consultations with UKRAINE
Basic Document supplied by ukraine
OVERVIEW OF THE SITUATION AND OUTLOOK OF THE
BALANCE OF PAYMENTS TAKING INTO ACCOUNT INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL FACTORS THAT
AFFECT THE SITUATION
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1. This document has been prepared pursuant to para.11 of the
Understanding on the Balance‑of-Payments Provisions of the General Agreement on
Tariffs and Trade 1994. It contains:
a)
review of the balance-of-payments situation
and prospects, including a consideration of the internal and external factors
having a bearing on the balance-of-payments situation and the domestic policy
measures that are being taken in order to restore equilibrium on a sound and
lasting basis;
b)
a full description of the restrictions
applied for balance-of-payments purposes, their legal basis, and steps that are
being taken to reduce the resulting effects of the policy;
c)
a description of conditions for the
elimination or progressive relaxation of the remaining restrictions.
1.2. This document was prepared using statistical data and information
from the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU), the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine,
the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of Ukraine, the Ministry of
Agrarian Policy and Food of Ukraine, the Ministry of Energy and Coal Industry
of Ukraine, the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine, the State Statistics Service
of Ukraine (SSS), and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
2 OVERVIEW OF THE BALANCE OF PAYMENTS SITUATION AND OUTLOOK FOR
UKRAINE'S ECONOMY, INCLUDING INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL FACTORS HAVING A BEARING ON
THE BALANCE OF PAYMENTS SITUATION.
2.1 The Economic reasons for the introduction of measures
2.1.1 The economic situation in Ukraine
2.1. In 2010-11 in Ukraine there was a relative recovery from the global
financial crisis and its aftereffects on the real economy. This economic
recovery was driven by the influence of demand from foreign markets and the
increase of purchasing power domestically.
2.2. In terms of favorable impacts from internal and external short-term
events in 2011 through the first half of 2012, there was a significant increase
in the volume of investment led by one-time factors such as construction and
other preparations for the Euro 2012 (UEFA European Football Championship)
which was held in Ukraine.
2.3. During this period, apart from these temporary factors, the domestic
market was generally characterized by low liquidity of financial sector assets,
which in turn, created a lack of financial resources for lending and
investment.
2.4. Taking into account these complex factors in 2011, GDP growth in
Ukraine reached 5.5%. However, the pace of structural reform slowed down
preventing further economic growth.
2.5. In the period from 2012-14, Ukraine's economic growth continued to
fall due to the impact of internal and external factors that, up until the present,
contribute to the negative performance in almost all sectors of the economy. In
sum, during 2012-13, there was insignificant real GDP growth amounting to
only 0.2% annually, created mainly by an increase in domestic demand due to the
expansion of the consumer consumption (see Annex 1).
2.6. The deterioration of the economic situation in the country was the
result of unfavorable external conditions and their growing influence on the
internal imbalances in the economic system of the country. These factors include:
negative foreign exchange market fluctuations in the financial sector,
macroeconomic uncertainty, the downgrading of Ukraine's investment rating,
etc.).
2.7. Adverse external conditions, such as the fall in prices and a
reduction of global demand for major categories of Ukrainian export goods such
as metals, further negatively impacted external demand and economic growth.
These factors, and the end of the Euro 2012 investment surge, were exacerbated
by a general "cooling" in the investment sphere. In this period,
domestic consumer demand played a mitigating role in terms of compensating for
the negative trends in the investment sector and in negative fall in external
demand.
2.8. In 2014 the negative trends in the economy of the preceding years
intensified as a result of the economic and geopolitical impact of the
annexation of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, the deterioration of relations
with the Russian Federation, and the military conflict in eastern Ukraine.
2.9. By the end of 2014, the impact of the fall in domestic demand and in
Ukraine's export markets negatively impacted GDP. In 2014, the depth of the
decline of Ukraine's GDP accelerated the real GDP for 2014 decreased by 6.8% in
comparison with 2013 (see Annex 1).
2.10. Meanwhile, these events took place against a background of
restrictive social policies and the rapid growth of consumer prices in 2014
which further weakened household consumer spending along with the weakening of
production and foreign economic activity.
2.11. Due to the instability created by the military conflict in eastern
Ukraine and the annexation of Crimea, the macroeconomic instability and
imbalances in the financial sector of the economy, investors have mainly
considered Ukraine to be a high risk investment country.
2.12. To demonstrate this, in 2014, foreign investors invested US$2.45
billion in the Ukrainian economy. That is 56.8% less than the volume of
investments in 2013, 59.2% less than the volume of direct investment in 2012,
and 62.2% less than the volume of investment in 2011.
2.1.2 The consumer market situation in Ukraine
2.13. During 2011-13, Ukraine generally had low inflation. In 2011,
consumer prices increased by 4.6%. In 2012, they declined by 0.2%. In 2013,
they increased by 0.5%, respectively. This low inflationary environment can be
attributed to the stability of the currency market, the lack of pressure from
monetary factors, and the low rate of price increases on agricultural and
industrial products. In addition, the balanced policies used in the regulation
of prices for housing and communal services had a moderating impact on the
consumer price index (see Annex 2).
Data on savings and expenditures of households can be found in Annex 5.
