REPORT (2014) ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE
COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE
Report by the Chairperson
The
present report on the regular meetings of the Committee on Agriculture held in 2014
is submitted on the responsibility of the Chairperson, Mrs. Miriam Chaves of Argentina, as
agreed by the Committee at its seventy-fifth session.
_______________
1.1. The present draft report is being circulated by the Chairperson of
the Committee on Agriculture on her own responsibility. This report provides a
summary of the activities of the Committee on Agriculture ("the
Committee") during 2014.
1.2. The Committee held four meetings in 2014 on 29 January, 21 March,
5-6 June and 13 November.[1] In addition, five informal
meetings were held in 2014.
1.3. In accordance with Article 18.1 of the Agreement on Agriculture
("the Agreement") at each of its meetings the Committee reviewed
progress in the implementation of Members' commitments. This review process is
undertaken on the basis of notifications submitted by Members in the areas of market
access, domestic support, export competition, export prohibitions and
restrictions as well as under the follow-up to the Marrakesh Ministerial
Decision on NFIDCs. In total 82 notifications were subject to review in
2014. Specific concerns were also raised regarding the outstanding
notifications that some Members had yet to submit to the Committee.[2]
1.4. Overall in the Committee meetings that took place in January, March,
June and November 2014 Members posed 237 questions in connection with
specific notifications. These questions were distributed as follows: 76%
related to domestic support issues, 17% to market access, 6.5% to export
subsidies and 0.5% in relation to the NFIDC Decision.[3]
1.5. A wide range of matters relevant to the implementation of
commitments was also raised independently of notifications under the provisions
of Article 18.6 of the Agreement. A total of 35 implementation-related
issues were raised by eleven Members during 2014.[4] Out of these, 16 issues were
discussed for the first time in 2014, whereas the remaining issues were
discussed one or more times in previous years either under the review of
notifications or under matters raised under Article 18.6. Topics in relation to
domestic support were among the most discussed in this section (e.g., request
for additional information on domestic support measures).
1.6. At each meeting the Committee reviewed the current status of
Members' compliance with their notification obligations under the Agreement. A
document summarizing the current status of compliance with notification
requirements was circulated at each Committee meeting.[5]
While a significant proportion of notifications are still outstanding (about
30%), Members have increased their efforts to bring their notification record
up to date by submitting notifications covering multiple reporting periods.
1.7. In March the Committee, in the absence of an agreed outcome,
concluded work on updating the list of Significant Exporters for the purposes
of Table ES:2 notification.[6]
The results of the discussions on the subject are reflected in the
Chairperson's report "review of the list of significant exporters".[7]
The Chairperson encouraged Members who, based on recent trade data, no longer
hold a share exceeding 5% in world agricultural trade of particular products,
to inform the Committee about their decision to make (or not to make) a Table
ES:2 notification in view of their current share in world agricultural trade.[8]
Similarly, in the interest of transparency, the Chair suggested that those
Members who, based on recent data, hold world agricultural trade shares
exceeding 5%, but who did not appear in the 1995 list of significant
exporters (G/AG/2/Add.1), might consider making a Table ES:2 notification
in respect of the relevant products on a voluntary basis.[9]
In the absence of an agreement on a updated list of significant exporters, the
old list agreed in 1995 (G/AG/2/Add.1) continues to determine the Table ES:2
notification obligation. An update of the list in the future would enhance the
transparency and monitoring functions of the Committee by ensuring that Table
ES:2 notification obligations reflect the current structure of world trade.
1.8. The first annual dedicated discussion on export competition took
place during the June meeting. The discussions were held on the basis of the
Secretariat's background document based on the answers to the questionnaire
sent to Members on 10 February 2014, supplemented by information already
contained in document TN/AG/S/27/Rev.1, and relevant information coming from
Table ES:1 and ES:3 notifications and notifications to the Working Party on
State Trading Enterprises received by the Secretariat up to 30 April 2014.[10]
This discussion was viewed as the first concrete step of one deliverable of the
Bali Ministerial outcomes. The Chairperson held informal consultations to
discuss how the information collection process for this exercise could be
enhanced in 2015.
1.9. The Follow-up to the Ministerial Decision on Measures Concerning the
Possible Negative Effects of the Reform Programme on Least developed and Net
Food-Importing Developing Countries (NFIDC) was monitored in the Committee's
November meeting. The monitoring exercise was undertaken on the basis of, inter
alia, Table NF:1 notifications by donor Members,
contributions by Members and observer organizations,[11]
as well as a background note prepared by the Secretariat.[12] The WTO list of NFIDCs[13]
remained unchanged as no new applications had been received since 2012.
1.10. The Committee maintained a standing item on its agenda relating to
implementation issues, both in the framework of its follow-up to the Decision
by the Doha Ministerial Conference on Implementation-Related Issues and
Concerns[14],
as well as in the framework of issues and proposals referred to it by the
General Council.
