REPORT (2015) OF THE COMMITTEE ON RULES OF
ORIGIN
TO THE COUNCIL FOR TRADE IN GOODS
1. This report is being submitted to
the Council for Trade in Goods in accordance with Article 6.1 of the
Agreement on Rules of Origin (the Agreement), which provides that "The Committee shall review annually the implementation
and operation of Parts II and III of this Agreement having regard to its
objectives. The Committee shall annually
inform the Council for Trade in Goods of developments during the period covered
by such reviews."
2. The Committee on Rules of Origin (CRO) held two formal meetings in 2015: on 30 April
and on 15 October under the chairmanship of Mr. Ken Chang-keng CHEN
(Chinese Taipei) and of Mr. Christian WEGENER (Denmark) respectively. In addition, the Committee held a dedicated
informal session on preferential rules of origin for Least-developed countries.
A number of informal meetings and
consultations were also held in 2015. At its meeting of 15 October, the CRO
conducted the twenty-first review of the implementation and operation of the
Agreement and took note of the notifications that had been submitted during the
year.
3. The main area of work of the CRO
relates to negotiations to harmonize non‑preferential rules of origin (Harmonization
Work Programme, HWP). These negotiations, mandated under Part IV of the
Agreement, were initiated in 1995 and conducted in collaboration with the
Technical Committee on Rules of Origin at the World Customs Organization (WCO).
Despite substantive progress in elaborating specific rules of origin for
thousands of tariff lines, the negotiations came to a virtual halt in 2007 due
to divergences on a number of "core policy issues" and have since
lost momentum. As noted in the 2013
Report of the CRO to the Council for Trade in Goods (G/L/1047), Members hold
different views regarding the need to finalize or not the HWP. Given this differences, it is difficult
for the Chairman to propose any technical work on the draft harmonized rules of
origin.
4. Pending the continuation of the HWP,
the Committee agreed to initiate a transparency exercise to exchange
information about non-preferential rules of origin currently in place. In fact, in the absence of harmonized rules,
the only disciplines that apply to non-preferential rules of origin are those
of Article 2 of the WTO Agreement on Rules of Origin. Therefore, some Members
presented to the Committee their current non-preferential rules of origin and
shared their experiences regarding application of such rules. In addition, the
Committee also heard presentations about the impact of rules of origin on
international trade and on customs operations from the World Customs
Organization (WCO), the International Trade Centre (ITC), the International
Chamber of Commerce and the UNCTAD.
5. Furthermore, the Committee reviewed
the results of the transposition exercise which had been conducted by the
Secretariat. All draft harmonized rules
of origin have now been transposed to the most recent version of the Harmonized
System (2012) and compiled in a single document (JOB/RO/5/Rev.1 and
JOB/RO/5/Rev.1/Corr.1). Members agreed that comments to the draft transposed
rules should be sent to the Secretariat by 15 March 2016 and that the Committee
should consider this item again at its next meeting.
6. With respect to preferential rules
of origin, the Committee held dedicated discussions on the rules which apply to
LDCs under preferential trade agreements. At the meeting, Members heard
presentations made by several LDC representatives and learnt more about how
existing rules of origin may hinder market access opportunities for the LDCs.
For each agenda item, the LDCs recalled the "benchmarks" set in the
2013 Bali Ministerial Decision on Rules of Origin for LDCs (WT/L/917) and
provided examples of existing rules which, according to them, did not meet
these benchmarks. For each agenda item,
the LDCs proposed specific reforms which, according to them, would enhance
their ability to effectively use preferential market access opportunities.
7. Finally, the CRO also conducted a review
of new developments in preferential rules of origin for LDCs according to the
requirements of Ministerial Decision WT/L/917.
In that context, the Committee considered the preferential rules of
origin in place in Thailand (G/RO/N/130/Corr.1) and in China (G/RO/N/132) and
recent modifications made to the rules applied by Japan (G/RO/N/131). As mandated by the Ministerial Decision, the
Committee adopted a report of such review for the General Council and will also
inform the Sub-Committee on LDCs accordingly.
__________