|
Afghanistan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
|
Albania
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
Amongst the various different
forms of EMC/EMI, only conducted and radiated limits of emissions are
mandatory.
The Technical Construction
File (TCF) can be used in circumstances where it is not feasible to have the
product tested.
|
|
Bahrain, Kingdom of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
Proof of compliance is
required (to be made available upon request), but no registration/submission
to industry Canada
is required.
Label requirements are
mandatory.
|
|
China
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colombia
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
Terminal approval
applications must be accompanied by the following documents: (i) proof of
payment made to the Information and Communications Technology Fund for
approval of the terminal
(10 SMMLV); (ii) documentation (FCC Grant) showing that the terminal complies
with FCC Standards 22H and 24E; this certification must be submitted by the
FCC to one of the authorized certification bodies; (iii) statement of
responsibility letter on compliance with the applicable technical standards;
(iv) copy of the terminal's technical specifications and (v) labelling
specifications that allow for verification of the relationship between the
terminal model and the FCCID.
|
|
Costa Rica
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
The type approval of
equipment operating in the unlicensed band (in accordance with Part 15 of the
Federal Communications Commission -FCC- rules) does not require any kind of
test from third parties. The SUTEL (Superintendencia de
Telecomunicaciones) recognises the FCC or CE certificates.
|
|
Dominican Republic
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
Egypt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
|
El Salvador
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
Only compliance with ITU
standard is required.
|
|
European Union
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
In some cases, the opinion
of a 3rd party needs to be sought, but only where a manufacture
has not applied harmonised standards or these are not available.
|
|
Georgia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
|
Guatemala
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
|
Honduras
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
The procedure is called 'Approval
of Telecommunications Equipment' and it applies to all equipment that is to
be sold and used in telecommunications networks in Honduras. Suppliers cannot
perform these procedures themselves; approval certificates from other
internationally recognized approval bodies are accepted. They are based on
OAS Inter-American Telecommunication Commission (CITEL) resolutions
concerning the mutual recognition of equipment among administrations.[2]
|
|
Hong Kong, China
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
However, manufactures or
equipment suppliers should ensure that their products are in compliance with
EMC requirements, which are based on CISPR 22.
|
|
Iceland
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
|
India
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indonesia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
|
Israel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
Mandatory requirements are
limited to EMI as for the products covered by Electrical Appliance and
Material Safety Law.
|
|
Jordan
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kazakhstan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
|
Korea, Republic of
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kuwait, the State of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
|
Kyrgyz Republic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
|
Macao, China
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
Mauritius
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moldova, Republic of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
|
Montenegro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
|
Morocco
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
|
New Zealand
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
Supplier self-declaration
and product labelling are required.
Full mutual recognition
with Australia
applies to labelled products.
Suppliers may perform
these procedures, however, for Group 2 ISM and telecommunications terminal
equipment (TTE), the test facility must be accredited by IANZ or by an
accreditation body having a mutual recognition arrangement with IANZ.
|
|
Nicaragua
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
|
Norway
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
Norway follows the
conformity assessment procedures according to Directive 89/336/EEC, Directive
73/23/EEC and Directive 1999/5/EC.
|
|
Oman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
|
Panama
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
|
Peru
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The approval procedure is
carried out by the Peruvian Government through the Ministry of Transport and
Communications, which issues an approval certificate; its purpose is to avoid
electromagnetic interference and ensure electromagnetic compatibility of the
Peruvian spectrum. Thus, the importation, manufacture, construction,
marketing and use of telecommunications equipment and/or appliances that are
connected to a public telecommunications network in order to provide any
telecommunications service and/or are used for radio broadcasting require
approval. This approval is subject to the payment of a processing fee and
applicants must submit a copy of the technical manual with specifications for
the equipment or appliance to be approved, indicating the mark, model, and
name and address of the manufacturer. In a case of domestically produced
telecommunications equipment or appliances, measurements and/or technical
verifications are conducted.
Peru
recognizes approval certificates or similar documents from the United States and/or Canada as
equivalent to its own approval certificates.
|
|
Philippines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
Qatar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
|
Russian Federation
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
The procedures are
described in the technical regulation of the Custom Union
"Electromagnetic compatibility of technical means" (adopted by the
Decision of the Commission of the Customs Union No. 879 of 9 December 2011)
and in the regulations on typical schemes of conformity assessment (adopted
by the Decision of the Commission of the Customs Union No. 621 of 7 April 2011).
Procedures are aligned with international guidelines and standards, e.g.
ISO/IEC Guides 61 and 65 (the corresponding Russian standards (GOSTs)
are identical to these).[3]
|
|
Saudi Arabia,
Kingdom of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
|
Seychelles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
|
Singapore
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tests reports from
accredited testing laboratories for conformity assessment of EM Interference
for approval of telecommunication equipment.
|
|
Switzerland
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
1. For Information Technology equipment without radio part of
which cannot be connected to a public telecommunication network, the
manufacturer may choose one of the following conformity assessment
procedures:
(a) Internal
production control;
(b) Internal
production control with involvement of a third party (conformity assessment
body).
2. For Information Technology equipment that can be connected to
a public telecommunication network but without radio transmitter part, the
manufacturer may choose one of the following conformity assessment
procedures:
(a) Internal
production control;
(b) Technical
construction file procedure;
(c) Full quality
assurance procedure.
3. For Information Technology equipment containing a radio
transmitter part, following conformity assessment procedures are possible at
the choice of the manufacturer if they apply in full technical standards
designated by the Federal Office for Communications (OFCOM):
(a) Production
control plus specific apparatus tests;
(b) Technical
construction file procedure;
(c) Full quality
assurance procedure.
4. For these products, the manufacturer who does not apply or
apply only partly the technical standards designated by the Federal Office
for Communications (OFCOM):
(a) Technical
construction file procedure;
(b) Full quality
assurance procedure.[4]
|
|
Chinese Taipei
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
There were 30
items of IT products announced as
being applicable to the declaration of conformity (DoC) scheme,
and has increased to 41
items as of March 2015. Under
the DoC scheme, product testing should be
carried out by a designated testing laboratory recognized by the BSMI.
|
|
Tajikistan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available
|
|
Thailand
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
Turkey
|
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
However, if the supplier
chooses not to apply harmonized standards or there are no harmonized
standards, 3rd party opinion is sought.[5]
|
|
Ukraine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
|
United Arab Emirates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available.
|
|
United States of America
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
Viet Nam
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information not available
|