1.11. In the Committee Members continue to exchange views on approaches to
strengthen the functioning of the Committee particularly its work relating to
transparency. Members also continued discussions on how to improve submission
of notifications. These issues were discussed in informal meetings in January,
March, and June.[15]
The Committee also discussed under an informal setting issues relating to
trends in domestic support, trade trends and aspects related to the
implementation of market access commitments. On this last topic, the Secretariat
prepared, at the Committee's request, a compilation of recent agricultural
tariff and trade data.[16]
1.12. The Committee also discussed in informal and formal settings
follow-up to the Bali Ministerial decisions related to (i) the Understanding on
Tariff Rate Quota Administration Provisions of Agricultural Products, as
defined in Article 2 of the Agreement on Agriculture; (ii) Public Stockholding
for Food Security Purpose; and (iii) the Bali Ministerial Declaration on Export
Competition. At the November meeting as part of the follow-up to the Bali Decision on TRQ administration, the Chair
suggested adopting as best practice a Table MA:2 notification format including
an additional column to report TRQ fill rates.
1.13. To facilitate the preparation and review of agriculture
notifications, the WTO's Agriculture and Commodities Division in collaboration
with the Institute for Training and Technical Cooperation delivered the fifth
workshop in Geneva
on agriculture notifications on 10-13 June 2014. A total of 20 participants
from developing country capitals were funded by the WTO and a number of
participants came on a self-funded basis. The workshop included practical
exercises related to the review process of the Committee on Agriculture and
provided hands-on training on the use of the Agriculture Information Management
System (AG-IMS). Participants also had the opportunity to meet individually
with Secretariat staff to consult on unfulfilled notification obligations. In
addition, in 2014 the Secretariat conducted five national seminars on
agriculture notifications in Dominican Republic,
Malaysia, Paraguay, Qatar
and the United Arab Emirates.[17]
1.14. The following international intergovernmental organizations have
regular observer status in the Committee: Food and Agriculture Organization,
International Monetary Fund, the International Grains Council, OECD, UNCTAD,
World Food Programme, and the World Bank. The Inter-American Institute for
Agricultural Cooperation (IICA) continued to benefit from ad hoc observer
status. No consensus has been reached as regards requests for observer status
by eleven other international organizations.
1.15. The Committee agreed to hold regular meetings on 4 March, 4 June,
24 September and 19 November in 2015.
__________
[1] The summary reports of these meetings are contained in documents
G/AG/R/73, G/AG/R/74, G/AG/R/75 and Corr.1 and G/AG/R/76 [to be issued].
[2] See for example G/AG/R/73, paras. 1.9-1.11.
[3] See G/AG/W/118 section 2.1-2.5; G/AG/W/126, section 2.1-2.4;
G/AG/W/135, section 2.1-2.4; and G/AG/W/136, section 2.7-2.7.
[4] The issues raised included Egypt's export restriction on rice;
European Union's levy on fruits and vegetables; India's rice exports; Japan's
new agricultural policy; Canada's proposed changes to tariff schedule; India's
market support price for rice; India's sugar export subsidies; Turkey's
domestic support and export subsidies; United States' farm Bill; Brazil's
2014-15 Harvest Plan; Honduras' tax exemptions; European Union's Sugar
production levies; China's cotton Domestic Support; Ecuador's import licensing
of certain agricultural products; India's national food security bill; Turkey's
destination of wheat flour sale; United States Farm Bill; India's sugar export
subsidies; India's wheat stocks and exports; Turkey's domestic support and
export subsidies; Thailand's paddy pledging scheme; Canada's dairy policies;
India's subsidization policy; India's national agricultural insurance scheme;
India's landholding laws; Ecuador's domestic purchase requirements; Canada's
proposed changes to tariff schedule; Saint Lucia's domestic purchase
requirements for poultry and pork; Brazil's domestic support programmes; Costa
Rica's compliance with AMS commitments; Brazil's tax credit programmes;
Canada's tariff-rate quota cheese; Russian Federation's agricultural support
for 2015; Thailand's rice farmer assistance programme; and Turkey's
agricultural credit and investment subsidies. (see G/AG/W/118 section
1.1-1.14; G/AG/W/126, section 1.1-1.16; G/AG/W/135, section 1.1-1.17; and
G/AG/W/136, section 1.1-1.17.).
[5] G/AG/GEN/86/Rev.16, Rev. 17, Rev. 18 and Rev. 19.
[6] Section 2.3
of G/AG/R/74.
[8] No Members falling in this situation has so far informed the
Committee about their decision.
[9] Some Table ES:2 notifications made subsequent to the circulation of
the Chairperson's report did incorporate additional products as well as the
enhanced transparency elements as recommend in the report. See for example
G/AG/N/CAN/101, G/AG/N/NZL/85 and G/AG/N/USA/99.
[10] G/AG/W/125 and addenda 1 to 4 dated 21 May, completed by two
corrigenda dated 28 May.
[11] G/AG/GEN/121, submitted by IICA; G/AG/GEN/122, submitted by FAO;
G/AG/GEN/123 submitted by OECD and G/AG/GEN/124 submitted by the IGC.
[14] Paragraph 2 of WT/MIN(01)/17.
[15] See, for example, G/AG/W/117, G/AG/W/122, G/AG/W/128 and
G/AG/W/113.
[17] The
technical assistance activities in the United
Arab Emirates and Qatar will take place in the months
of November and December, respectively.