Comments from Norway to the draft report
of the Fourth review of the SPS agreement (G/SPS/W/280/Rev.2)
Communication from NORWAY
The following communication,
received on 16 February 2016, is being circulated at the request of the
Delegation of Norway.
_______________
Norway would like to provide the
following comments to the outstanding issue on private standards in the Fourth
Review draft paper:
1 Section 14.20. Proposed Recommendations
"14.20 Recommendations:
·
Members
and Observer Governments are encouraged to provide information on any relevant
studies or analysis which they have undertaken, or of which they are aware.
·
The
Committee should consider a specific problem identified by a Member that arises
from an SPS-related private standard that affects its exports.
·
The
Committee should continue its implementation of agreed actions one to five
(G/SPS/55). The Committee may also continue its considerations of other
outstanding issues (G/SPS/W/256) and of relevant activities."
1.1. The Committee has not been able to agree on these recommendations,
and both the Committee and the Chair have come forward with several proposals
of which all have been turned down.
1.2. In order to get out of the present deadlock in the SPS Committee and
the challenges of finding consensus for the Fourth Review, Norway would like to
propose that the SPS Committee in Section 14.20 in the Fourth Review starts
with stating that some countries are of the opinion that Private Standards (PS)
fall outside the scope of the SPS Agreement, as other countries are of the
opinion that Private Standards fall within the scope of the Agreement. As a
result of this lack of consensus, the SPS Committee agrees that the Committee
disagrees on this particular question. Thus we can close the Fourth Review.
1.3. As a consequence of our basic view with regard to the status of PS
in the Committee, and as a matter of consistency, we would like to replace
"….Members are encouraged to…." with "may" in the proposed
first recommendation below.
1.4. Norway proposes the following new wording:
Alternative
I:
14.20. Recommendations:
·
The
SPS Committee agrees on the fact that some Members are of the view that private
standards are outside the scope of the SPS Agreement and thus related
information exchanges should take place on the margins of the Committee
meetings. Others, however, believe that private standards fall within the
jurisdiction of the SPS Committee and that information exchange on these issues
should be on the agenda of the Committee.
·
Members
and Observer Governments may provide information on any relevant studies or
analysis which they have undertaken, or of which they are aware.
·
The
Committee should continue its implementation of agreed actions one to five (G/SPS/55).
Alternative
II:
1.5. Another solution to finish the fourth review could be to leave out
the points where the Committee is unable to agree. That would mean to take out
point 14.20 point 2 ("The Committee should
consider a specific problem identified by a Member that arises from an
SPS-related private standard that affects its exports"), and
introduce "may" in 14.20 second bullet point as mentioned above.
14.20 Recommendations would then read:
·
Members
and Observer Governments may provide information on any relevant studies or
analysis which they have undertaken, or of which they are aware.
·
The
Committee should continue its implementation of agreed actions one to five (G/SPS/55).
2 Definition of SPS-related private standards
2.1. The Chair has proposed a package on SPS-related private standards which
were discussed at a meeting in Geneva on 19 January. The meeting did not reach
a consensus. Norway has been of the opinion that the SPS Committee has decided
to postpone the definition to a later time, due to the fact that there has not
been possible to reach a consensus on all the different proposals that the
Committee has discussed. Should, however, the Committee decide to have a
definition in the fourth review as part of a package, Norway would like to
propose to adjust the proposed definition as follows:
"An SPS related private standard is a written requirement or condition,
or a set of written requirements or conditions related to food safety, or
animal or plant health that is used in commercial transactions and that is
applied by a non-governmental authority, and as such falls outside the scope of
the SPS Agreement. The working definition is without prejudice to the rights
and obligations of Members, or the views of Members on the scope of the WTO
Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures."
2.2. In our view it is absolutely necessary to make it clear in the
definition itself, that PS are not part of the SPS Agreement.
__________