United States - Tax Treatment for "Foreign Sales Corporations" - Recourse by the European Communities to Article 21.5 of the DSU

UNITED STATES – TAX TREATMENT FOR "FOREIGN SALES CORPORATIONS"

 

Recourse by the European Communities to Article 21.5 of the DSU

 

 

            The following communication, dated 17 November 2000, from the Permanent Delegation of the European Commission to the Permanent Mission of the United States and to the Chairman of the Dispute Settlement Body, is circulated pursuant to Article 21.5 of the DSU.

 

_______________

 

 

            On 20 March 2000, the Dispute Settlement Body (the "DSB") adopted the Appellate Body Report and the Panel Report, as modified by the Appellate Body, in case WT/DS108 United States – Tax Treatment for "Foreign Sales Corporations".  The resulting DSB recommendations and rulings include the recommendation that the United States bring its measures found to be inconsistent with the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (the "SCM Agreement") and the Agreement on Agriculture into conformity with its WTO obligations, and that the United States withdraw the export subsidies at the latest with effect from 1 October 2000.

 

            On 12 October 2000, in a special session, the DSB agreed to the US request to allow it a time period ending on 1 November 2000 to implement the DSB recommendations and rulings.

 

            On 15 November 2000 the President of the United States signed an Act of the US Congress entitled FSC Repeal and Extraterritorial Income Exclusion Act of 2000 (the "FSC Replacement Act").  It is the EC understanding, as confirmed by US Ambassador to the WTO Mrs Hayes during the DSB meeting of 17 November 2000, that the United States considers this Act to bring the US into compliance with the DSB recommendations and rulings in case WT/DS108.

 

            The European Communities strongly disagrees.  The EC considers that the US has failed to comply with the above-mentioned DSB recommendations and rulings by 1 November 2000. Furthermore, the FSC Replacement Act appears to replicate the violations of the WTO Agreement found in the original dispute rather than remove them.

 

            In particular, the European Communities' considers that: