UNITED STATES – CONTINUED DUMPING AND
SUBSIDY OFFSET ACT OF 2000
Communication from Japan
The following communication,
dated 18 September 2015, from the delegation of Japan to the Chairperson of the
Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated at the request of that delegation.
_______________
On
26 November 2004, the Dispute Settlement Body ("DSB") granted
authorization to Japan to suspend concessions and related obligations under the
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994
("GATT 1994") in accordance with the decision of the Arbitrator in United States – Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (WT/DS217/ARB/JPN).
The authorization was made pursuant to
Japan's request made under Article 22.7 of the Understanding
on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes ("DSU")
(WT/DS217/24). In that request, Japan
undertook to notify the DSB every year the list indicating the level of
additional import duties on the selected products, prior to the entry into
force of a level of suspension of concessions or other obligations.
On 18 August 2005, Japan
notified the DSB that it was suspending, as of 1 September 2005, the
applications of concessions and related obligations under GATT 1994 on imports
of certain products originating in the United States (WT/DS217/48). Japan was
extending the suspension of concessions for the second year starting from 1
September 2006 (WT/DS217/50), the third year starting from 1 September 2007 (WT/DS217/52),
the fourth year starting from 1 September 2008 (WT/DS217/54), the fifth year
starting from 1 September 2009 (WT/DS217/56), the sixth year starting from 1
September 2010 (WT/DS217/58), the seventh year starting from 1 September 2011
(WT/DS217/60), the eighth year starting from 1 September 2012 (WT/DS217/62) and
the ninth year starting from 1 September 2013 (WT/DS217/64). Japan notified the
DSB that no suspension of concessions or other obligations in the form of the
imposition of additional import duties would be applied by Japan for the tenth
year, while it retains its rights under Article 22.7 of the DSU as it
acknowledges that the considerable amount remains undisbursed and the United
States might execute another round of disbursements to its domestic companies
under the CDSOA after 2014.
Based on the amount of relevant
disbursements to US companies which was identified in the CDSOA Annual Report
for Fiscal Year 2014, published by US Customs and Border Protection, Japan's
level of authorization established through arbitration under Article 22.6
continue to be marginal.
Accordingly, Japan continues its
non-application of the suspension of concessions or other obligations in the
form of the imposition of additional import duties. As Japan acknowledges that
the considerable amount remains undisbursed and the United States might execute
another round of disbursements to its domestic companies under the CDSOA, Japan
retains its rights under Article 22.7 of the DSU. Further, Japan's decision not
to suspend concessions and related obligations does not mean in any sense that
Japan accepts the contention of the United States that its measure found to be
inconsistent with the covered agreements has been removed within the meaning of
Article 22.8 of the DSU.
Japan would be grateful if you
could ask the Secretariat to circulate this notification to the Members of the
DSB.
__________