
on the administrative and logistical arrangements by the Secretariat to
facilitate the participation of LDCs at MC10. As per past practice, provisions
had been made to fund three officials from each eligible LDC. The LDCs thanked
Members for their contributions to the LDC Trust Fund established for this
purpose.
__________
[1] There were no meetings in 2015 of the CTD's Dedicated Session on
Regional Trade Agreements. The Special Session of the CTD, dealing with the
issue of special and differential treatment (S&D), has its own reporting channel.
[3] These simplifications were subsequently notified in document
WT/COMTD/N/2/Add.16.
[4] Members were informed at the 93rd Session of
preparations to undertake a comprehensive external evaluation of the WTO’s
trade-related technical assistance. A statement in this regard was made under
“Other Business” by the EU, on behalf of a core group of donors.
[5] A notification of the scheme was also made to the Council for Trade
in Goods (G/C/W/714).
[6] The communication from India was also circulated to the Council for
Trade in Goods (G/C/W/651/Add.1).
[9] A summary report of the 5GR is contained in document
WT/COMTD/AFT/W/58.