SUBSIDIES
QUESTIONS POSED BY INDIA REGARDING THE NEW AND
FULL
SUBSIDY NOTIFICATION OF AUSTRALIA[1]
The
following communication, dated and received on 27 October 2025, is being
circulated at the request of the delegation of India.
_______________
Fisheries Research and Development
Corporation Investment Funding
Question 1
Given that the
FRDC provides co-funded grants to both public and private entities, including
businesses and individuals, how does Australia ensure that such funding does
not indirectly enhance fishing capacity or increase fishing effort?
Question 2
Could
Australia specify what proportion of the FRDC's AUD 33 million investments
in 2022‑2023 was directed toward projects related to capture fisheries versus
aquaculture?
Question 3
What
monitoring or reporting mechanisms are in place to ensure that research
outcomes funded under the FRDC do not lead to expansion of fishing in already
fully exploited or overfished stocks?
Fisheries
Assistance and User Engagement Package
Question 4
Under the Fishing
Business Assistance Grants, could Australia elaborate on the criteria used
to determine eligibility and the basis for compensation amounts?
Question 5
Does the Vessel
Monitoring System Assistance component involve subsidizing equipment or
installation costs? If so, could Australia specify the percentage of cost
covered and whether this is extended to all vessels or specific fleets?
Question 6
The
notification mentions an AUD 35 million allocation over the life of this
package. Could Australia share how much of this support went directly to
commercial fishers versus non-commercial (e.g., recreational or Indigenous)
users?
Question 7
Could
Australia clarify whether the Coral Sea Fishery Licence Buy-out program
involved permanent withdrawal of fishing capacity, and if so, how the
government ensures that equivalent capacity is not reintroduced elsewhere?
South East Trawl Fishery Structural Adjustment Package
Question 8
The package includes a partial waiver of AFMA levies for remaining
fishers. Could Australia clarify whether these waivers are considered income
support or cost-reduction measures, and how they are classified under the WTO
framework?
Question 9
The package includes a partial
waiver of AFMA levies for remaining fishers. Could Australia clarify
whether these waivers are considered income support or cost-reduction measures,
and how they are classified under the WTO framework?
Question 10
What
safeguards are in place to prevent fishers who have benefited from the buy-back
from re-entering the fishery or investing in other fisheries, thereby
undermining the intended sustainability benefits?
__________