2.14. In 2014, however, there was an acceleration of prices of up to
24.9 percent. The reasons for this increase include:
·
the annexation of Crimea, the intensification of the military conflict
in eastern Ukraine, and the resulting macroeconomic uncertainty contributed to
a decline in consumer confidence and negative expectations about growth a by
economic operators;
·
the devaluation of Ukraine's national currency, the Hryvnia (UAH),
against the U.S. Dollar. In 2014, the Hryvnia depreciated by 97.3% (see Annex 3). This
devaluation was subsequently reflected in terms of higher prices for various
product groups, where the share of imported products in Ukraine is high. For
example, prices for household consumer goods, household appliances, and the
costs of products for the daily maintenance of housing, increased by 27.9%; the
prices for pharmaceutical products, medical supplies, and medical equipment
increased by 44.9%; the cost of clothing and footwear increased by 14.5%;
·
consumer prices also increased due to the lag effects from the increase
in domestic prices in 2014 by 31.8%. The prices of manufactured food products,
beverages, and tobacco products increased by 27.3% and average selling prices
of agricultural enterprises increased by 33% in November 2014 compared to
December 2013. In 2014, prices for manufacturers also increased because of the
rising cost of transportation and other logistic as a part of production costs
by 60.7%;
·
administratively regulated fees for households and public utilities: in
general, prices for the group of fees on "Housing, water, electricity, gas
and other fuels" increased by up to 34.3% in 2014.
Table
1 Retail Turnover, 2013-14
|
2013
|
2014
|
Retail turnover, million Hryvnia
|
Growth rate, in %, to preceding year
|
Retail turnover, million Hryvnia
|
Growth rate, in %, to preceding year
|
Ukraine
|
884 204
|
109.5
|
903 535
|
91.4
|
including:
|
|
|
|
|
Donetsk region
|
89 713
|
108.5
|
65 745
|
63.0
|
Luhansk region
|
37 464
|
108.9
|
21 970
|
51.0
|
Autonomous Republic of Crimea
|
51 185
|
112.2
|
-
|
-
|
2.1.3 The devaluation of the Hryvnia (national currency)
2.15. In 2011-13 the fluctuation of the Hryvnia exchange rate in relation
to the U.S. Dollar on the interbank market was modest, falling within the range
of 7.93 - 8.15 Hryvnia/U.S. Dollar (see Annex 3).
In 2011-13 the NBU conducted interventions to influence the dynamics of the
Hryvnia exchange rate and to ensure payments to "Naftogaz" in U.S.
Dollar for imported gas. The NBU net foreign exchange intervention in 2011-13
was negative and amounted to 3.7, 7.5, and 3.1 billion (in U.S. Dollar
equivalent).
2.16. However, during this period, the macroeconomic imbalances existing
in the country deepened. They had been caused by soft demand and the focus in
fiscal policy on the current consumption. Real wages increased by 14% and 8% in
2012 and 2013, respectively. In addition, there was increase in government
energy subsidies for the population. Because of the gap between the prices of
imported gas and domestic prices, the deficit of the National Joint Stock
Company "Naftogaz" of Ukraine was almost 2% of GDP in 2013.
2.17. As a result, public debt exceeded 40% of GDP at the end of 2013. In
turn, Ukraine's foreign currency debt reached 65%, significantly increasing
currency risk.
2.18. In 2014, the accumulated macroeconomic and currency imbalances
sharpened due to social and political instability, the annexation of Crimea,
and hostilities in the east of Ukraine. The foreign currency earnings reduced
by 28.7% (compared to 2013). The rate of foreign currency earnings reduction
significantly increased from 2.5% in I quarter of 2014 to 53.9% in IV quarter.
2.19. As a result, Ukraine's deficit of non-cash foreign currency in 2014
amounted to almost US$10 billion equivalent (in 2013 the foreign currency
supply exceeded its demand by US$1.6 billion).
2.20. In the cash segment of the foreign exchange market, the foreign
currency demand exceeded supply by US$2.4 billion.
2.21. However, the diminishment of gold and foreign currency reserves did
not allow the National Bank of Ukraine to support the exchange rate of Hryvnia
through interventions at the level of the currency sales volumes of previous
years (see Annex 2).
2.22. Therefore, having been subject to negative economic pressures
stemming from the political and economic situation in the country, the
annexation of part of the territory, armed conflict, the Hryvnia depreciated
against the US Dollar on the interbank market by 93.5%.
2.23. Taking into account that the Hryvnia has greatly depreciated, demand
for foreign currency has increased, resulting in permanent stress conditions in
the operation of the currency market.
2.24. The NBU intervention on selling currency could interrupt the trend
of a downward spiral, which can be self-reinforcing. However, because of the
very limited amount of international reserves (as of 1 March 2015,
international reserves fell to US$5.6 billion) as well as awareness of these
limited reserves by market participants, intervention actions will not achieve
satisfactory results and do not seem to be possible.
2.25. Taking into account the above mentioned factors it is appropriate to
take emergency measures in order to limit the foreign currency demand, in
particular, to temporarily reduce imports.
2.1.4 Ukraine's Energy Sector
2.26. Ukraine's economy is one of the most energy intensive economies in
the world with limited domestic energy resources. Data on production, import
and export can be found in Annex 6.
2.27. In particular, the Ukrainian economy depends on natural gas. The
natural gas production in Ukraine is insufficient to meet its own needs.
2.28. At the beginning of 2014 in Ukraine, there was an absolutely
unfavorable situation with regard to natural gas consumers. At the beginning of
the year, "Gazprom" raised prices and from June stopped all gas
supplies. In this difficult situation, the Government of Ukraine had to
compensate for the lack of gas by importing from Europe.
2.29. In 2014, Ukraine managed to begin to diversify its gas supply,
increasing its supply of gas from EU sources by 4.0 billion cubic meters from
January to November 2014 were re-imported from Poland, Slovakia, Hungary. Over
the same period last year, Ukraine imported 2.1 billion cubic meters from
Europe, compared with the period two years ago - 0.1 billion cubic meters.
