Seventh Appraisal of the Trade Policy Review Mechanism
Report on the second DEDICATED SESSION ON the
secretariat report of 23 June 2023
Chairperson:
H.E. Mr Saqer Abdullah ALMOQBEL (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia)
1.
The second
dedicated session on Trade Policy Review (TPR) reports (so-called "Basket 2")
was held on 23 June 2023. The meeting was chaired by Ambassador H.E.
Mr Saqer ALMOQBEL (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia).
2.
The Chair opened
the meeting by highlighting Members' constructive spirit and positive
engagement during the first dedicated discussion on TPR reports held on 12 June
2023. The Chair said that, based on Members' many valuable and thoughtful
suggestions, he had reworked the draft conclusions contained in paragraph 2.10
of the revised informal Chair Note of 26 May 2023. The Secretariat
displayed the Chair's reworked draft conclusions on a screen during the meeting
for Members' consideration.
3.
The Chair further
noted that, in reworking the draft conclusions, he had sought to make them more
focused while keeping them sufficiently broad to allow for flexibility and
adaptability to changing circumstances. The Chair added that specific examples mentioned
by Members (including examples of new and emerging issues suggested for
inclusion in the Secretariat report) would appear in the relevant descriptive
part of the Chair Note, rather than the conclusions.
4.
Members welcomed
the Chair's reworked text and said that it accurately reflected the state of Members'
discussions on TPR reports. Noting that Members had consistently highlighted
the need for shorter and more focused Secretariat reports since the start of
the Seventh Appraisal, one Member suggested to strengthen the text in the
conclusion inviting the Secretariat to produce shorter and more focused
reports. In response, one Member said that the qualifier "to the extent
possible" contained in the Chair's reworked text was needed as the Secretariat
was simultaneously being encouraged to shorten its reports and cover additional
issues.
5.
One Member
commented on the Secretariat's use of so-called "non-official" sources
in its report and invited the Secretariat to use such sources with caution.
Another Member said it was important to preserve the independence in the
Secretariat's TPR reporting function and avoid any constraints on the
Secretariat's ability to make considered decisions on the use of sources.
6.
Several Members
said that the Secretariat report could play an important role in providing a
horizontal view of each Member's WTO notification record. Noting that TPRs
could support Members' adherence to notification commitments, while also
recalling that the TPR exercise was not intended to serve as a basis for the
enforcement of specific WTO obligations or to impose new policy commitments on
Members, several Members welcomed the reference in the Chair's reworked third
conclusion to "a qualified assessment of submitted and outstanding notifications"
in the Secretariat report. One Member commented that notifications should not
be a focus of the Secretariat report as they were already considered in
specific WTO bodies and said that its authorities were still evaluating the Chair's
reworked text on this issue.
7.
Several Members
referred to the synergies between TPRs and WTO technical assistance. It was
noted that the TPR process offered a good opportunity to connect capital-based
trade officials with WTO Secretariat experts to facilitate the preparation and
submission of notifications, including in the run up to a TPR. In this vein,
one Member encouraged the Secretariat to incorporate into its report the views
of the Member under review regarding the benefits of WTO technical assistance
received, possible improvements to make such assistance more effective, and
areas of further need, and suggested a specific amendment to the Chair's draft
text on this issue. Several Members supported the proposed text. One Member
said that the views of the Member under review on WTO technical assistance
received in the Secretariat report should be accompanied by relevant factual
information compiled by the Secretariat.
8.
Other points
raised by Members regarding the Secretariat report and related issues included:
(i) the Secretariat should be encouraged to coordinate closely with the
Member under review so that as many issues as possible can be resolved through
virtual meetings in advance of the Secretariat's visit to capital, and so that in-person
meetings with capital-based officials could be more efficient and effective;
(ii) the section on "trade policies by measure" (Section 3) is
the core of the Secretariat report and the Secretariat should therefore be
encouraged to shorten other sections of its report, including by moving the
description of the institutional framework in Section 2 to an annex or online
profile, and by focusing Section 1 (Economic Environment) on trade-related
issues; (iii) ensuring consistency across Secretariat reports is a top
priority for many Members; and (iv) the Secretariat should be encouraged
to give attention in its report to new and emerging trade policy areas,
including industrial support, trade-related environmental issues and supply chain
issues.
9.
Members broadly
supported the Chair's suggestion to include a reference to the Government report
in the descriptive part of the Chair Note rather than the conclusions.
10.
Some Members
underscored that they consider both the conclusions and the descriptive part of
the Chair Note, once finalized, as outcomes of the Seventh Appraisal.
11.
The Chair closed
the meeting by indicating that the next session on "TPR Reports" would
take place on Monday, 10 July 2023 at 3 p.m. in room D. He noted that the descriptive part of the report will be circulated
to Members before the third session of this first basket of issues. The Chair's
proposed conclusions resulting from this second dedicated session are contained
in Table 1 (below).
_______________
Table 1
Compared texts of the conclusions on Issue 2 of the revised informal Chair Note
Original text
|
Modified text
|
Comments
|
Issue 2
|
|
|
[(1) Members
agreed that the Secretariat should retain its independence and responsibility
in writing objective, coherent, and consistent reports across all Members.
Without compromising the quality of the information and analysis, the
Secretariat was invited, to the extent possible, to produce shorter, more
focused reports; be more analytical; and include new developments in trade
policies, as well as
outstanding specific issues raised in previous Reviews.]
|
[(1)
Members agreed that the Secretariat should retain its independence and responsibility
in writing objective, coherent, and consistent reports across all Members.]
|
[(1)
Members agreed that the Secretariat should retain its independence and
responsibility in writing objective, coherent, and consistent reports across
all Members.]
|
|
[(2) Members
invited the Secretariat to produce, to the extent possible, shorter,
objective and more focused reports, without compromising their quality, and
to cover issues relevant to new and emerging trade policies as well as
outstanding specific issues raised in the previous Review.]
|
[(2) Members
invited the Secretariat to produce[, to the extent
possible,] shorter, objective and more focused reports, without compromising their quality, and to
cover issues relevant to new and emerging trade policies as well as
outstanding specific issues raised in the previous Review.]
|
|
[(3) Members
encouraged the Secretariat to include in its report a qualitative assessment
of submitted and outstanding notifications as well as information on WTO
technical assistance provided to the developing Members under review.]
|
[(3) Members
encouraged the Secretariat to include in its report [a qualitative assessment of submitted and outstanding notifications] as well as [to invite the Member under review benefitting from WTO technical
assistance to give their views on the benefits thereof] information on WTO technical
assistance provided to the developing Members under review.]
|
[(2) Members
agreed that Government Reports should remain mandatory as set out in Annex 3 to the Marrakesh
Agreement Establishing the WTO. Members encouraged the Secretariat to
continue assisting Members, notably LDCs, in preparing such reports.]
|
[(2) Members agreed that Government Reports
should remain mandatory as set out in Annex 3 to the Marrakesh Agreement
Establishing the WTO. Members encouraged the Secretariat to continue
assisting Members, notably LDCs, in preparing such reports.]
|
[(2) Members agreed that Government Reports
should remain mandatory as set out in Annex 3 to the Marrakesh Agreement
Establishing the WTO. Members encouraged the Secretariat to continue
assisting Members, notably LDCs, in preparing such reports.]
|
__________