fifth DEDICATED DISCUSSION OF THE RELEVANT
TRADE-RELATED DEVELOPMENTS FOR COTTON
1 July 2016
Report[1]
by the Chairman, H.E. Mr Vangelis Vitalis
1. Pursuant to the Bali Ministerial Decision on Cotton of 7 December
2013[2]
and the Nairobi Ministerial Decision on Cotton of 19 December 2015[3],
the fifth dedicated discussion of the relevant trade-related developments for
cotton took place on 1 July 2016, in the context of the Committee on
Agriculture in Special Session. The dedicated discussion was held back-to-back
with the 25th round of the Director-General's consultative
framework mechanism on the development aspects of cotton.
2. In my introductory remarks, I provided
an update on the state of play in the agriculture negotiations, including
cotton. I welcomed the fact that various Members had tabled questions aimed at stimulating constructive discussions on topics of
interest to them, and in particular on domestic support and cotton.
3. In particular, I drew Members' attention to the C-4's questions on cotton[4] and to the new submissions by the LDC
group[5] and by
Brazil with other co-authors[6], both of which included cotton elements. Along with the proponents, I invited Members to further reflect on
the questions posed and share their views at upcoming meetings of the Committee
on Agriculture in Special Session.
4. I noted that the dedicated discussions on cotton stemmed initially from
the Bali Ministerial Decision and that in the Nairobi Ministerial Decision Ministers
undertook to continue this bi-annual dedicated discussion of relevant
trade-related developments across the three pillars of Market Access, Domestic
Support and Export Competition in relation to cotton. In Nairobi, Ministers
also included specific new elements for monitoring under the Market Access
component of the Decision.
5. Once again, I reminded participants that this process was not a
negotiating forum per se but rather provided a
unique opportunity to have a constructive exchange around Members' cotton
trade-related policies from a WTO perspective and usefully inform our ongoing
negotiations on cotton.
6. In that regard, I noted that while external information like that
provided in the presentations by ICAC was extremely useful, nothing could
replace information coming from Members' notifications.
7. I pointed out that among the 32 Members identified as potential cotton
markets of interest for LDCs in the Secretariat's background paper, only five
Members could be considered as being up‑to‑date with their notifications on Domestic
Support. I stressed once more that the lack of notifications could significantly
impact our ability to conduct negotiations. Recalling paragraph 8 of the
Nairobi Ministerial Decision on Cotton which states that "… Members shall ensure that necessary transparency is provided through
regular notifications and the subsequent review process in the Committee on
Agriculture", I urged Members to update their notifications,
especially in the area of Domestic Support, which had been identified as the main
area of interest in the negotiations.
8. Under the agenda item "General Statements from
Members", Mali, on behalf of the Cotton‑4 (C-4), welcomed the
Nairobi Ministerial Decision on Cotton. The C-4 considered the Decision as an
encouraging step forward in the fields of Market Access and Export Competition,
as well as development-related aspects, and noted that the follow-up to
the implementation of the Decision would remain a priority.
9. However, the C-4 regretted the lack of results in the Domestic
Support pillar. The C-4 recalled the mandate to address cotton "ambitiously,
expeditiously and specifically", in line with the Hong Kong
Ministerial Declaration, and the Bali and Nairobi Decisions, and reaffirmed its
commitment and readiness to contribute to the resolution of this issue. The C-4
urged all Members to actively contribute towards the ultimate objective of achieving
an outcome on Domestic Support for cotton at the 11th Ministerial
Conference.
10. Benin, on behalf of the LDC group, supported the C-4's statement and
also welcomed the Market Access and Export Competition components of the
Nairobi Decision on Cotton. Making reference to its recent submission[7],
the LDC group also stressed the importance of achieving an outcome on Domestic
Support by the 11th Ministerial Conference, and urged relevant
Members to provide up-to-date and detailed data on their domestic support for
cotton and make proposals regarding the reduction of their trade-distorting supports.
11. The International Cotton Advisory Committee
(ICAC) made a detailed presentation[8]
on the latest developments in the global cotton market and trade trends.
12. The WTO Secretariat presented its revised
background paper[9]
which compiles factual
information and data from Members' notifications and other submissions to the
WTO on export subsidies, domestic support and market access, including both
tariff and non-tariff measures. The paper also includes Members' responses
to the questionnaires on cotton policy developments
circulated on 4 February 2015, 17 September 2015 and 22 February 2016[10],
as well as relevant information on cotton markets and policies from Trade
Policy Review reports.
13. The Secretariat
noted that in line with the Nairobi Ministerial Decision on Cotton, the
background paper also included a new addendum with Market Access-related data
for the cotton‑related products, listed in the Annex to the Decision.
14. I took that opportunity to once again urge Members to update their
notifications and actively reply to the cotton questionnaire. Several Members
echoed my concern regarding the lack of updated data on policy measures,
particularly from some major cotton producing and trading Members.
15. Members welcomed both presentations and thanked ICAC, in particular,
for its presence and participation in the dedicated discussions, highlighting
the importance of ICAC's contribution for substantive debates.
16. One Member encouraged ICAC to present updated information on government support to cotton, as was already done
at the fourth dedicated discussion. That information provided useful
context to assess the importance of domestic support in the cotton sector.
Another Member noted that high cotton prices were one of the underlying factors
behind the declining trend of cotton use in the textile industry. Some Members
also highlighted the role played by the evolution of stocks of cotton, in
particular in China.
17. Some Members suggested that ICAC's analysis also take into account other
aspects in addition to the macro picture of the cotton market, such as
average farm holding sizes and average earnings of cotton farmers. However,
another Member noted that looking at government support at per farmer level could
be biased, as the overall impact of support per farmer could also be
significant. Finally, one Member asked ICAC whether it had undertaken studies
to assess the environmental impact of cotton production in Africa.
18. The C-4 invited other organizations, in a position to do so, to provide
any relevant data they may have on cotton production, productivity and trade.
19. Several Members highlighted the fact that support levels remained high
in the cotton sector, with particularly negative impacts on developing
countries that provided no or little support to their cotton production. In
this regard, the C-4 noted that very high levels of domestic support could have a similar effect as with export subsidies when most
of the cotton production was exported.
20. At the request of one Member, and since such data were already
available in the annual note by the Secretariat on "Members participation
in the normal growth of world trade in agricultural products", it was
agreed that the Secretariat would include in the next revision of its background
paper information on cotton exports.
21. In relation to the Market Access section of the Secretariat's
document, the C-4 reiterated its call for Members to
provide disaggregated information on applied and preferential duties as well as
on tariff-rate quota levels for cotton imports from each LDC. The C-4 also noted that the tables in the
background paper showed that LDC Members did not yet have full duty free and
quota free (DFQF) access to some major cotton markets, including China, India
and the United States. The C‑4 called on developed countries
and developing ones in a position to do so, to indicate which steps were being
undertaken in order to provide DFQF cotton access for LDC countries, in accordance
with the Nairobi Ministerial Decision on Cotton. The C-4 also raised questions regarding
some sanitary and phytosanitary measures applied on cotton-related products.
22. Japan noted in
response to a question that its export financing support was in line with the
Nairobi Ministerial Decision. The repayment terms for exports of agricultural
products were very rarely more than 180 days, and cotton exports were
negligible.
23. Pakistan noted that its cotton sector had gone through significant
reforms over the last two decades, characterized by the removal of various governmental
forms of support and low applied import duties. Local farmers were therefore facing
important difficulties to compete with highly‑subsidized cotton farms in other
countries, and the cotton area was declining in Pakistan.
24. The United States briefed Members on its recently introduced Cotton
Ginning Cost-Share programme.[11] The United States noted that the payments for this programme would
be based on the 2015 cotton plantings and would be limited in scope by payment
caps and eligibility requirements for producers. One Member expressed its concern
about the estimated USD 300 million cost of this new programme.
25. China
shared some data regarding its cotton import and stock policies. China cited some
statistics which showed that it remained a significant global importer of
cotton during 2012-2015 and noted that such high volume of imports had resulted
in a decline of domestic production and acreage. China noted that it did not
intend to maintain its high stock levels as the purpose of importing cotton was
for use in textile processing. China noted two reasons for its increased stock:
(i) difficulties faced by local textile sectors due to tariff peaks and
escalation; and (ii) distortions in cotton prices resulting from high subsidies
by developed countries. China's intention was to continue to manage the release
of these stocks in a cautious, orderly and responsible manner.
26. In concluding the meeting, I noted that this dedicated discussion, the
first one following the Nairobi Ministerial Conference, had been very useful,
particularly thanks to the ICAC presentation which had sparked constructive exchanges.
I encouraged Members to continue engaging with each other to enhance their understanding
of their respective cotton policies.
__________
[1] This report is circulated under the Chair's own responsibility.
[2] Document WT/MIN(13)/41 – WT/L/916, dated 11 December 2013.
[3] Document WT/MIN(15)/46 – WT/L/981, dated 21 December 2015.
[4] Document JOB/AG/74
- TN/AG/SCC/GEN/15 dated 28 June 2016.
[5] Document JOB/AG/73 dated 22 June 2016.
[6] Document JOB/AG/72 dated 22 June 2016.
[7] Document JOB/AG/73 dated 22 June 2016.
[8] https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news16_e/cdac_01jul16_e.pdf.
[9] Documents TN/AG/GEN/34/Rev.4 – TN/AG/SCC/GEN/13/Rev.4 and
TN/AG/GEN/34/Rev.4/Add.1 – TN/AG/SCC/GEN/13/Rev.4/Add.1, dated 17 June 2016.
[10] The French and Spanish versions of this questionnaire were
circulated on 8 March 2016.
[11] This is addressed in the US response to the Secretariat's
questionnaire contained, together with Burkina Faso and Uganda's replies, in
document TN/AG/GEN/34/Rev.4/Add.2 – TN/AG/SCC/GEN/13/Rev.4/Add.2 dated 26 July
2016.