Afghanistan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
Albania
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
Australia
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
Amongst the various different
forms of EMC/EMI, only conducted and radiated limits of emissions are
mandatory.
The Technical Construction
File (TCF) can be used in circumstances where it is not feasible to have the
product tested.
|
Bahrain, Kingdom of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
Proof of compliance is
required (to be made available upon request), but no registration/submission
to industry Canada
is required.
Label requirements are
mandatory.
|
China
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colombia
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
Terminal approval
applications must be accompanied by the following documents: (i) proof of
payment made to the Information and Communications Technology Fund for
approval of the terminal
(10 SMMLV); (ii) documentation (FCC Grant) showing that the terminal complies
with FCC Standards 22H and 24E; this certification must be submitted by the
FCC to one of the authorized certification bodies; (iii) statement of
responsibility letter on compliance with the applicable technical standards;
(iv) copy of the terminal's technical specifications and (v) labelling
specifications that allow for verification of the relationship between the
terminal model and the FCCID.
|
Costa Rica
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
The type approval of
equipment operating in the unlicensed band (in accordance with Part 15 of the
Federal Communications Commission -FCC- rules) does not require any kind of
test from third parties. The SUTEL (Superintendencia de
Telecomunicaciones) recognises the FCC or CE certificates.
|
Dominican Republic
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
Egypt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
El Salvador
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
Only compliance with ITU
standard is required.
|
European Union
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
In some cases, the opinion
of a 3rd party needs to be sought, but only where a manufacture
has not applied harmonised standards or these are not available.
|
Georgia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
Guatemala
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
Guatemala does not have
any regulations on IT products or conformity assessment procedures for
IT products.
|
Honduras
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
The procedure is called 'Approval
of Telecommunications Equipment' and it applies to all equipment that is to
be sold and used in telecommunications networks in Honduras. Suppliers cannot
perform these procedures themselves; approval certificates from other
internationally recognized approval bodies are accepted. They are based on
OAS Inter-American Telecommunication Commission (CITEL) resolutions
concerning the mutual recognition of equipment among administrations.[2]
|
Hong Kong, China
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
However, manufactures or
equipment suppliers should ensure that their products are in compliance with
EMC requirements, which are based on CISPR 22.
|
Iceland
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
India
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indonesia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
Israel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
Japan
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
Mandatory requirements are
limited to EMI as for the products covered by Electrical Appliance and
Material Safety Law.
|
Jordan
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kazakhstan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
Korea, Republic of
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kuwait, the State of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
Kyrgyz Republic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
Macao, China
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
Mauritius
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moldova, Republic of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
Montenegro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
Morocco
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
New Zealand
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
Supplier self-declaration
and product labelling are required.
Full mutual recognition
with Australia
applies to labelled products.
Suppliers may perform
these procedures, however, for Group 2 ISM and telecommunications terminal
equipment (TTE), the test facility must be accredited by IANZ or by an
accreditation body having a mutual recognition arrangement with IANZ.
|
Nicaragua
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
Norway
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
Norway follows the
conformity assessment procedures according to Directive 89/336/EEC, Directive
73/23/EEC and Directive 1999/5/EC.
|
Oman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
Panama
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
Peru
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The approval procedure is
carried out by the Peruvian Government through the Ministry of Transport and
Communications, which issues an approval certificate; its purpose is to avoid
electromagnetic interference and ensure electromagnetic compatibility of the
Peruvian spectrum. Thus, the importation, manufacture, construction,
marketing and use of telecommunications equipment and/or appliances that are
connected to a public telecommunications network in order to provide any
telecommunications service and/or are used for radio broadcasting require
approval. This approval is subject to the payment of a processing fee and
applicants must submit a copy of the technical manual with specifications for
the equipment or appliance to be approved, indicating the mark, model, and
name and address of the manufacturer. In a case of domestically produced
telecommunications equipment or appliances, measurements and/or technical
verifications are conducted.
