STATE
TRADING
Questions Posed By the European Union
regarding the new and full notification of canada[1]
The following communication, dated 27 September
2016, is being circulated at the request of the Delegation of the European
Union.
_______________
The EU would like to seek further
clarifications on the new notification submitted by Canada on 4 July
2016 regarding its STEs (G/STR/N/16). In particular:
Canada (all
jurisdictions, general)
Canada claims in its general
statement that its mark-ups are calculated in a uniform, non-discriminatory
nature. However, in different Canadian provinces mark-ups are calculated as
either ad valorem, flat rate, combination of ad valorem and flat rate or
volumetric taxes.
Questions 1-2
In the light of the above, how does Canada
ensure the uniform nature of calculating the mark-ups? How does Canada ensure
the de facto non-discrimination towards high value and high priced imported
products, such as wines, in case of application of the valorem based mark-ups?
Page 25, British Columbia:
According to the notification the
new wholesale price system applies also to government liquor stores and
mark-ups are applied universally to all products regardless of country of
origin.
Question 3
Could Canada clarify in detail how the principle
of uniform and non-discriminatory mark-ups is respected by the government
liquor stores in British Columbia when determining the retail price?
Page 25, Manitoba:
According to the notification,
beverage alcohol's retail price is determined by applying combination of a
category ad valorem mark-up and a flat rate per litre to the landed cost.
Question 4
Could Canada clarify in detail how it
ensures the de facto non-discrimination towards high value and high priced
imported products, such as wines, in case of application of the valorem based
mark-ups in Manitoba?
Page 27, Nova Scotia:
According to the notification,
mark-ups in Nova Scotia are established by package size within product
categories and are the same regardless of product origin within a given
category. However, importers of EU products have encountered situations in
which the mark-up applied to the liquor produced in Nova Scotia are lower that
the mark-up applied to imported products.
Question 5
Could Canada explain and justify in which
cases this may happen and explain how it ensures non-discrimination against
foreign products?
Page 29, Quebec:
According to the notification,
wines without a varietal indication or appellation of origin designation that
are bottled in Quebec may be sold in grocery stores, along with beers and light
ciders. Wines with a varietal indication or appellation of origin designation
and spirits may only be sold in SAQ outlets.
Questions 6-7
Could Canada clarify whether this will
change after the adoption of bill 88, an Act respecting development of the
small-scale alcoholic beverage industry?
Could Canada confirm that also locally
produced wine sold in supermarkets will be subject to the same mark-up as
imported products in accordance with the notification?
****
Furthermore, the EU has also one follow-up
question with reference to the replies received from Canada to our previous
questions (G/STR/Q1/CAN/10 and G/STR/Q1/CAN/10/Add.1) on the liberalisation
process of alcohols sales and retail channels. In particular:
Follow-up question to EU initial
question 8
In October 2015 the EU asked
Canada to explain the extent to which the planned new routes to market (sales
and retail channels) could be consistent with international trade rules,
insofar as they would appear to amount to discrimination between imported and
domestic products.
As a preliminary reply, Canada informed
that the provinces of Ontario and British Columbia are both in the process of
adopting changes to their liquor distribution policies with a view to
increasing efficiency and effectiveness and that the Government of Canada
worked closely with the provinces to ensure consistency of any changes with
Canada's international trade obligations.
Could Canada submit additional information
on how the new sales and retail channels in Ontario and British Columbia
provides non-discriminatory access to imported products?
__________