I.    Introduction

1)     On 1 November 1996, the Dispute Settlement Body (the "DSB") adopted (WT/DSB/M/25) the Appellate Body Report and the Panel Report, as modified by the Appellate Body Report, in Japan ‑ Taxes on Alcoholic Beverages (WT/DS8/11, WT/DS10/11 and WT/DS11/8).  As required by Article 21(3) of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (the "DSU"), Japan informed the DSB on 20 November 1996 of its intentions in respect of the implementation of the DSB's recommendations and rulings (WT/DSB/M/26).  Japan indicated that it would not be able to implement immediately but only within a "reasonable period of time".  Japan did not propose to the DSB a "reasonable period of time" for the latter's approval as provided for under Article 21(3)(a) of the DSU.  It indicated that it would initiate negotiations with the European Communities, the United States and Canada, the other parties to the dispute, on what constitutes "a reasonable period of time".  These negotiations did not succeed, and no mutual agreement within the meaning of Article 21(3)(b) of the DSU was reached.  The negotiations with the European Communities did, however, lead to an agreement on an accelerated reduction of the tariff rates on whisky and brandy as compensation for delayed implementation, but this agreement does not prejudge their position on the issue of a "reasonable period of time".