Statement by the International Grains Council
111th meeting of the WTO Committee on
Agriculture
24-25 March 2025
Submission
by the International Grains Council (IGC)
The
following submission, dated 20 March 2025, is being circulated at the request
of the International Grains Council (IGC).
_______________
1 NEW FORECASTS FOR 2025/26
1.1. The first full set of projections for 2025/26 total grains
point to an overall increase in output, led by maize, but with advances too,
for wheat and barley. With production gains (+3%) only partly countered by a
low level of opening stocks, a 1% increase in total supply is anticipated.
Despite a rise in consumption, with most of the growth for feed and industrial
use, carryover inventories are projected to edge higher, buoyed by an
accumulation in the major exporters. Trade is expected to rebound, with the 2%
y/y upturn but remaining well below earlier peaks.
1.2. In the Council's first formal soybean
outlook for 2025/26, a record outturn (+2%) is anticipated but tied by marginal
area gains. Further gains in total use (+4%) and inventories are likely. With
Brazilian suppliers predicted to account for two-thirds of world shipment
flows, trade is projected to rise by 2% to a fresh high.
1.3. Following on from a year of record production and consumption, gains
on acreage and trend yields, rice
global output is predicted to expand to a high in 2025/26. Growing populations
in key consuming regions are set to underpin expanded total use, while firmer
demand from buyers in Asia and Africa could see trade increase to a record of
59 million tonnes in 2026. India is set to remain the dominant exporter. A
modest uplift in inventories is anticipated, chiefly on accumulation in China.
1.4. After declining in the prior year, global dry peas
production could increase in 2025/26 on a rebound in Russian output, with
uptake also set to recover. Following an anticipated marked contraction in 2025
on softer demand from South Asia, trade is predicted to hold steady in the next
calendar year.
WORLD
ESTIMATES
|
22/23
|
23/24
|
24/25
|
25/26
|
|
|
est.
|
f'cast
|
proj.
|
million tonnes
|
|
|
20.02
|
20.03
|
20.03
|
TOTAL
GRAINS a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
2,269
|
2,310
|
2,301
|
2,306
|
2,368
|
Trade
|
429
|
459
|
419
|
416
|
424
|
Consumption
|
2,273
|
2,323
|
2,334
|
2,336
|
2,367
|
Carryover stocks
|
620
|
607
|
576
|
577
|
578
|
year/year change
|
-4
|
-13
|
|
-30
|
1
|
Major exporters b)
|
144
|
140
|
129
|
132
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WHEAT
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
803
|
795
|
797
|
799
|
807
|
Trade
|
208
|
215
|
197
|
196
|
201
|
Consumption
|
793
|
807
|
806
|
807
|
813
|
Carryover stocks
|
285
|
273
|
264
|
265
|
259
|
year/year change
|
10
|
-12
|
|
-8
|
-6
|
Major exporters b)
|
70
|
63
|
60
|
62
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MAIZE
(CORN)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
1,166
|
1,231
|
1,216
|
1,217
|
1,269
|
Trade
|
181
|
199
|
182
|
182
|
183
|
Consumption
|
1,181
|
1,228
|
1238
|
1,238
|
1,263
|
Carryover stocks
|
293
|
296
|
275
|
274
|
280
|
year/year change
|
-16
|
3
|
|
-21
|
6
|
Major exporters c)
|
47
|
52
|
45
|
45
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOYABEANS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
377
|
396
|
418
|
418
|
427
|
Trade
|
173
|
179
|
180
|
180
|
183
|
Consumption
|
369
|
385
|
410
|
409
|
426
|
Carryover stocks
|
62
|
73
|
82
|
82
|
83
|
year/year change
|
8
|
11
|
|
9
|
1
|
Major exporters d)
|
17
|
22
|
23
|
25
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
million tonnes (milled
basis)
|
|
RICE
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
517
|
524
|
534
|
534
|
538
|
Trade
|
53
|
58
|
57
|
58
|
59
|
Consumption
|
521
|
523
|
532
|
531
|
536
|
Carryover stocks
|
173
|
174
|
176
|
176
|
178
|
year/year change
|
-4
|
1
|
|
3
|
2
|
Major exporters e)
|
44
|
48
|
51
|
51
|
51
|
Figures
may not add due to rounding. All calculations are based on unrounded figures.
a) Wheat and coarse grains.
b) Argentina, Australia, Canada, European Union, Kazakhstan,
Russian Federation, Ukraine, United States of America.
c) Argentina, Brazil, Ukraine, United States of America.
d) Argentina, Brazil, United States of America.
e) India, Pakistan, Thailand, United States of America, Viet Nam.
2 IGC/IMPROVING REPORTING OF RICE TRADE
2.1. The IGC Secretariat set up a working group of interested countries
to establish an accepted definition for Japonica rice to apply for a HS code
for the commodity.
2.2. Rice is a highly segmented commodity, with numerous grades and
varieties traded on world markets. Nevertheless, all rice can be categorised
into two distinct groups, namely Indica (long grain) and Japonica (short/medium
grain). These two groups of rice have very different price points and little
price transference between them, due to distinctive consumer preferences. Due
to the lack of a dedicated six-digit code within the Harmonised System (HS),
there is currently no means to comprehensively track global trade in Japonica
rice.
2.3. At the moment, there are four HS codes for rice: un-milled paddy
rice (HS100610), partly‑milled brown rice (HS100620), milled
rice (HS100630) and 100% broken rice (HS100640). The lack of a
standardised HS code for Japonica rice can pose some challenges in monitoring
the global rice market. Some exporters do provide data for Japonica shipments
through an extended (8‑10) digit HS Code, yet not all do. Moreover, while
some origins can be assumed to exclusively export Japonica due to the
composition of their local production, others produce both Indica and Japonica,
and would likely export a mix of the two, but no clear break down is provided.
2.4. In addition, there is no standardisation on the definition of
Japonica between countries using the extended 8-10 digit HS codes. The
introduction of a standardised six-digit HS code to enable the monitoring of
trade in Japonica rice would significantly improve global market transparency
and may aid both food security efforts and global trade discussions. However,
some challenges exist in creating such a code, including the way that trade in
rice is largely conducted as a processed product, as well as finding agreement
for an international definition of Japonica rice.
2.5. The objective of the working group is to make a proposal for
discussion within the UNWCO ahead of the next revision of the HS code in 2033.
3 ESTABLISHING A NEW DASHBOARD FOR NET
IMPORTING COUNTRIES AND TRADE MONITORING
3.1. Based on the data collected on FOB prices, real time shipping,
freight rates and IGC monthly forecasts, and with the support of the delegation
of Algeria, the IGC has developed a dashboard dedicated to soft wheat and durum
wheat.
3.2. The objective of this dashboard is to select the most relevant
information for a net importing country in order to increase the resilience of
its food security strategy, including the role of trade.
3.3. Five main pillars have been elaborated:
-_