2.30. The significant resource potential of Ukraine was lost due to
annexation of Crimea. A significant part of Ukrainian oil and gas fields
are located in the Black Sea basin. During recent years Ukraine has invested
the largest amount of funds in gas producing industry in Crimea, in particular
investment in the state-owned enterprise "Chernomorneftegaz", which
has been collected by Russia. Russian occupation of Crimea has brought real and
potential losses to Ukrainian fuel and energy complex amounting to US$300
billion.
2.31. The escalation of hostilities in eastern Ukraine has caused extreme
damage to the Ukrainian coal industry. According to approximate estimates in
eastern Ukraine today only 24 of 95 state‑owned mines work at a normal
capacity, 57 mines operate in a mode in which only a minimum of staff is
employed. In addition, 14 mines were completely destroyed. Some of these mines
had produced over one million tons of coal per year.
2.32. The importance of coal for Ukraine is essential. It is used in
thermal power plants to generate electricity for household needs and industry.
It is a source of regional employment. In addition, coal-derived energy is used
for the needs of agriculture, the production of construction materials, etc.
2.33. Because of this radical decline in the normal production capacity of
Ukrainian mines, at the beginning of 2015, the coal deficit in Ukraine grew to
approximately three million tons. This has a negative impact on electricity
generation, which in turn, has led to periodic electricity cut-offs for most
regions of the country.
2.34. The factors detailed above explain how the territorial issues have
exacerbated the economic crisis in the country. Further, it has had broader
effects including a decrease in business activity across the board, a further
decline in consumer confidence, and a severe deterioration of the financial
condition of enterprises and households.
2.35. Direct losses from the occupation of the territories of Ukraine,
located in the zone of military conflict in the Lugansk and Donetsk regions, as
well as the territories of Crimea, are as follows:
Table
2 Direct losses from the occupation of the territories of Ukraine
|
Total
|
Donetsk region
|
Luhansk region
|
AR Crimea
|
Sevastopol
|
Population
|
13.5%
|
2269600
(52.2% of population in the region)
|
1514800
(67.6%)
|
1966600
|
386200
|
Industrial products
|
17.5%
|
111.1 bln Hryvnia
(54% of total volume in the region)
|
56.3 bln Hryvnia
(83.1%)
|
22.7 bln Hryvnia
|
4.1 bln Hryvnia
|
Agricultural products
|
4.8%
|
3540 mln Hryvnia
(30.8% of total volume in the region)
|
1770 mln Hryvnia
(27.2%)
|
6592.8 mln Hryvnia
|
156,8 mln Hryvnia
|
Construction work
|
16.6%
|
5819.9 mln. Hryvnia
|
1325.7 mln Hryvnia
|
2143.9 mln Hryvnia
|
458.3 mln Hryvnia
|
Export of goods
|
16.7%
|
US$6585.4 mln
|
US$2976.1 mln
|
US$914.9 mln
|
US$99.8 mln
|
Import of goods
|
6.6%
|
US$3056.4 mln
|
US$831.5 mln
|
US$1044.5 mln
|
US$107 mln
|
Export of services
|
7.7%
|
US$489.6 mln
|
US$132 mln
|
US$521.7 mln
|
US$81.3 mln
|
Import of services
|
9.5%
|
US$532.6 mln
|
US$113.4 mln
|
US$75.9 mln
|
US$10 mln
|
Retail turnover of
enterprises
|
15.1%
|
28.9 bln Hryvnia
|
12.3 bln Hryvnia
|
24 bln Hryvnia
|
Road freight
transportation tons-km
|
9.9%
|
2141.7 mln t/km
|
635.3 mln t/km
|
597.9 mln t/km
|
Road passenger
transportation
|
17.1%
|
3971.6 mln t/km
|
1502.2 mln t/km
|
597.9 mln t/km
|
2.36. Direct losses to the State budget total UAH 9.29 billion in 2014.
The military conflict in the east of Ukraine, in addition to the toll on human
lives, has led to the destruction and damage of: housing; industrial
facilities; road and transport infrastructure; the energy, gas, water supply
network, and waste water treatment facilities, public health services
facilities, retail establishments, and other facilities.
2.37. According to the preliminary estimates of local authorities and
local governments, as of 30.01.2015, in Donetsk and Lugansk 11.1 thousand
different forms of property were damaged due to the military conflict totalling
more than UAH 4.3 billion. This includes: 8292 houses valued at to UAH 681.9
million, 438 education, health, physical education and sport facilities valued
at UAH 458.2 million, 1461 critical infrastructure objects, including
power supply lines and stations valued at UAH 880,5 million, 454 segments of
the road transportation infrastructure valued at more than UAH 2 billion. At
present, it is not possible to make a final assessment of the estimated value
of destroyed industrial facilities, schools, banking institutions, etc.
2.38. Industrial production was affected the most by the destabilization
of the situation in eastern Ukraine. In 2014, industrial production decreased
by 10.1% (in 2013 - by 4.3%). In the Donetsk region industrial production it
decreased 31.5% and the Lugansk region it decreased by 42%.
2.39. Since January 2014, industrial production in Ukraine declined by
21.3% overall. Further since January 2015, the industrial crisis in the
industry intensified and industrial production fell by 4.2% in that period
alone. In Donetsk and Lugansk regions, industrial production fell by 49.9%, and
by 87%, respectively.