Peru recognizes approval
certificates or similar documents from the United
States and/or Canada as equivalent to its own
approval certificates.
|
Philippines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
Qatar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Information forthcoming.)
|
Russian Federation
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
The procedures are
described in the technical regulation of the Custom Union
"Electromagnetic compatibility of technical means" (adopted by the
Decision of the Commission of the Customs Union No. 879 of 9 December 2011)
and in the regulations on typical schemes of conformity assessment (adopted
by the Decision of the Commission of the Customs Union No. 621 of 7 April 2011).
Procedures are aligned with international guidelines and standards, e.g.
ISO/IEC Guides 61 and 65 (the corresponding Russian standards (GOSTs)
are identical to these).[3]
|
Saudi Arabia,
Kingdom of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
Seychelles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
Nevertheless, reference is
made to the answer from Seychelles to question 3of the survey on
EMC/EMI, specifically to Annex 2, regarding the use of radio
communication equipment classified as a low powered/Short Range Device (SRD)
(G/IT/SPEC/Q4/29). Basically, as long as the low powered equipment/SRD meets
international standards such as European Telecommunications Standards
Institute (ETSI) and/or Federal Communications Commission (FCC) standards
which designate them as low powered equipment/SRD, then they will be accepted
for usage in the Seychelles. In line with the same, entities (or their
representatives) intending to place their equipment on the Seychelles' market
are required to submit the following documents: (1) a formal letter
requesting whether the equipment can be operated in Seychelles;
(2) technical brochure containing a general description of the equipment
and full technical specifications, including operating frequency, EIRP and
channel spacing of the equipment; and (3) Declaration or Certificate of
Conformity to Standards of the equipment by the manufacturer or accredited
independent test houses or laboratories having tested or type approved the
equipment in respect to: (i) Radio Frequency Spectrum;
(ii) Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC); and (iii) safety.
|
Singapore
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tests reports from
accredited testing laboratories for conformity assessment of EM Interference
for approval of telecommunication equipment.
|
Switzerland
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
1. For Information Technology equipment without radio part of
which cannot be connected to a public telecommunication network, the
manufacturer may choose one of the following conformity assessment
procedures:
(a) Internal
production control;
(b) Internal
production control with involvement of a third party (conformity assessment
body).
2. For Information Technology equipment that can be connected to
a public telecommunication network but without radio transmitter part, the
manufacturer may choose one of the following conformity assessment
procedures:
(a) Internal
production control;
(b) Technical
construction file procedure;
(c) Full quality
assurance procedure.
3. For Information Technology equipment containing a radio
transmitter part, following conformity assessment procedures are possible at
the choice of the manufacturer if they apply in full technical standards
designated by the Federal Office for Communications (OFCOM):
(a) Production
control plus specific apparatus tests;
(b) Technical
construction file procedure;
(c) Full quality
assurance procedure.
4. For these products, the manufacturer who does not apply or
apply only partly the technical standards designated by the Federal Office
for Communications (OFCOM):
(a) Technical
construction file procedure;
(b) Full quality
assurance procedure.[4]
|
Chinese Taipei
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
There were 30
items of IT products announced as
being applicable to the declaration of conformity (DoC) scheme,
and has increased to 41
items as of March 2015. Under
the DoC scheme, product testing should be
carried out by a designated testing laboratory recognized by the BSMI.
|
Tajikistan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available
|
Thailand
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
Turkey
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
However, if the supplier
chooses not to apply harmonized standards or there are no harmonized
standards, 3rd party opinion is sought.[5]
|
Ukraine
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
In some cases, the opinion
of a 3rd party needs to be sought, but only where a manufacturer
has not applied harmonized standards or these are not available. Supplier's
Declaration of Conformity (SDoC) type 4 – the supplier or manufacturer
of the equipment declares the equipment meets the technical and
administrative requirement. Registration of the equipment with the regulator
is not required and testing of the equipment by recognized testing laboratory
is not mandatory. If testing is undertaken, the choice of the testing
laboratory rests with supplier or manufacturer.
|
United Arab Emirates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
United States of America
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
Viet Nam
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available
|