REPORT of THE INTERNATIONAL PLANT PROTECTION
CONVENTION SECRETARIAT (IPPC)
(As of 20 june 2014)
The following communication,
received on 4 July 2014, is being circulated at the request of the International
Plant Protection Convention secretariat (IPPC).
_______________
1 Introduction
1.1. This report covers general activities which have taken place
subsequent to our last report in March 2014 (i.e. the period March 2014 – June
2014).
1.2. The Ninth Session of Commission on Phytosanitary Measures (CPM-9)
took place from 31 March to 4 April 2014. Activities taking place in the
areas of Capacity Development are presented in another document.
1.3. The Committee is invited to note that the current number of
contracting parties to the IPPC is 181 (no new members in the covered period).
2 Standard Setting Work Programme
2.1 International Standards on Phytosanitary Measures (ISPMs) adopted by
CPM-9 (2014)
2.1. CPM-9 (2014) adopted the following ISPMs:
·
Appendix 1 to
ISPM 12 (Phytosanitary Certificates) on Electronic certification, information on standard XML schemes and
exchange mechanisms;
·
Annex 2 to ISPM
26 (Establishment of pest free areas for fruit flies
(Tephritidae)) on Control measures for an
outbreak within a fruit fly-pest free area; and,
·
Phytosanitary
Treatment (PT) 15: Vapour heat treatment for Bactrocera
cucurbitae on Cucumis melo
var. reticulatus to be included as an annex
in ISPM 28:2007 (Phytosanitary Treatments)
2.2. CPM-9 (2014) also noted that the Standards Committee (SC) adopted on
behalf of CPM:
·
Diagnostic
Protocol (DP) 4: Tilletia indica Mitra (2004-014)
as an annex to ISPM 27:2006 (Diagnostic protocols for
regulated pests).
2.3. All ISPMs are published on the IPP.[1]
2.4. Formal objections were received 14 days prior to the CPM-9 (2014) on
the draft ISPM on the Determination of host
status of fruit to fruit fly (Tephritidae) (2006-031) and on seven
draft phytosanitary treatments. The formal objections on draft ISPM on the Determination of host status of fruit to fruit fly
(Tephritidae) (2006-031) have been reviewed by the SC and forwarded to the TPFF
for their consideration. The formal objections on the seven draft phytosanitary
treatments have been forwarded by the SC to the Technical Panel on
Phytosanitary Treatments (TPPT) for their consideration.
2.5. The draft diagnostic protocol on Phyllosticta citricarpa
(McAlpine) Aa on fruit (2004-023) had received a formal objection during the
notification period (15 December 2013 - 30 January 2014). Details on this
formal objection can be found on the IPP.[2]
2.2 List of topics for IPPC Standards
2.6. CPM-9 (2014) reviewed and modified the List of Topics for IPPC
Standards by:
a.
Adding the
following topics:
·
Guidance
on pest risk management, with priority 1 and IPPC
Strategic Objectives A and C
·
Authorization
of non-NPPO entities to perform phytosanitary actions, with priority 3 and IPPC Strategic Objective C
·
Requirements
for the use of chemical treatments as a phytosanitary measure, with priority 3 and IPPC Strategic Objectives A, B and C
·
Requirements
for the use of fumigation as a phytosanitary measure, with priority 1 and IPPC Strategic Objectives A, B and C
·
Requirements
for the use of temperature treatments as a phytosanitary measure, with priority 1 and IPPC Strategic Objectives A, B and C
·
Requirements
for the use of modified atmosphere treatments as a phytosanitary measure, with priority 2 and IPPC Strategic Objectives A, B and C
·
Requirements
for the use of irradiation as a phytosanitary measure (Revision to ISPM 18), with priority 2 and IPPC Strategic
Objectives A, B and C
b.
Deleting the
following topics:
·
Surveillance
for citrus canker (Xanthomonas
axonopodis pv. citri)
(2002-001)
·
Systems approach
for management of citrus canker (Xanthomonas axonopodis
pv. citri) (2003-001)
·
The following
specific topics under the Technical Panel for Phytosanitary Treatments:
-
Irradiation
treatments (2006-014)
-
Wood
packaging material treatments (2006-015)
-
Fruit
fly treatments (2006-024)
-
Soil
and growing media in association with plants: treatments (2009-006)
2.7. Regarding the draft ISPM on Minimizing pest movement by sea
containers (2008-001), CPM‑9 (2014) welcomed the recent adoption of the Code of
Practice for Packing of Cargo Transport Units (CTU Code) by UNECE and looked
forward to the adoption also by IMO and ILO of the revised CTU Code later this
year. The SC in May 2014 reviewed the conceptual comments submitted on the
draft ISPM but deferred this topic for further review to the November 2014 SC
meeting.