2.40. The mining industry was affected the most by the military conflict:
in 2014, mining production declined by 13.7%. Most severely, coal mining
volumes for the year decreased by 30.5%. The deficit of local raw materials was
one of the factors inhibiting the development of metallurgy, the manufacture of
coke, the refinement of petroleum products, the supply of electricity and gas.
2.41. The decrease in production of the sectors above accelerated towards
the end of 2014. The only positive results at the end of 2014 were from
operations in the food processing industry and in the production of beverages
and tobacco (an increase of 2.5%) and in the manufacture of basic
pharmaceutical products and pharmaceutical preparations (an increase of 1.9%).
2.42. The agriculture sector has been slightly less affected. Favorable
weather conditions in 2014 led to a record harvest (since the official
statistics began). In 2014, there was a record yield of 63.8 million tons vs.
62.3 million tons in 2013. As a consequence, agriculture in 2014, as it had in
2011-13, remained the main economic driver delivering very positive results.
The volume of agricultural production in 2014 increased by 2.8% (whereas the
average growth for the period of 2011-13 was 10%).
2.43. However, taking into account that a number of agricultural
enterprises in the Donetsk and Lugansk regions were closed, as well as the
increased costs from decreased industrial activity and reduced consumer demand,
the volume of agricultural production in January 2015 compared to January 2014
fell by 2.4%. In Donetsk region, the decrease of agricultural production was
26% and in Lugansk region it fell by 54.1%.
3 ANALYSIS OF BALANCE OF PAYMENTS SITUATION
3.1. On the basis of these developments in 2014, the balance of payments
was under considerable pressure – the balance of payments deficit amounted to US$13.3
billion. This was nearly the level experienced during the year 2009, which had
been a crisis year for the Ukrainian economy. Deficit financing was done
through the use of reserve assets which resulted in the reduction of
international reserves to US$7.5 billion or 1.4 months of future imports. This
downward trend continued in 2015: as of 01.03.2015, the reserves decreased to US$5.6 billion
(see Annex 7).
Chart 1 Current and financial accounts Chart 2 International Reserves
(US$
billion)
Source: NBU. Source: NBU.
3.2. In recent years, the current account deficit greatly exceeded the critical
permissible limit (4‑5% of GDP), which caused the accumulation of large
external sector imbalances.
Chart 3 Current
account balance Chart Chart 4 Current
account balance
(US$ billion)
Source: NBU. Source: NBU.
3.1 Current account
3.3. The sharp decline in the deficit of the current account to 4.1% of
GDP in 2014 was due to the reduction of the imports of goods and services by 27% (see Annex 8). The decline in imports occurred in all product groups due to
substantial reduction of domestic consumer and investment demand and the
Hryvnia devaluation. Although the rate of decline in imports in 2014 was much
higher than the rate of decline of exports, the trade balance still remained
negative. The supply of goods can mostly be attributed to the reduction of
imports from the Russian Federation (overall, by 45.5%), and in particular, due
to lower imports of gas (by 63.1%). Imports share from the Russian Federation
decreased to 20.6% (from 27.4% in 2013), while the imports share from the EU
increased to 32.4% (from 30.2% in 2013) (see
Annex 9).
Chart 5 Trade Balance and REER Chart
6 Import structure by regions
(%)
Source: NBU. Source: SSS.
3.4. The biggest imports share of goods
is in the category of mineral products, specifically
mineral fuels. However, the gradual reduction of the intensive use of energy in
the Ukrainian economy cause these imports to decline from 32.4 % in 2010 to
24.5% in 2014. The contraction of domestic investment demand in 2013-14
resulted, for the period of 2012-14, in a decrease of machinery products
imports by two times. Specifically, their share of imports decreased from 25%
in 2012 to 19.5% in 2014. Due to the decline in consumer demand, imports of agricultural
goods, industrial products, and cars in 2014 declined by 26.2%, 28.6% and 2.5
times, respectively (see Annex 10).
Chart
7 Import structure Chart
8 Merchandise imports change in 2014
(%) (US$
billion)
Source: NBU. Source: NBU.
3.5. The positive effect on Ukraine's current account of the reduction of
imports in 2014 was largely negated by the decline in exports of goods and
services of 19.5%. This decline was due to non-economic factors: trade barriers
imposed by the Russian Federation, the decline in production, and therefore,
export capacity due to the military conflict in the Eastern Ukraine, and the
trade effects of the temporary occupation of Crimea. An additional factor was
the decline in the export of major products in world markets, in particular, in
metals and ores and a simultaneous decline in global prices for these goods.
Thus, despite the devaluation of the Hryvnia, Ukrainian exporters did not see a
net gain from any competitive advantage that the devalued currency could have
created.
3.6. In 2014 there were changes in the structure of exports of goods in
terms of the commodities traded as well as the geographic destination of those
goods. Due to trade liberalization with the EU, Ukraine's volume of exports to
the EU countries increased by 2.1%. The EU's share of Ukraine's total global
exports of goods increased to 30.6%. That is compared with 25.8% in 2013 and
24% on average for the period of 2008-13. However, trade restrictions imposed
by the Russian Federation caused the decrease of exports to Russia by 34.8%,
and Russia's overall share of Ukraine's total global exports fell to 17.7% as
compared to 23.2% in 2013 (see Annex 11).
Chart 9 Export of ferrous metals and grains Chart 10 Export structure by regions
(%)
Source: SSS.
3.7. The category of goods that saw the lowest reduction in exports was
agricultural goods (2%). Ukrainian exports to EU countries of these products
increased by 6.4%. Thus, the share of food products exports in 2014 exceeded
the share of the other major export group, ferrous metals. The steady increase
in the share of agricultural exports was due to the increase of the supply of
cereals owing to a record harvest during the preceding years. The largest
decrease occurred in machinery exports, especially rail transport equipment
which was traditionally exported to the Russian Federation and now are
banned by the RF. There was also a reduction in the exports of steel products.
