| # | 日期 | 標題 | 作者 | 出處 | 摘要 |
|
1
| 2025/04/16 | Trump orders Section 232 investigation of critical mineral imports | David LaRoss | Inside U.S. Trade | President Trump is directing the Commerce Department to investigate the national security implications of U.S. reliance on imported critical minerals, including many whose production has long been dominated by China, in a first step toward potential tariffs on the sector, subsidies for domestic producers or other moves to rebalance the industry. |
|
2
| 2025/04/16 | AFL-CIO’s Feingold: We can’t have ‘fair playing field’ without ILAB | Margaret Spiegelman | Inside U.S. Trade | Major cuts at the Labor Department’s Bureau of International Labor Affairs (ILAB) will set back long-term U.S. work to support “fair” trade, AFL-CIO international department director Cathy Feingold said at a rally of worker rights advocates and others at the department’s headquarters in Washington. |
|
3
| 2025/04/16 | Sen. Shaheen warns of tariffs’ impacts on military readiness, defense supply chains | Dan Dupont | Inside U.S. Trade | Steep new tariffs imposed and threatened by President Trump will increase prices for goods purchased by the Pentagon, weakening supply chains and stressing military readiness and spending plans, the ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee warns. |
|
4
| 2025/04/16 | WTO, citing tariffs, says global trade outlook for 2025 has ‘deteriorated sharply’ | Hannah Monicken | Inside U.S. Trade | Amid a raft of new tariffs and the ensuing uncertainty, the global trade outlook has “deteriorated sharply,” the World Trade Organization said on Wednesday in a new report, finding that the volume of goods trade is expected to be almost three percentage points lower that it would have been before recent trade policy changes. |
|
5
| 2025/04/16 | California files lawsuit challenging Trump’s tariffs | Jason Asenso | Inside U.S. Trade | California on Wednesday filed a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose sweeping tariffs that Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) called “reckless.” |
|
6
| 2025/04/15 | White House weighs farm subsidies in repeat of first-term Trump policy | David LaRoss | Inside U.S. Trade | President Trump and Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins are considering a new round of direct payments to farmers affected by U.S. tariffs and trading partners’ retaliation, according to White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt and Rollins -- though a final decision on the policy might not come for “months.” |
|
7
| 2025/04/15 | Milei: Argentina ‘ready’ to ink reciprocal trade deal | Jason Asenso | Inside U.S. Trade | Argentine President Javier Milei is eager to sign a reciprocal trade agreement with the U.S., he said on Monday following the launch of talks with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. |
|
8
| 2025/04/15 | Conservative group sues Trump over IEEPA tariffs, trade deficit emergency | Brett Fortnam | Inside U.S. Trade | The Trump administration is facing another legal challenge over its imposition of tariffs under the International Economic Emergency Powers Act, with the conservative Liberty Justice Center charging that the national emergency underpinning the new tariff regime is merely a figment of the president’s imagination. |
|
9
| 2025/04/15 | Commerce moves to end tomato deal with Mexico, reimpose duties | Margaret Spiegelman | Inside U.S. Trade | The Commerce Department said it intends to terminate a 2019 agreement with Mexico suspending antidumping duties on tomatoes, setting a 90-day clock until duties go into effect unless Mexico and the U.S. reach a new understanding. |
|
10
| 2025/04/15 | Justice asks courts to consolidate IEEPA tariff litigation before CIT | David LaRoss | Inside U.S. Trade | The Justice Department is asking courts to consolidate all litigation over President Trump’s recent International Economic Emergency Powers Act tariffs into one case before the U.S. Court of International Trade -- a bid that if successful would avoid the possibility of contradictory decisions on whether his first-time use of that law to impose tariffs was legal. |
|