2.3 Substantial Concerns Commenting Period
2.8. The following draft ISPMS were approved by the SC-7 for the
Substantial Concerns Commenting Period[3]
(1 June - 30 September 2014):
·
Amendments
to ISPM 5 (Glossary of phytosanitary
terms) (1994-001)
·
International
movement of growing media in association with plants for planting (2005-004)
·
International
movement of wood (2006-029)
·
Phytosanitary
procedures for Fruit Fly (Tephritidae) management (2005-010)
2.9. Comments must be submitted through the IPPC contact point using the
Online Comment System.
2.4 Member Consultation
2.10. The following draft ISPMS were approved by the SC for Member
Consultation[4]
(1 July – 30 November 2014):
·
Draft ISPM:
Amendments to ISPM 5: Glossary of Phytosanitary
Terms (1994-001)
·
Draft ISPM: International movement of seeds (2009-003)
·
Draft ISPM: International movement of used vehicles, machinery and equipment
(2006-004)
·
Draft DP: Ditylenchus destructor / D. dipsaci (2004-017)
·
Draft DP: Erwinia amylovora (2004-009)
·
Draft DP: Genus Anastrepha spp. (2004-015)
·
Draft DP: Phytoplasmas (general) (2004-018)
·
Draft PT: Cold
treatment for Ceratitis capitata on Citrus clementina var. Clemenules (2010-102)
·
Draft PT: Cold
treatment for Ceratitis capitata on Citrus sinensis var. Navel and Valencia-late (2010-103)
·
Draft PT: High
temperature forced air treatment for Bactrocera melanotus
and B. xanthodes (diptera: tephritidae)
on Carica papaya (2009-105)
·
Draft PT:
Phytosanitary Treatment on Irradiation for Ostrinia nubilalis
(2012-009)
·
Draft PT: Vapour
heat treatment for Bactrocera dorsalis
on Carica papaya var. solo (2009-109)
·
Draft PT: Vapour
heat treatment for Ceratitis capitata
on Mangifera indica (2010-106)
2.11. Comments must be submitted through the IPPC contact point using the
Online Comment System.
2.5 Draft Specifications approved by the SC in May 2014
2.12. The following Specifications were approved by the SC:
·
Specification 60:
International movement of grain (2008-007)
·
Specification 61:
Revision of ISPM 6, Guidelines for Surveillance (2009-004)
2.13. Due to the high volume of diagnostic protocols that are foreseen to
be finalized for member consultation in the coming few years, two member
consultation periods for diagnostic protocols will be held annually starting in
2015 (1 February 2015 and 1 July 2015).
2.6 Call for experts
2.14. The IPPC made two calls for experts since March 2014:
·
DP authors for
the draft DP on Anoplophora spp. (2004-020)[5]
·
Call for
participants for Expert Consultation on phytosanitary treatments for the Bactrocera dorsalis complex (details are provided below)
2.15. More information on the call for experts to the Expert Consultation
on phytosanitary treatments for the Bactrocera dorsalis
complex is below.
2.7 Expert Consultation on Phytosanitary Treatments for the Bactrocera dorsalis complex
2.16. An Expert Consultation on Phytosanitary Treatments for Bactrocera dorsalis complex, will be held in Okinawa, Japan
1-5 December 2014. The IPPC Secretariat is soliciting nominations for qualified
experts and scientists to participate in this expert consultation. Invited
experts would be expected to share an overview of treatments they have
developed and through discussion, participants should be able to identify and
agree how to address the main issues in the development of B. dorsalis
complex treatments such as experimental design, statistical analyses,
confirmatory trials, treatment evaluation and treatment submission. Nominations
may be submitted to the IPPC Secretariat (ippc@fao.org)
no later than 29 August 2014. Further information may be found on the IPP.[6]
2.8 Standard setting calendar
2.17. The standard setting calendar is presented on the IPP.[7]
3 National Reporting Obligations
3.1 Contact points
3.1. The IPPC Secretariat strongly requests that the member countries
update the IPPC contact points, as a basic path for any information exchange,
to properly provide their information with the Secretariat, other countries as
well as broader stakeholders. International Phytosanitary Portal (IPP) https://www.ippc.int.