As described earlier, the steel industry is located in the area of the military
conflict and suffered a significant reduction in output (see
Annex 12).
Chart 11 Export
structure Chart
12 Merchandise exports change in 2014
(%) (US$
billion)
Source: NBU. Source: NBU.
3.8. In 2014, there also was a sharp
reduction in Ukraine’s trade balance surplus for services due to a decrease of income from tourism. The number of visitors to
Ukraine rapidly declined by two times, especially visitors from the
Russian Federation. Ukraine also saw a 28% loss in revenues from transportation
as a result of the destruction of infrastructure in the eastern part of the
country, the decrease in overall economic activity, and the decrease in the gas
transit (see Annex 8).
Chart
13 Balance of services Chart
14 Services
(US$ billion) (US$
billion)
Source: NBU.
3.9. In 2014, Ukraine's surplus in the
category of "transfers" also decreased due to the reduction of remittances
to Ukraine by 23.2%, which was primarily a reduction of remittances from the
Russian Federation. However, the negative balance in the category of
"income" decreased due to reduced dividend payments from foreign
direct investments (by 69.1%) which was connected to the economic recession and
the Hryvnia devaluation.
Chart 15 Remittances in Ukraine Chart
16 Repayments of investment income
(US$
billion)
(US$
billion)
Source: NBU.
3.2 Financial and capital account
3.10. In 2014 there was a reversal of
capital flows in the financial account. Opportunities for attracting foreign capital are severely
constrained by the instability created by the military conflict. Therefore, in 2014,
for the first time during the last five years, Ukraine experienced a deficit in
its capital and financial account of US$8.1 billion (see
Annex 8). Due to the deteriorating
investment climate, net public sector loans and bonds totalling US$3.2 billion
did not cover the outflow of private sector funds which was –US$5.2 billion).
The rollover of private sector external liabilities fell to 86 %, primarily due
to the low rollover of the real sector (64%), which decreased for the first
time more than 100% since the crisis of 2009.
3.11. The public sector has attracted
loans and macro-financial assistance from the EU (EUR 1.6 billion),
the World Bank (US$1.3 billion), Canada (US$0.2 billion US Dollars), and Japan
(US$0.1 billion) and has issued Eurobonds under a Government guarantee for US$1
billion.
Chart 17 Financial and capital account Chart 18 Rollover on external
liabilities of the private sector
(US$ billion) (%)
Source: NBU. Source: NBU.
3.12. Net FDI inflows were the lowest
since 2006 (US$0.4 billion). In addition, in 2014,
Ukraine had to make significant debt repayment of trade credits of US$3.6
billion during 9 months and a US$3.1 billion repayment of Ukrainian
National Joint Stock Company "Naftogaz" in the fourth quarter.
3.13. The growth in the trend of maintaining
currency outside of banks continued (reaching US$2.6 bln)
due to high expectations about further devaluation of the Hryvnia. Policy support for the fixed exchange
rate of the Hryvnia in 2010-13 and at the beginning of 2014 caused the
accumulation of large imbalances that resulted into increased demand for
foreign currency.
Chart 19 Foreign direct investment Chart 20 Foreign cash
holdings outside banks
(US$ billion) (US$
billion)
Source: NBU. Source: NBU.
3.3 External debt
3.14. According to the NBU the external debt as of the end of 2014
amounted to US$126,3 billion, having decreased by US$15,8 billion since the
beginning of 2014. Financial and corporate sectors reduced their external
liabilities by US$19,1billion, but public debt grew by US$3,4 billion as a
result of borrowings from the international financial institutions (see Annex 13).
Chart 21 Gross external debt (eop)
(US$
billion)
Source: NBU.
3.4 Balance of payments forecast for 2015
3.15. In 2015, Ukraine expects to
further reduce its current account deficit to 1-2 % of GDP. This is due to reduced imports caused by the decline in domestic
demand and currency devaluation. However, despite the positive impact of
increased price competitiveness of Ukrainian goods, exports continue to decline
due to a number of such factors:
·
the military conflict in the eastern part of the country and restrictive
trade measures applied by the Russian Federation;
·
current downward trend in world prices for metals and ores;
·
Ukraine's continuing high dependence on imported raw materials; and
·
increasing competition in foreign markets.
3.16. In 2015, the repayment of
financial account surplus is forecasted, despite the
low rollover on external liabilities of the private sector, which is expected
to be at 2014. Net FDI is forecasted to increase to 1.2% of GDP. In addition,
further outflows of currency outside of banks are not expected and repayment of
trade credits. In addition, the IMF's (Extended Fund Facility) is expected to
attract official financing from many other international organizations and
countries.
Chart
22 Current account balance Chart
23 Capital and financial account
(US$ billion) (US$
billion)
Source: NBU. Source: NBU.
3.17. However, the potential outflow of
foreign currency to cover debt remains high. Thus,
Ukraine expects to only make scheduled payments in foreign currency on foreign
debt to non‑residents in 2015 as follows: US$8.2 billion for the banking sector
and US$14.0 billion for the corporate sector, excluding US$8.3 billion for the
public sector.
