FREE TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA AND ISRAEL
(GOODS AND SERVICES)
QUESTIONS AND REPLIES
The following communication, dated 28 October 2025,
is being circulated at the request of the delegations of the Republic of Korea
and Israel.
 
_______________
 
 
Question from Japan
1.1.  ANNEX 3-B - COMMITTEE ON OUTWARD PROCESSING ZONES ON
THE KOREAN PENINSULA
Could you
provide information, if any, on the operation and implementation of Annex 3-B
following the entry into force of this FTA?
Reply
from the Republic of Korea:
The Committee on Outward Processing Zones on the Korean Peninsula was
established under the Joint Committee of this FTA, recognizing the importance
of intra-Korean economic cooperation and the promotion of peace and prosperity
on the Korean Peninsula. The main function of this committee is to identify
geographical areas and the criteria for recognition as an Outward Processing
Zone (OPZ) under this Agreement. This committee has not yet been convened. And
as stipulated in the Agreement, the Committee will be operated in an
appropriate manner through consultation between the Parties. Currently, no
relevant consultations have taken place.
Questions from Thailand
1.2.  1. TRADE ENVIRONMENT - 1.2 Trade in services and
investment
Based on
the information provided under paragraph 1.3 page 6, trade in services between
the two countries remains very limited, with Korea’s service exports to Israel
amounting to less than USD 10,000 per year. Thailand would like to inquire
whether the Government of the Republic of Korea has any measures or policies to
promote service exports, such as the establishment of businesses within Israel
or initiatives to attract Israeli nationals to utilize services in Korea.
Reply
from the Republic of Korea:
Regarding service exports, while there are no policies specifically
tailored for Israel, the Korean government is working to strengthen its policy
framework so that service exports receive a level of support comparable to
manufacturing exports. Key measures include financial assistance for small and
medium-sized enterprises, improved provision of market data and regulatory
information, the establishment of sector-specific export promotion strategies
for promising service industries such as digital, healthcare, and content
sectors, and an inter-ministerial and multi-agency support system to address
on-site challenges. In addition, new trade indicators for knowledge-intensive
services — including intellectual property royalties, information services,
communication services, and related sectors — have been developed to complement
traditional trade statistics.
Reply
from Israel:
In regard to paragraph 1.3, on page 6, there is a discrepancy between
the data in the factual presentation and the data provided by Israel’s Central
Bureau of Statistics (CBS). This is likely due to the fact that CBS figures are
expressed in thousands of USD. We will update the Secretariat in regard to this
matter. According to recent data by the CBS, Israel’s services exports to Korea
in 2024 amounted to USD 363 million, representing a growth of more than
30% since 2020. During the same period, Israeli services imports from Korea
totalled USD 23 million, reflecting a 43% increase since 2020. It is
important to note that CBS figures relate mainly to business services and do
not include telecommunication, transportation and tourism services. In
addition, both countries see strong potential in trade in services,
particularly in software and R&D.
1.3.  3. PROVISIONS ON TRADE IN GOODS
On
paragraph 3.1, page 9 illustrated that the provisions on National Treatment and
Market Access shall be governed by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
(GATT) 1994, as incorporated into this agreement. Exceptions include the
importation of non-Kosher meat by Israel. In this regard, Thailand hereby seek
Israel's clarification on its import practices and regulatory framework
pertaining to Kosher meat.
Reply
from Israel:
While the Ministry of Economy and Industry and the Ministry of
Agriculture and Food Security are involved in general import licensing,
sanitary and veterinary supervision, enforcement of the kosher import ban falls
principally under the Chief Rabbinate’s authority of Israel.
Israel's Meat and Meat Products Law, 1994, prohibits the import of
non-kosher meat, including poultry and their products, such as beef and mutton.
Under this framework, the Chief Rabbinate of Israel supervises kosher slaughter
(shechita) for imported meat, and issues or recognizes the required kosher
(kashrut) certification. 
The import of meat and poultry products therefore must be accompanied
by appropriate documentation certifying kosher slaughter and compliance with
the law.
1.4.  3. PROVISIONS ON TRADE IN GOODS
Regarding
3.1 Import duties and charges, and quantitative restrictions, Thailand would
like to seek clarification on the level of binding coverage of tariff
commitments under the Republic of Korea – Israel Free Trade Agreement. Thailand
understands that Korea has committed to tariff elimination on 91.5% of products
and Israel on 95.4%. However, it is unclear whether the remaining tariff lines
will be bound or excluded from tariff commitments under this FTA.
Reply
from the Republic of Korea:
According to the Factual Presentation (based on HS 2022) prepared by
the WTO Secretariat, the ROK’s rate of tariff elimination for products
originating from Israel is 94.79% (in number of tariff lines). Most of the
remaining tariff line of the ROK are bound by the base rate and other
tariff-related commitments in this FTA. Only 16 rice-related items are excluded
from all tariff-related commitments, including the base rate, under this
Agreement.
Reply
from Israel:
Of the remaining 408 tariff lines that remain dutiable, 389 are bound.
Sixteen (16) tariff lines are subject to a reduction of either 15 percent or 25
percent from the MFN base rate as of the date of signature of the Agreement,
while the remaining three (3) tariff lines are subject to preferential
treatment under tariff rate quotas (TRQs).
1.5.  4. PROVISIONS ON TRADE IN SERVICES AND INVESTMENT
Based on the information provided under
paragraph 4.23, the Republic of Korea continues to apply film quotas to protect
its domestic film industry and has established co-production arrangements with
certain partner countries, such as Israel, to promote collaborative creative
works. Under the Free Trade Agreements (FTAs), does the Republic of Korea have
co-production arrangements with other partner countries? Furthermore, what
considerations or restrictions might affect the implementation of such policies?
Reply
from the Republic of Korea:
Republic of Korea has ratified numerous audio-visual co-production
agreements with partner countries either under or in relation to the FTA
framework, including EU, China, India, Australia, and so forth. From an
implementation perspective, specific requirements to be acknowledged as a
co-produced work vary by agreement, but one of the most important things to
consider when implementing an agreement is assessing the financial contribution
of stakeholders, because relevant authorities might have different views on the
calculation of the budget spent. Like other FTAs, Parties resolve the dispute
through consultations and by mutual consent.
__________