China – anti-dumping measures on imports of
cellulose pulp from Canada
Report of the Panel
BCI
deleted, as indicated [***]
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
1 Introduction.. 9
1.1 Complaint by Canada. 9
1.2 Panel establishment and composition. 9
1.3 Panel proceedings. 9
1.3.1 General 9
1.3.2 Additional working procedures
concerning business confidential information (BCI) 10
2 Factual aspects. 10
3 Parties' requests for
findings and recommendations. 11
4 Arguments of the
parties. 11
5 Arguments of the thiRd
parties. 11
6 Interim review... 11
7 Findings. 11
7.1 Introduction. 11
7.2 General principles regarding treaty
interpretation, the applicable standard of review, and burden of proof 12
7.2.1 Treaty interpretation. 12
7.2.2 Standard of review.. 12
7.2.3 Burden of proof 13
7.3 The legal framework for injury
determination. 13
7.4 Whether MOFCOM's consideration of the
volume of dumped imports was consistent with Articles 3.1 and 3.2 of the
Anti‑Dumping Agreement 18
7.4.1 Introduction. 18
7.4.2 Legal standard under Articles 3.1
and 3.2, first sentence. 19
7.4.3 MOFCOM's consideration of the volume of
dumped imports. 22
7.5 Whether MOFCOM's consideration of price
effects was consistent with Articles 3.1 and 3.2 of the Anti‑Dumping
Agreement 25
7.5.1 Introduction. 25
7.5.2 Legal standard under Article 3.2, second sentence. 26
7.5.3 MOFCOM's consideration of parallel price trends. 27
7.5.4 MOFCOM's consideration of the fact that
dumped imports were sold at higher prices than the domestic like product 31
7.5.5 MOFCOM's consideration of changes in
the dumped imports' market share. 33
7.5.6 MOFCOM's consideration of certain
business information. 36
7.5.7 MOFCOM's consideration of evidence and
factors collectively. 38
7.6 Whether MOFCOM's examination of the
impact of dumped imports was consistent with Articles 3.1 and 3.4 of the
Anti‑Dumping Agreement 39
7.6.1 Introduction. 39
7.6.2 Legal standard under Articles 3.1 and 3.4. 39
7.6.3 MOFCOM's evaluation of market share. 40
7.6.4 MOFCOM's evaluation of injury factors
showing positive trends. 42
7.7 Whether MOFCOM's demonstration of
causation and examination of other factors causing injury were consistent with
Articles 3.1 and 3.5 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement 44
7.7.1 Introduction. 44
7.7.2 Legal standard under Articles 3.1
and 3.5. 45
7.7.3 MOFCOM's demonstration of causation. 45
7.7.4 MOFCOM's examination of other known
factors allegedly causing injury and non‑attribution 48
7.7.4.1 Cotton and VSF prices. 48
7.7.4.1.1 Introduction. 48
7.7.4.1.2 Cotton prices. 49
7.7.4.1.3 VSF prices. 52
7.7.4.2 Domestic industry overexpansion,
overproduction, and inventory build-up. 53
7.7.4.3 Impact of non-dumped imports. 58
7.7.4.4
Shortage of cotton linter 61
7.8
Consequential claims. 63
8 Conclusions and
Recommendation.. 63