4 DOMESTIC POLICY MEASURES TAKEN IN ORDER TO RESTORE EQUILIBRIUM ON A
SOUND AND LASTING BASIS
4.1 Public finances improvement
4.1. The main parameters of the State Budget of Ukraine for 2015 include:
·
State revenues amounting to 502.3 billion Hryvnia, including revenues of
the State Budget of Ukraine of 474.8 billion Hryvnia and revenues of the
special fund of the State Budget of Ukraine of 27.5 billion Hryvnia;
·
Government expenditures amounting to 566.9 billion Hryvnia, including
expenditures of the State Budget of Ukraine of 537.7 billion Hryvnia and
expenditures of the special fund of the State Budget of Ukraine of 29.3 billion
Hryvnia;
·
The amount of loan repayments to the state budget amounting to 4,8
billion Hryvnia and the amount of loans from the state budget amounting to 16.0
billion Hryvnia;
·
Limiting the amount of government deficits amounting to 75.8 billion
Government debt limit of 1394.4 billion Hryvnia. The volume of loans totalling
397.4 billion Hryvnia, repayment of 251.6 billion Hryvnia. The costs of
servicing public debt is 92.7 billion Hryvnia.
4.2. In order to improve its public finances, Ukraine is taking steps to
increase revenues and reduce expenditures of the State Budget.
4.3. Amendments of the State Budget of Ukraine were based on revised
macroeconomic indicators, in particular:
·
the exchange rate of the national currency;
·
the National Bank of Ukraine's discount rate of 30%;
·
the results of negotiations with the IMF on the adoption of a new
cooperation program (increase in tariffs for natural gas, hot water and heating).
4.4. Based on the factors above, forecasted increases in revenues of the
State budget are based on: VAT; the rental fee and the fee for the other
natural resources use; the transportation rent; charges for fuel and energy
resources; import duty; and the corporate profit tax. Cost reductions are being
made in the State budget in terms of a reduction of spending on education
subsidies, grants for training labor, medical grants, and transfers to the
Pension Fund.
4.2 Structural reforms
4.5. Tax reform. To
improve the business environment, Ukraine took measures to reduce corporate
costs for tax accounting and government spending on tax administration. It
reduced the tax burden, in particular, the number of taxes were reduced from 22
to 11. It conducted fiscal decentralization (increasing the financial capacity
of local budgets), improved the principles for the control of transfer pricing.
4.6. Creating a favorable business climate. To move towards deregulation and create a favorable business
climate, the Government of Ukraine identified the following immediate
priorities:
·
trade and export promotion,
·
deregulation and improvement
of the business environment,
·
attracting investment,
·
reducing the role of
regulatory and supervisory authorities, and
·
waging a systematic fight
against corruption.
4.7. Reform of the energy sector. The Government of Ukraine is taking measures to ensure the
transition to a more energy-efficient economy, including energy-savings and the
reduction of energy consumption with the introduction of innovative technologies
that will reduce the energy intensity of its GDP. It is implementing Government
policies aimed at ensuring Ukraine's energy independence, the diversification
of its energy supply, the introduction of market rates in energy sector, and
the reform of subsidies in this area.
4.8. The reform of public enterprises and
privatization of state property. In order to reform the public sector of the
economy and to make it more effective, the Government is conducting a
large-scale and transparent privatization of state property, it is conducting
an international audit of public companies, and it is implementing programs to
ensure the effectiveness of strategic state property.
4.9. Strengthening macroeconomic financial
stability. The
Government is strengthening macroeconomic financial stability by: (1) restoring price stability; and (2) improving the financial
condition of the banking system through recapitalization, the reduction of
loans to related parties, and the reduction of problem assets. These measures
will provide a stable macroeconomic environment and credit support from the
banking system, which are preconditions for the competitiveness of Ukrainian
business in the world.
5 DESCRIPTION OF THE RESTRICTIONS APPLIED FOR BALANCE OF PAYMENTS
PURPOSES, THEIR LEGAL BASIS, AND STEPS TO REDUCE INCIDENTAL PROTECTIVE EFFECTS
5.1. The accumulation of a number of macroeconomic imbalances, problems
attracting private sector external financing, and limitations on export growth
due to instability stemming from the military conflict have significantly
influenced Ukraine’s balance of payments.
5.2. In connection with the balance of payments problem, the Verkhovna
Rada of Ukraine has adopted the Law of Ukraine "On measures concerning
stabilization of the balance of payments of Ukraine in compliance with Article
XII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994" (hereinafter - the
Law of Ukraine).
5.3. On 25 February 2015, this law came into force (according to the
Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine as of 16.02.2015 № 119-r).
5.4. This law was developed in accordance with the provisions of Article
XII GATT 1994 and the Understanding on Balance-of-Payments Provisions of the
GATT 1994.
5.5. This law aims at setting temporarily, for a period of 12 months, an
import surcharge on goods imported into the customs territory of Ukraine under
the customs regime of import, regardless of the country of origin of such goods
or free trade agreements (treaties) signed by Ukraine.
5.6. The goods subject to import surcharge are those imported into the
customs territory of Ukraine, the customs value of which exceeds the equivalent
of EUR 150.
5.7. The base on which the import surcharge will be assessed is the
customs value of goods imported into the customs territory of Ukraine.
5.8. The import charge is levied at the following rates:
·
10% for goods classified in Chapters 1-24 (HS2012);
·
5% for goods classified in Chapters 25-97 (HS2012);
·
10% for all goods imported (brought) by persons into the customs
territory of Ukraine.
