Indonesia – Recourse to Article 22.2 of the DSU in
the
US – Clove Cigarettes Dispute
Notification of a Mutually Agreed Solution and
a withdrawal of a request for consultations
The following communication, dated 6 May 2015,
from the delegation of the European Union and the delegation of Indonesia to
the Chairperson of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to
Articles 3.6 and 4.4 of the DSU.
_______________
By
communication dated 13 June 2014 the European Union requested consultations
with the Government of the Republic of Indonesia ("Indonesia")
pursuant to Articles 1 and 4 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures
Governing the Settlement of Disputes ("DSU") and Article XXII:1
of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 ("GATT 1994") with
particular respect to Indonesia's recourse to Article 22.2 of the DSU in the
context of the proceedings in Case DS406 United States – Measures
Affecting the Production and Sale of Clove Cigarettes, and the
exclusion of third parties from those proceedings. The European Union
considered this to be inconsistent with Articles 21.5, 22.2, 23.1 and 23.2(a)
of the DSU, as well as Articles 10.1, 10.2 and 10.3 of the DSU.[1]
By
communication dated 3 October 2014 from the delegation of Indonesia and the
delegation of the United States to the Chairperson of the Dispute Settlement
Body Indonesia and the United States notified the DSB that they had reached a
mutually agreed solution to the matter raised by the Government of Indonesia in
United States – Measures Affecting the Production
and Sale of Clove Cigarettes (WT/DS406). In light of the mutually
agreed solution, Indonesia withdrew its request to the DSB (circulated as
WT/DS406/12) pursuant to Article 22.2 of the DSU for authorization to suspend
the application to the United States of concessions and other obligations under
the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994, the Agreement on Technical
Barriers to Trade, and the Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures. Indonesia having withdrawn its request under
Article 22.2 of the DSU, the United States withdrew its objection to that
request (circulated as WT/DS406/13).[2]
By
communication dated 8 October 2014 the Chairperson of the
Arbitrator/Arbitration Panel in DS406 informed the DSB that Indonesia and the
United States had:
a.
indicated that
they have reached a mutually agreed solution in this dispute, which they have
jointly notified to the DSB;
b.
informed the
Arbitrator/Arbitration Panel that Indonesia has withdrawn its request under
Article 22.2 of the DSU (WT/DS406/12) and that the United States has withdrawn
its objection to that request (WT/DS406/13); and
c.
jointly requested
that the Arbitrator/Arbitration Panel notify the Dispute Settlement Body that
it is not necessary for the Arbitrator/Arbitration Panel to issue a decision
and that its work has been completed.
In
light of these circumstances, the Arbitrator/Arbitration Panel informed the DSB
that it considers that it is not necessary for it to issue a decision on the
matter referred to it. The Arbitrator/Arbitration Panel therefore considers
that it has completed its work.[3]
In
light of these developments, the Parties wish to inform the DSB that the
European Union has withdrawn its Request for Consultations in DS481.
We
would ask you to circulate this notification to the relevant Councils and
Committees, as well as to the DSB, in accordance with Articles 3.6 and 4.4 of
the DSU.
(Signed)
H.E. Mr. Angelos Pangratis
Ambassador
Permanent Mission of the European Union
to the WTO
|
(Signed)
H.E. Mr Iman Pambagyo
Ambassador
Deputy Permanent Representative
In Charge of WTO issues
Mission of Indonesia
|
__________
[1] WT/DS481/1 of 19 June 2014.
[2] WT/DS406/17, G/L/917/Add.1 of 9 October 2014.
[3] WT/DS406/18 of 9 October 2014.