3.2. The IPPC Secretariat encourages countries to visit the IPPC website
for updates as there continues to be a lot of information being made available
by countries, along with news and official information from the
Secretariat. The Secretariat is
constantly seeking ways to improve the IPP to increase its efficiency and
improve the appearance and responsiveness. While this has caused some technical
issues, the ultimate result will be a much more responsive and informative IPPC
webpage.
3.3. Meanwhile, information continues to be added to the IPP by
countries. New formats for accessing information are also being developed e.g. https://www.ippc.int/countries/pestreports-map.
3.4. The information available through the IPP has substantially
increased, in particular for the area of capacity development by the time of
CPM-9 (March, 2014), and is available through:
i.
Phytosanitary
Resource Page: http://www.phytosanitary.info
ii. IRSS: https://www.ippc.int/index.php?id=1111059&L=0#irssactivities
iii. IRSS Help Desk: https://www.ippc.int/index.php?id=1111059&L=0#helpdesk
iv. IPPC Projects Database: http://projects.phytosanitary.info
v. eLearning: http://elearning.phytosanitary.info
vi.
A summary of IPPC
Publications: https://www.ippc.int/about/mediakit
3.2 National Reporting Obligations Advisory Group (NROAG)
3.5. The CPM recognizes that substantial further improvement in NROs
should take place to meet the reporting obligations in the New Revised Text of
the IPPC Convention (1997) and to this end CPM established NROAG, which will
meet during early July, 2014. The group will review the current NRO programme,
develop action plan for further improvements, made suggestions to effectively
improvement the programme, and will ultimately report to the CPM-10.
3.6. IPPC contracting parties will see a substantial increase in NRO
activity in the near future and countries are encouraged to engage
appropriately to ensure the whole NRO system functions more effectively and
with more timely and accurate information.
4 Communications
4.1. As a follow up to the IPPC Communications Strategy adopted by CPM-8
(2013), the Secretariat is developing and will implement a communications work
plan based on the completed IPPC communications needs assessment. This will
provide the IPPC a clearer framework which will target the appropriate
audiences and all the plan to be implemented in a more systematic manner for
maximum cost effectiveness.
4.2. The following social media pages for the IPPC are available:
i.
Facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/International-Plant-Protection-Convention-IPPC/113230338690380?ref=tn_tnmn
ii. Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/ippcnews
iii. LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=3175642&trk=hb_side_g
iv. Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/groups/international_plant_protection_convention/
v.
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/IPPCnews
5 Dispute Settlement
5.1. A case is currently under the IPPC dispute settlement process, and a
meeting of Subsidiary Body on Dispute Settlements will take place shortly to
review the IPPC dispute settlement advocacy material.
6 Implementation Review and support system (IRSS)
6.1. The first three year cycle of the IRSS concluded in March 2014.
During the implementation period it focused much of its efforts on the Review
element of the programme. A second cycle, which began in April 2014, is
expected to focus on strengthening the Support element using largely the
outputs of the first cycle in particular the data gathered through its many
surveys.
6.2. The IRSS has had notable impact resulting in stimulating the CPM to
discuss the need for a more focussed approach on implementation activities. In
this regard the CPM decided to establish an open ended working group on
Implementation which will convene in Rome in August 2014 to consider the
elements for such a programme including a pilot activity on pest surveillance
building on current IPPC and IPPC partner activities and the results of the
work of the IRSS.
6.3. The ISPMs that were analysed by the IRSS include: ISPM 4:1995
Requirements for the establishment of pest free areas; ISPM 8:1998
Determination of pest status in an area; ISPM 6:1997 Guidelines for
surveillance; ISPM 13:2001 Guidelines for the notification of non-compliance
and emergency action; ISPM 17:2002 Pest reporting and ISPM 19:2003 Guidelines
on lists of regulated pests. These standards all relate to a large extent on
pest surveillance and therefore will provide baseline information for
prospective implementation activities.
6.4. The IRSS conducted two studies, one on Aquatic Plants and the other
on Internet Trade (E‑Commerce) during the first implementation cycle. Two IPPC
recommendations were prepared for CPM consideration based on these studies
6.5. IRSS products can be downloaded at: http://irss.ippc.int/activities/.
7 CPM Reccomendations
7.1. CPM-9 (2014) adopted the following two CPM Recommendations:
·
CPM-9/2014/01 on IPPC coverage of aquatic plants; and
·
CPM-9/2014/02 on Internet trade (e-commerce) in plants and other regulated articles
(https://www.ippc.int/core-activities/governance/cpm/cpm-recommendations).