5.9. The import surcharge is not imposed on
essential goods that are imported to the customs territory of
Ukraine, in particular:
·
oil classified in subheading 2709 00 9000 (HS2012);
·
natural gas classified in subheadings 2711 11 0000 and 2711 21 0000
(HS2012);
·
non-irradiated fuel elements (FE), classified in subheading 8401 30 0000
(HS2012);
·
electrical energy, classified in subheading 2716 00 00 00 (HS2012);
·
coal classified in subheadings 2701 110000, 2701 121000, 2701 129000,
2701 190000, 2704 001900, 2704 003000, 2708 200000, 2713 110000, 2713 120000
(HS2012);
·
gasoline, mazout (residual fuel oil), and diesel fuel classified in
subheading 2710 (HS2012), except subheadings 2710 91 00 00 and 2710 99 00 00;
·
medical devices for hemodialysis and treatment of cancer patients
(according to the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine as of
16.02.2015 No.63), pharmaceutical products and compounds for their production,
that are not produced in Ukraine, classified in Chapters 28, 29, (HS2012) (according
to the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine as of 17 November 2004
р. No.1568);
·
goods donated free of charge to Ukraine by other governments or
international organizations and goods imported into the customs territory of
Ukraine within the framework of international technical assistance under
international (intergovernmental) agreements ratified by the Verkhovna Rada of
Ukraine;
·
goods that are imported into the customs territory of Ukraine within the
framework of international technical assistance projects such as: the G8
initiative "Global Partnership Against the Spread of Weapons and Materials
of Mass Destruction"; the decommissioning of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power
Plant and the transformation of the "Shelter" into an ecologically
safe system;
·
humanitarian or charity assistance and goods imported by the Red Cross
Society of Ukraine;
·
goods paid for by grants provided under the Global Fund to Fight AIDS,
Tuberculosis and Malaria in Ukraine;
5.10. A detailed list of goods by HS code is supplied in Annex 14.[1]
5.1 Justification for the import surcharge imposition and the period of
its application
5.11. The key aim of introducing an import surcharge is the improvement of
balance of payments. The surcharge was applied to improve the state of
international reserves of the National Bank of Ukraine and to help forestall a
further serious reduction in monetary reserves.
5.12. The theory of supply and demand was used as the basis for
calculating e the rate of the import surcharges and the duration of their
validity.
5.13. The implementation of the import surcharge will reduce the overall
rate of imports, affecting the balance of payments. It will also create a
redistributive effect, i.e., with the increasing cost of imported goods,
consumer demand will be reoriented to domestically-produced goods. In turn, the
increased demand for domestic products, will affect the growth of domestic
production in related industries. Though, it was also considered that the
effective stimulation of domestic production is only possible with import
surcharge imposed for a period from 6 months to one year.
5.14. Calculations show that the introduction of import surcharge for the
period specified will not cause a significant increase in domestic prices and
will not negatively impact a domestic demand, which, in turn, will provide an
opportunity to intensify domestic production, increase GDP and improve the
balance of payments.
5.2 Estimated effect from an import surcharge and the impact of measures
on domestic producers
5.15. The estimated effects from an import surcharge were based on the
following information:
·
increase in the value of imports of agricultural products for HS
Chapters 1-24 to 10%;
·
increase in the value of imports of industrial goods for HS Chapters
25-97 to 5%;
·
data provided by the State Statistics Service of Ukraine on the volume
of imports to Ukraine in 2014 of goods, except for essential goods such as
coal, oil, petroleum products (gasoline, diesel), natural gas, non-irradiated
fuel elements (cartridges ), and electricity; and
·
forecasts of total imports of goods in 2015.
5.16. During the calculations, it was also assumed that by introducing of
temporary import surcharge, imports will partly decrease due to the increase in
the cost of goods and the reorientation of consumer demand for cheaper
products, particularly for domestically-produced goods. The structure of
imports was also a factor in determining the level of rates of the import
surcharge. The results of the calculations predicted that the decrease in
imports of goods from the introduction of import surcharge will be
approximately US$1.25 billion, specifically, a US$0.25 billion reduction
in imports of agricultural products and a US$1 billion reduction in imports of
industrial products. Accordingly, an increase in GDP as a whole is estimated at
about 1 percentage point.
5.17. Thus, introducing of temporary import surcharge for all imported
goods (other than certain essential goods) will have additional positive impact
on the economic growth of Ukraine, namely an increase in demand for domestic
products through the reorientation of consumer demand, leading to an increase
in domestic production.
5.18. It should be noted that imported agricultural products and
industrial products have different conditions in the domestic market. Thus,
domestic agricultural production now fully satisfies domestic needs and the
supply is increasingly used for export. The share of imported products that are
used as inputs into further production of other products is 8% overall, and is
13.2% in the case of manufacturers of food, beverages and tobacco products.
Introduction of an additional import surcharge may have some restrictive effect
on the confectionery industry, brewing industry and the tobacco manufacturers,
but will have a positive effect and stimulate the production of meat and dairy
products.
5.19. In industrial production as a whole, the share of imported products
that are used as inputs into the production of other goods is quite significant, 41.5% overall. For the
production of chemicals and chemical products, the share is 75%, for the
production of textiles, clothing, leather, leather goods and other materials
the share is 63%, for the production of coke and refined petroleum products the
share is 56% (petroleum products), for the manufacture of electrical equipment
the share is 51%, for the manufacture of rubber and plastic products and other
non‑metallic mineral products the share is 35%.
5.3 Legal framework and the steps taken for reduce adverse affect of
implementing the import surcharge
5.20. The import surcharge was introduced by the Law of Ukraine "On
measures concerning stabilization of the balance of payments of Ukraine in
compliance with Article XII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
1994" of 28 December 2014 No.73-VIII and the Law of Ukraine "On
Amending the Customs Code of Ukraine (concerning stabilization of the balance
of payments)" of 28 December 2014 No.74-VIII.
