|
Is there
a relevant international standard? If so, identify the standard:
[X] Codex
Alimentarius Commission (e.g. title or serial
number of Codex standard or related text):
-_
CAC/MRL 1
Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) for Pesticides 2009
-_
CAC/MRL 2
Maximum Residue Limits for Veterinary Drugs in Food 2009
-_
CAC/MRL 3
Extraneous Maximum Residue Limits (EMRLs) 2001 and subsequent variations to
relevant standards as adopted or revoked by the Commission
[ ] World Organization for Animal Health
(OIE) (e.g. Terrestrial or Aquatic Animal Health Code,
chapter number):
[ ] International Plant Protection
Convention (e.g. ISPM number):
[ ] None
Does this proposed regulation conform to the relevant international
standard?
[ ]
Yes [X] No
If no, describe, whenever possible, how and why it deviates from the
international standard: Certain
proposed limits may differ from Codex limits.
The
scientific methodology used by Australia to establish MRLs is consistent with
international best practice and follows a rigorous scientific risk analysis
including dietary exposure assessment to chemical residues from potentially
treated foods. Countries set MRLs according to the good agricultural practice
(GAP) or good veterinary practice (GVP) applicable to their region.
Agricultural and veterinary chemical use patterns differ between different
production regions and countries as pests, diseases and environmental factors
vary. This means that Australian MRLs for agricultural and veterinary
chemicals in food may differ from Codex standards.
Australia's
residues assessment processes for agricultural chemicals are available at: https://apvma.gov.au/node/1037.
Australia's
residues assessment processes for veterinary chemicals are available at: https://apvma.gov.au/node/719.
|