7.2. It was also agreed that a proposal for a CPM recommendation on pest
movement by sea containers be developed and presented to CPM-10 (2015).
8 Resource Mobilization
8.1. The Secretariat would like to thank all those contracting parties
and other donors who contributed to the 2013 budget and activities of the IPPC.
The IPPC once again encourages them to consider future, sustainable
contributions. These donations will help to ensure the core work programme will
be delivered. A full list of support is made available to CPM each year and can
be found at: https://www.ippc.int/resource-mobilisation.
8.2. The sustainability of the IPPC Secretariat, and hence the work
programme of the IPPC, continues to be addressed as a high priority on an
on-going basis. The current resource allocation (financial and human resources)
measured against projected tasks is not sustainable. The Secretariat staff
continues to engage in discussions with the governing body as well as
traditional and non-traditional partners to improve the situation.
8.3. It cannot be stressed enough that it is essential the IPPC receive
regular and predictable contributions to provide sustainability to the work
programme. The FAO continues to faces severe financial challenges and is
seeking cost reduction efforts in most areas; as a result the resources
available to the IPPC activities continue to be affected, specifically in the
area of information technology and support for the On-line Comment System.
8.4. The Secretariat remains open to any discussion with members or
partner organizations that could provide solutions to the current challenges,
particularly in the medium to long term.
9 Electronic Certification in the IPPC (ePhyto)
9.1. The issue of ePhyto is a high priority for CPM and the revised
Appendix 1 (Electronic certification, information on standard
XML schemes and exchange mechanisms (2006-003)) to ISPM 12:2011 is
out for member consultation (See above, section III.C.). The IPPC Secretariat
has created an ePhyto web page (http://ephyto.ippc.int/)
on the IPP containing information on codes and schema to be used in ePhytos.
9.2. After the CPM discussions on the result of ePhyto hub feasibility
study[8],
the ePhyto Steering Group will discuss to propose further actions on this
issue. The IPPC believes this represents a potential opportunity for future
collaboration with OIE and Codex.
9.3. General information on ePhyto can be found on the IPPC Website at: http://www.ippc.int/index.php?id=1111140
or obtained from the IPPC Secretariat (ippc@fao.org).
10 Cooperation with the WTO Standard Setting Organizations
10.1. The IPPC secretariat would like to draw attention to the following
current on-going activities with Codex and OIE:
i.
Codex and the
IPPC continue explore ways of addressing their IT needs in a more sustainable
manner and share tools and skills when appropriate;
ii. Codex and the IPPC are now collaborating fully in the operational
maintenance and improvement of the OCS;
iii. Codex, OIE and the IPPC continue to engage in consultations on
Standard Trade and Development Facility (STDF) activities to understand each
other’s positions and coordinate activities and responses;
iv. There is ongoing cooperation between the "three sisters"
on SPS-related capacity development projects, if and when appropriate;
v. The Secretariat continues to participate in coordination meetings
between the "three sisters" to improve coordination and collaboration
in SPS Committee meetings;
vi. Ad-hoc consultations are undertaken as and when subjects arise that
are of mutual interest; and
vii. The Secretariat is committed to sustaining the deeper relationship
between the "three sisters" to address future issues in the SPS
Committee Secretariat and beyond.
11 oTHER IPPC aCTIVITIES related to THE wto
11.1. As indicated previously, the IPPC formally requested the opportunity
to become a member of the Preparatory Committee for the Agreement on Trade
Facilitation (ATF) to contribute to the legal review process, but no replies
have been received. If the General Council adopts the ATF text as revised after
the legal review process, the ATF will be open for acceptance until July 2015.
By that time, developing countries are supposed to submit the commitments of
Articles in relation with Categories A, B and C (with designations of
implementation dates and requests for assistance), according to the Section II
of the ATF. As the SPS related authorities get properly involved in the
national process for such commitments, we wish to help countries to address the
issue when interpretation becomes clearer. The IPPC Secretariat would like to
continuously seek an opportunity to focus on reducing impediments to the smooth
flow of trade while assuring national governments that all phytosanitary
concerns have been addressed.
__________