5.21. The legal basis for the introduction of the import surcharge is
Article XII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (hereinafter -
the GATT 1994) and the Understanding on the Balance of Payments Provisions of
the GATT 1994, (hereafter – "the Understanding").
5.22. Pursuant to paragraph 9 of the Understanding, in WTO document
WT/BOP/N/78 of 21.01.2015, Ukraine notified measures in connection with the
balance of payments and its readiness for starting consultations with the Committee
on Balance-of-Payments Restrictions in accordance with Article XII of GATT 1994.
5.23. Part one of Article XII of GATT 1994 is an exception to the general
provisions of the GATT 1994 and provides for the right of the Member to
safeguard its external financial position and its balance of payments by
restricting the quantity or value of imported goods. Pursuant to that, it
should be noted that the Law "On measures concerning stabilization of the
balance of payments of Ukraine in compliance with Article XII of the General
Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994" provides for the temporarily
introduction of price measure in the form of import surcharge at rates that are
not prohibitive .
5.24. Article XII:2(a) of GATT 1994 established that import restrictions
instituted, maintained or intensified by a Member shall not exceed those
necessary:
·
to forestall the imminent threat of, or to stop, a serious decline in
its monetary reserves;
·
in the case of a party with very low monetary reserves, to achieve a
reasonable rate of increase in its reserves.
5.25. Ukraine has taken the decision to introduce the import surcharge
based on data from the National Bank of Ukraine and the Ministry of Finance of
Ukraine, which describe the increasingly negative trends in the foreign
exchange market and the financial sector, macroeconomic uncertainty, the
reduction of Ukraine's investment rating, and the deteriorating economic
situation in the country as a whole.
5.26. Such measures were applied to improve the state of international
reserves of the National Bank of Ukraine and to help forestall a further
serious reduction in monetary reserves, as well to restore the balance of
payments.
5.27. At the same time, the measures imposed by Ukraine do not exceed the
level necessary to achieve these goals. That is, the introduction of 10% import
surcharge for agricultural products and foodstuffs and 5% import surcharge on
industrial goods, will have no direct impact on the price increase.
5.28. Thus, as provided in paragraph 4 of the Understanding, Ukraine's
introduction of a surcharge in relation to its balance of payments recognizes
that the surcharge applies only to regulate the total level of imports and will
not exceed the extent that is necessary to resolve the balance of payments
situation.
5.29. It should be noted that that the introduction of the import
surcharge is only one of the of the internal policy measures being taken by
Ukraine to restore its balance of payments on a sound and lasting basis.
5.30. While the introduction of the import surcharge is essential to
restore the balance of payments of the Government, Ukraine is taking additional
measures to achieve this goal. In this context, Ukraine has undertaken the
following additional initiatives such as:
·
encouraging and increasing production,
·
promoting export and investments into productive activities,
·
strengthening macroeconomic financial stability by improving the
financial condition of the banking system,
·
changing legislation to minimize the risk of the financial system of the
country and eliminating unfair business practices by monetary market
participants,
·
increasing the capitalization of banks,
·
protecting the interests of depositors and creditors of banks, and
·
establishing effective risk management mechanisms.
5.31. At the same time, the Government is monitoring closely special
factors that may affect the reserves of Ukraine, such as the use of special
external loans and other resources.
5.32. Subject to the provisions of Article XII:3(b) of GATT 1994 and
paragraph 4 of the Understanding, the Law of Ukraine "On measures
concerning stabilization of the balance of payments of Ukraine in compliance
with Article XII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994,"
Article 5 contains a list of essential goods that are exempt from the import
surcharge. The list of such goods is provided in Annex 14.[2]
5.33. In view of the provisions of Article XII:2(b) GATT 1994, the
introduction of import surcharge is provided temporarily for a period of 12
months.
5.34. Thus, it should be emphasized that the measure is temporary with the
possibility of gradual liberalization provided to improve the balance of
payments situation.
5.35. The Understanding does not set requirements for the level of import
surcharge rates. As previously mentioned, in determining the specific import
surcharge rates and the duration of their validity the theory of supply and
demand was used as a basis for calculations. The different domestic conditions
for imported agricultural and industrial products were also considered.
5.36. Summing up, the introduction of an additional import surcharge as a
way to restore the balance of payments is conducted in accordance with the
provisions of Article XII of GATT 1994 and the Understanding.
6 CONDITIONS FOR THE RELAXATION AND TERMINATION OF THE MEASURE
6.1. The accumulation of a number of macroeconomic imbalances, problems
with attracting of external financial resources by private sector, and limited
export prospects due to instability created by the military conflict, significantly
influenced Ukraine's balance of payments. The introduction of import surcharge
will reduce non-energy imports and thus, will help lead to an equilibration of
the balance of payments.
6.2. Provided that the effect of the import surcharge will be seen in the
second quarter 2015, it is expected to reduce imports by about US$250-300
million in a quarter of a year. It is estimated that in 2015, the effect from
the introduced import surcharge may be US$0.8 billion. In addition, the
increased supply by domestic manufacturers will increase in GDP by 1%.
Chart
24 Import of goods forecast Chart
25 Trade balance
(US$ billion) (US$
billion)
Source: NBU
estimations. Source: NBU estimations.
6.3. Based on the factors above, it is important to emphasize that the
import surcharge is a price‑based temporary measure for a period of 12 months,
set at a non-prohibitive rates. If the situation with the balance of payments
is improved by the end of 2015, and the equilibrium of the balance of payments
is restored to at least the level of 2013, Ukraine does not exclude the
possibility of removing the surcharge before end of the 12 month period.
_______________