China – Domestic Support for Agricultural
Producers
RECOURSE TO ARTICLE 22.6 OF THE DSU BY China
The following
communication, dated 27
July 2020, from the delegation of China to the Chairperson of the Dispute
Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 22.6 of the DSU.
_______________
Regarding
the United States' recourse to Article 22.2 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes
("DSU") in the dispute China - Domestic Support
for Agricultural Producers (WT/DS511), my authorities have
instructed me to inform you that China disagrees with the United States'
allegation that China has failed to bring its measures into compliance with its
WTO obligations. As detailed in its communication on 18 June 2020
(WT/DS511/15/Add.2), China has brought its relevant domestic measures into full
compliance with the DSB's rulings and recommendations.
China
maintains that any disagreement on the consistency of its measures taken to
comply with DSB's the rulings and recommendations must be resolved in
proceedings under Article 21.5 of the DSU, before any level of suspension of
concessions or obligations can be assessed under Article 22 of the DSU.
In
these circumstances, and pursuant to Article 22.6 of the DSU, China objects to the level of
suspension of concessions and related obligations "under
the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
1994 or other agreements listed in Annex 1A of the WTO Agreement" proposed by the
United States
in document WT/DS511/17.[1]
Accordingly,
as required by Article 22.6 of the DSU[2],
the matter shall be referred to arbitration.
China
notes that the United States' recourse to Article 22.2 in this matter is
inscribed on the agenda of the DSB for 29 July 2020. China reserves the right
to make a statement concerning the US recourse at that meeting.
[1] The United States' request in document WT/DS511/17 is limited to the suspension of concessions
or other obligations "under the General
Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 or other agreements listed in
Annex 1A of the WTO Agreement". Accordingly, any proposed suspension
of concessions or obligations in another sector or under another agreement
would not follow the principles and procedures set forth in Article 22.3
of the DSU.
[2] Pursuant to Article 22.6 of the
DSU, "if the Member concerned objects to the level of suspension proposed,
… the matter shall be referred to arbitration".